Skip to main content

Exponential Resilience and Decay of Market Impact

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: New Economic Windows ((NEW))

Abstract

Assuming a particular price process, it was shown by Gatheral in [6], that a model that combines nonlinear price impact with exponential decay of market impact admits price manipulation, an undesirable feature that should lead to rejection of the model. Subsequently, Alfonsi and Schied proved in [2] that their model of the order book which has nonlinear market impact and exponential resilience, is free of price manipulation. In this paper, we show how these at-first-sight incompatible results are in reality perfectly compatible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alfonsi A., Fruth A., Schied A. (2010) Optimal execution strategies in limit order books with general shape functions. Quantitative Finance 10:143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alfonsi A., Schied A. (2010) Optimal execution and absence of price manipulations in limit order book models. SIAM J. Financial Math. 1:490–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alfonsi A., Schied A., Slynko A. (2009) Order book resilience, price manipulations, and the positive portfolio problem. Available at SSRN: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id=1498514

    Google Scholar 

  4. Almgren R., Chee T., Hauptmann E., Li H. (2005) Equity market impact Risk Magazine July 2005:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bouchaud J.-P., Gefen Y., Potters M., Wyart M. (2004) Fluctuations and response in financial markets: the subtle nature of ‘random’ price changes. Quantitative Finance 4:176–190

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gatheral J. (2010) No-Dynamic-Arbitrage and Market Impact. Quantitative Finance 10: Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gatheral J., Schied A., Slynko A. (2010) Transient linear price impact and Fredholm integral equations. Available at SSRN: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id=1531466

    Google Scholar 

  8. Obizhaeva A., Wang J. (2005) Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics. Available at SSRN: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id=686168

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gatheral, J., Schied, A., Slynko, A. (2011). Exponential Resilience and Decay of Market Impact. In: Abergel, F., Chakrabarti, B.K., Chakraborti, A., Mitra, M. (eds) Econophysics of Order-driven Markets. New Economic Windows. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1766-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics