Skip to main content

Abstract

Imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of patients with acute and chronic urinary tract obstruction. The cause of obstruction varies greatly with the patient population and the geographic locale. In a series reporting on percutaneous nephrostomy drainage, urinary obstruction was related to calculus disease in 26% of patients and to malignancy in 61%. Carcinoma of the bladder, cervix, and colon were the most common primaries in patients with malignancies and urinary obstruction [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Farrell TA, Hicks MS (1997) A review of radiologically guided percutaneous nephrostomies in 303 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8:769–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoppe H, Studer R, Kessler TM et al (2006) Alternate or additional findings to stone disease on unenhanced computerized tomography for acute flank pain can impact management. J Urol 175:1725–1730; discussion 1730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz DS, Scheer M, Lumerman JH et al (2000) Alternative or additional diagnoses on unenhanced helical computed tomography for suspected renal colic: experience with 1000 consecutive examinations. Urology 56:53–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmad NA, Ather MH, Rees J (2003) Incidental diagnosis of diseases on un-enhanced helical computed tomography performed for ureteric colic. BMC Urology 17:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sourtzis S, Thibeau JF, Damry N et al (1999) Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:1491–1494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G et al (1998) Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol 8:212–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fielding JR, Silverman SG, Samuel S et al (1998) Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: a replacement for excretory urography in planning treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1051–1053

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Catalano O, Nunziata A, Altei F et al (2002) Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:379–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M et al (1997) Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 204:27–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan-Tack KM, Truffa MM, Struble KA, Birnkrant DB (2007) Atazanavir-associated nephrolithiasis: cases from the US Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System. AIDS 21:1215–1218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ciaschini MW, Remer EM, Baker ME et al (2009) Urinary calculi: Radiation dose reduction of 50% and 75% at CT — effect on sensitivity. Radiology 251:105–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Katz SI, Saluja S, Brink JA et al (2006) Dose associated with unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: impact of repetitive studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1120–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirpalani A, Khalili K, Lee S, Haider MA (2005) Renal colic: comparison of use and outcomes of unenhanced helical CT for emergency investigation in 1998 and 2002. Radiology 236:554–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ha M, MacDonald RD (2004) Impact of CT scan in patients with first episode of suspected nephrolithiasis. J Emerg Med 27:225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kenney PJ (2003) CT evaluation of urinary lithiasis. Radiol Clin N Am 41:979–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. LeRoy AJ (2006) Imaging of acute maternal diseases in pregnancy. Categorical course in diagnostic radiology at 92nd scientific assembly and annual meeting, Chicago, Illinois, RSNA. Genitourinary radiology syllabus 2006:271–279

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fielding JR, Washburn D (2005) Imaging the pregnant patient: a uniform approach. J Women’s Imaging 7:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Middleton WD, Dodds WJ, Lawson TL, Foley WD (1988) Renal calculi: sensitivity for detection with US. Radiology 167:239–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sheafor DH, Hertzberg BS, Freed KS (2000) Nonenhanced Helical CT and US in the Emergency Evaluation of Patients with Renal Colic: Prospective Comparison. Radiology 217:792–797

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Catalano O, Nunziata A, Alei F et al (2002) Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:379–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fowler KAB, Locken JA, Duchesne JH, Williamson MR (2002) US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard. Radiology 222:109–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tublin ME, Dodd GD, Verdile VP (1994) Acute renal colic: diagnosis with duplex Doppler US. Radiology 193:697–701

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Burge HJ, Middleton WD, McClennan BL, Hildebolt CF (1991) Ureteral jets in healthy subjects and in patients with unilateral ureteral calculi: comparison with color Doppler US. Radiology 180:437–442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shokeir AA, El-Diasty T, Eassa W et al (2004) Diagnosis of ureteral obstruction in patients with compromised renal function: the role of noninvasive imaging modalities. J Urol 171:2303–2306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shokeir AA, El-Diasty T, Eassa W et al (2004) Diagnosis of noncalcareous hydronephrosis: role of magnetic resonance urography and noncontrast computed tomography. Urology 63:225–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. El-Ghar MEA, Shokheir AA, El-Diasty T et al (2004) Contrast enhanced spiral computerized tomography in patients with chronic obstructive uropathy and normal serum creatinine: a single session for anatomical and functional assessment. J Urol 172:985–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zielonko J, Studniarek M, Markuszewski M (2003) MR Urography of obstructive uropathy: diagnostic value of the method in selected clinical groups. Eur Radiol 13:802–809

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zagoria RJ, Khatod EG, Chen MYM (2001) Abdominal radio — graphy after CT reveals urinary calculi; a method to predict usefulness of abdominal radiography on the basis of size and CT attenuation of calculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:1117–1122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Assi Z, Platt JF, Francis IR et al (2000) Sensitivity of CT scout radiography and abdominal radiography for revealing ureteral calculi on helical CT: implications for radiologic follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:333–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rubenstein JN, Schaeffer AJ (2003) Managing complicated urinary tract infections. The urologic view. Infect Dis Clin N Am 17:333–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dacher J, Pfister C, Monroc M et al (1996) Power Doppler sonographic pattern of acute pyelonephritis in children: comparison with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:1451–1455

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Majd M, Nussbaum Blask AR, Markle BM et al (2001) Acute pyelonephritis: comparison with Tc99m-DMSA SPECT, spiral CT, MR imaging, and power Doppler US in an experimental pig model. Radiology 218:101–108

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wiseman AC (2009) Polyomavirus nephropathy: A current perspective and clinical considerations. Am J Kidney Dis 54:131–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pearle MS, Pierce HL, Miller GL et al (1996) Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi. J Urol 160:1260–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yablon CM, Banner MP, Ramchandani P et al (2004) Complications of prostate cancer treatment: spectrum of imaging findings. Radiographics 24:S181–S194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramchandani, P., Fielding, J.R. (2010). Urinary Tract Obstruction and Infection. In: Hodler, J., Zollikofer, C.L., Von Schulthess, G.K. (eds) Diseases of the Abdomen and Pelvis 2010–2013. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1637-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1637-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1636-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1637-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics