Advertisement

Modeling the Non-Markovian, Non-stationary Scaling Dynamics of Financial Markets

  • Fulvio Baldovin
  • Dario Bovina
  • Francesco Camana
  • Attilio L. Stella
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)

Abstract

A central problem of Quantitative Finance is that of formulating a probabilistic model of the time evolution of asset prices allowing reliable predictions on their future volatility. As in several natural phenomena, the predictions of such a model must be compared with the data of a single process realization in our records. In order to give statistical significance to such a comparison, assumptions of stationarity for some quantities extracted from the single historical time series, like the distribution of the returns over a given time interval, cannot be avoided. Such assumptions entail the risk of masking or misrepresenting non-stationarities of the underlying process, and of giving an incorrect account of its correlations. Here we overcome this difficulty by showing that five years of daily Euro/US-Dollar trading records in the about three hours following the New York market opening, provide a rich enough ensemble of histories. The statistics of this ensemble allows to propose and test an adequate model of the stochastic process driving the exchange rate. This turns out to be a non-Markovian, self-similar process with non-stationary returns. The empirical ensemble correlators are in agreement with the predictions of this model, which is constructed on the basis of the time-inhomogeneous, anomalous scaling obeyed by the return distribution.

Keywords

Exchange Rate Financial Market Stochastic Volatility Return Distribution Stochastic Volatility Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Scholz CH (2002) The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lu ET, Hamilton RJ, McTiernan JM, Bromond KR (1993) Solar flares and avalanches in driven dissipative systems. Astrophys. J. 412: 841–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bjornstad ON, Grenfell BT (2001) Noisy clockwork: time series analysis of population fluctuations in animals. Science 293: 638–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cont R (2001) Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues. Quant. Finance 1: 223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baldovin F, Stella AL (2007) Scaling and efficiency determine the irreversible evolution of a market. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104: 19741–19744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stella AL, Baldovin F (2008) Role of scaling in the statistical modeling of Finance. Pramana — Journal of Physics 71, 341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bassler KE, McCauley JL, Gunaratne GH (2007) Nonstationary increments, scaling distributions, and variable diffusion processes in financial markets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 17287–17290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Challet and P.P. Peirano (2008) The ups and downs of the renormalization group applied to financial time series. arXiv:0807.4163Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Andreoli, F. Caravenna, P. Dai Pra, G. Posta (2010) Scaling and multiscaling in financial indexes: a simple model. arXiv:1006.0155Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Benedetti PG, Stillinger FH (2001) Supercooled liquids and the glass transition. Nature 410: 259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stella AL, Baldovin F (2010) Anomalous scaling due to correlations: Limit theorems and self-similar processes. J. Stat. Mech. P02018Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gheorghiu S, Coppens MO (2004) Heterogeneity explains features of “anomalous” thermodynamics and statistics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 15852–15856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bouchaud JP, Potters M (2000) Theory of Financial Risks Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heston L (1993) A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options. The Review of Financial Studies 6: 327–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gatheral J (2006) The volatility surface: a practitioner’s guide. J. Wiley and Sons, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fouque JP, Papanicolaou G, Sircar KR (2000) Derivatives in financial markets with stochastic volatility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldenfeld N, Kadanoff LP (1999) Simple Lessons from Complexity. Science 284: 87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kadanoff LP (2005) Statistical Physics, Statics, Dynamics and Renormalization. World Scientific SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jona-Lasinio G (2001) Renormalization group and probability theory. Phys. Rep. 352: 439–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Black F, Scholes M. (1973) The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. J. Polit. Econ. 81: 637–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fulvio Baldovin
    • 1
  • Dario Bovina
    • 1
  • Francesco Camana
    • 1
  • Attilio L. Stella
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, INFN e CNISMUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations