Renal Tumors

  • Richard H. Cohan
  • Ronald J. Zagoria


This chapter reviews recent advances in the imaging of renal masses, primarily using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The focus is on developments in the use of imaging to differentiate benign from malignant renal lesions and to assess patients following treatment for a renal mass.


Renal Tumor Partial Nephrectomy Renal Cancer Renal Mass Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cohan RH, Sherman LS, Korobkin M et al (1995) Renal masses: assessment of corticomedullary-phase and nephrographicphase CT scans. Radiology 196:445–451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE (1996) Multiphasic renal CT: comparison of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases. Radiology 200:753–758PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hecht EM, Israel GM, Krinsky GA et al (2004) Renal masses: quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging. Radiology 232:373–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patel NS, Poder L, Wang ZJ et al (2009) The characterization of small hypoattenuating renal masses on contrast enhanced CT. Clin Imag 33:295–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choyke PL (2003) Imaging of hereditary renal cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 41:1037–1051CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bosniak MA, Birnbaum BA, Krinsky GA, Waisman J (1995) Small renal parenchymal neoplasms: further observations on growth. Radiology 197:589–597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang J, Kang SK, Wang L et al (2009) Distribution of renal tumor growth rates determined by using serial volumetric CT measurements. Radiology 250:137–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pahernik S, Ziegler S, Roos F et al (2007) Small renal tumors: correlation of clinical and pathological features with tumor size. J Urol 178:414–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bosniak MA (1986) The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 158:1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Israel GM, Bosniak MA (2005) How I do it: evaluating renal masses. Radiology 236:441–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gabr AH, Gdor Y, Roberts WW, Wolf JS (2008) Radiographic surveillance of minimally and moderately complex renal cysts. Br J Urol Int 103:1116–1119Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA (2004) Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 231:365–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farrelly C, Delaney H, McDermott R, Malone D (2008) Do all non-calcified echogenic renal lesions found on ultrasound need further evaluation with CT? Abdominal Imaging 33:44–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Helenon O, Chretien Y, Paraf F et al (1993) Renal cell carcinoma containing fat: demonstration with CT. Radiology 188:429–430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simpson E, Patel U (2006) Diagnosis of angiomyolipoma using computed tomography-region of interest ≤10 HU or 4 adjacent pixels ≤10 HU are recommended as the diagnostic thresholds. Clin Radiol 61:410–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Israel GM, Hindman N, Hecht E, Krinsky G (2005) The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1868–1872Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Israel GM, Bosniak MA, Slywotzky CM et al (2002) CT differentiation of large exophytic renal angiomyolipomas and perirenal liposarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:769–773PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ellingson JJ, Coakley FV, Joe BN et al (2008) Computed tomographic distinction of perirenal liposarcoma from exophytic angiomyolipoma: a feature analysis study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:548–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jinzaki M, Silverman SG, Tanimoto A et al (2005) Angiomyolipomas that do not contain fat attenuation at unenhanced CT. Radiology 234:311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Catalano OA, Samir AE, Sahani DV, Hahn PF (2008) Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat? Radiology 247:738–746CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simpfendorfer C, Herts BR, Motta-Ramirez GA et al (2009) Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative attenuation pixels aid diagnosis? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:438–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim JK, Kim HS, Jang YJ et al (2006) Renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from other neoplasms at double-echo chemical shift FLASH MR imaging. Radiology 239:274–280Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tuncali K, van Sonnenberg E, Shankar S et al (2004) Evaluation of patients referred for percutaneous ablation of renal tumors: importance of a preprocedural diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:575–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC et al (2003) Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 2217–2220Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Choudhary S, Rajesh A, Mayer NJ et al (2009) Renal oncocytoma: CT features cannot reliably distinguish oncocytoma from other renal neoplasms. Clin Radiol 64:517–522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL et al (2006) The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 175:425–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shah RB, Bakshi N, Hafez KS et al (2005) Image-guided biopsy in the evaluation of renal mass lesions in contemporary urological practice: indications, adequacy, clinical impact, and limitations of the pathological diagnosis. Hum Pathol 36:1309–1315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hes O, Michal M, Kuroda N et al (2007) Vimentin reactivity in renal oncocytoma: immunohistochemical study in 234 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131:1782–1788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Prasad S, Surabhi VR, Menias CO et al (2007) Benign renal neoplasms in adults: cross-sectional imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yamada T, Endo M, Tsuboi M et al (2008) Differentiation of pathologic subtypes of papillary renal cell carcinoma on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1559–1563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Oliva MR, Glickman JN, Zou KH et al (2009) Renal cell carcinoma: T1 and T2 signal intensity characteristics of papillary and clear cell types correlated with pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1524–1530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sun MRM, Ngo L, Genega EM et al (2009) Renal cell carcinoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation of tumor subtypes-correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 250:793–802CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Taouli B, Thakur RK, Mannelli L et al (2009) Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 251:398–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ng CS, Wood CG, Silverman PM et al (2008) Renal cell carcinoma: diagnosis, staging, and surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1220–1232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wile GE, Leyendecker JR, Krehbiel KA et al (2007) CT and MR imaging after imaging-guided thermal ablation of renal neoplasms. Radiographics 27:325–339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Davenport M, Caoili EM, Cohan RH et al (2009) MR and CT characteristics of successfully ablated renal masses status-post radiofrequency ablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1571–1578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rutherford EE, Cast JEI, Breen DJ (2008) Immediate and long-term CT appearances following radiofrequency ablation of renal tumours. Clin Radiol 63:220–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kawamoto S, Solomon SB, Bluemke DA, Fishman EK (2009) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging appearance of renal neoplasms after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 30:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Masterson TA, Russo P (2008) A case of port-site recurrence and locoregional metastasis after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Nat Clin Prac 5:345–349Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag Italia 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard H. Cohan
    • 1
  • Ronald J. Zagoria
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Wake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations