Abstract
Viruses are significant causes of nosocomial infections, particularly in intensive care unit (ICU) where seriously ill and vulnerable patients are being cared for. Four major routes of nosocomial virus transmission in the ICU are identified, viz. respiratory, faecal–oral, exposure to blood and body fluid and direct contact with infected patients or through fomites. Different infection control measures are available according to the natural history, biology, pathogenesis, epidemiology and mode of transmission of each virus. In this chapter, we discuss some of the important viruses that could be associated with nosocomial infections in the ICU. Intensivists should work closely with microbiologists, virologists and the laboratory to diagnose such infection early, work proactively to prevent outbreaks and manage viral infections using appropriate strategies.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Droplet and airborne transmissionDroplet and airborne transmission
- Faecal–oral transmissionFaecal–oral transmission
- Blood and body fluidBlood and body fluid
- Direct contact or fomitesDirect contact or fomites
- ImmunosuppressionImmunosuppression
- PregnancyPregnancy
- IsolationIsolation
- CohortingCohorting
- Hand hygieneHand hygiene
- VaccinationVaccination
- Antiviral prophylaxisAntiviral prophylaxis
1 Introduction
Viruses are significant causes of nosocomial infections, but their importance has been underappreciated in the past. However, outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), avian and pandemic influenza with high morbidity and mortality rates increased the awareness of intensivists regarding the devastating effects of nosocomial spread of viral infections in intensive care units (ICU).
Advances in medicine have led to a large number of immunocompromised patients susceptible to severe viral infections. Many such patients are cared for in the ICU and in turn become an infectious hazard for other vulnerable patients. Health care workers can acquire common viral infections from the community and spread them to susceptible patients in the ICU. Patients in neonatal (NICU) and paediatric (PICU) ICUs are most vulnerable because of the lack of prior immunity against many viruses circulating in the community. Recent improvements in diagnostic methods have enabled the rapid diagnosis and monitoring of many viral infections. Rapid and accurate typing of viral strains using a molecular technique can help identify the source of outbreaks. Also, specific postexposure prophylaxis and treatment are now available for many important nosocomial viral infections. In this chapter, we discuss some of the important viruses that could be associated with nosocomial infections in the ICU, according to their usual route of transmission (Table 20.1). Infection control measures recommended for preventing these viral infections are listed in Table 20.2.
2 Viruses Transmitted by Droplets and Airborne Route
2.1 Influenza Viruses
Influenza viruses (family Orthomyxoviridae) are classified into types A, B and C. Annual seasonal outbreaks of influenza are caused by minor antigenic changes (antigenic drift) seen in influenza A and B viruses. Major changes in antigenic subtypes (antigenic shift) are only found in influenza A virus and typically involve the emergence of novel hemagglutinin (H) and/or neuraminidase (N) proteins on the viral envelope. Pandemic influenza occurs when a new influenza A strain emerges, to which the majority of the world’s population has little or no immunity. There were three influenza pandemics in the last century, of which the pandemic in 1918 due to the H1N1 virus was the most severe. The first pandemic of this century occurred in 2009 [1] and was due to another H1N1 variant that emerged through a quadruple reassortment of viral RNAs derived from human, avian, Eurasian and North American swine influenza sources [2]. The presence of animal influenza subtypes, particularly avian influenza viruses such as H5N1, is of continuous concern, as these could be the source of future pandemics. Though with relatively high case-fatality rate, H5N1 avian influenza virus has so far only caused a limited number of human infections in restricted geographical locations with little evidence of human to human spread. However, the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus proved to be a major burden for ICU staff [3].
Clinically, influenza infection is characterised by abrupt onset of fever, sore throat, myalgia, cough, headache and malaise. Young children may develop croup, pneumonia or middle ear infection. With seasonal influenza, complications are often seen in the elderly, the immunocompromised and those with pre-existing chronic heart or lung disease or diabetes. During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, children and young adults were more susceptible [4]. Overall fatality rate was <0.5%, but as many as 9–31% of hospitalised patients needed ICU admission [5]. Severe disease and high mortality rates were seen in pregnant women, patients with underlying medical pulmonary, cardiac, metabolic, neuromuscular illness and severe obesity, and those in whom the diagnosis and admission was delayed [6–8]. Respiratory failures could be caused by viral pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In addition, secondary bacterial infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae or Staphylococcus aureus (often methicillin resistant) were found in 20–24% of ICU patients and 26–38% of patients who died [3, 5, 9]. Fatal cases were often complicated by multiorgan failure.
Influenza has a short incubation time of 1–4 days. The virus is transmitted via droplets, and patients are infectious during the prodromal phase and up to 7 days after symptom onset. Rapid antigen detection from respiratory secretions is available, but this was found to be insensitive for the 2009 H1N1 pandemic virus [10]. More sensitive and specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods had to be used [11]. Due to the infection-control hazards of taking nasopharyngeal aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavage, the use of throat and nasal swabs were advocated. A complete respiratory diagnostic workup needed to be performed to exclude other viral, bacterial and noninfectious causes. A single negative influenza PCR result on an upper respiratory sample did not definitively exclude the diagnosis [12]. In addition, other concurrent or secondary infections had to be considered. Protocols needed to be in place to ensure satisfactory triage of patients according to severity [13]. Early administration of specific neuraminidase inhibitors, such as oral doses of oseltamivir or inhalation zanamivir, seemed to be beneficial [14]. In more refractory cases, the off-license use of intravenously administered zanamivir or peramivir was tried. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was found to be useful in very severe cases [12].
The risk of nosocomial transmission to other hospitalised patients and staff is well documented. Infected patients should ideally be cared for in a single room or cohorted together. Health care workers should be protected through the proper use of personal protective equipments, including respirators or masks, eye protection, gowns/aprons and gloves [15, 16]. High-filtration respirator to FFP3 (Europe) or N95/N99 (USA) standard should be used for staff carrying out aerosol-generating procedures after fit testing and training. Surgical masks should be adequate for nonaerosol contacts [16]. Environmental contamination is an important source of transmission. Good hand hygiene can prevent transmission through this route.
Vaccination is the most specific preventative measure. Annual seasonal influenza vaccination to vulnerable individuals and health care workers has been advocated. A specific vaccine against the H1N1 pandemic strain was developed within months of the onset of the outbreak. However, vaccine uptake rates amongst health care workers are usually poor, and more needs to be done to educate both patients and staff.
2.2 Respiratory Syncytial Virus
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (family Paramyxoviridae) is a major cause of lower respiratory tract infections in young children and infants. There are two subtypes, A and B, with varying dominance in different years [17]. The incidence of RSV is seasonal in temperate climates, and hospital admissions usually peak during winter months. Prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and congenital heart disease are associated with a significant risk for admission to high-dependency units or PICU. In Switzerland, it was estimated that approximately 1–2% of each annual birth cohort required such admission. RSV can also cause significant disease in adults, particularly in immunocompromised individuals such as patients undergoing therapy for haematological malignancies, the elderly and those with chronic pulmonary disease [18].
The most rapid diagnosis of RSV is by direct antigen detection methods such as chromatographic immunoassays. A typical rapid test method is completed within 30 min and can be used as a point of care testing method in emergency rooms and ICUs. However, these rapid tests lack sensitivity [19]. More recently, many laboratories have begun using multiplex real-time nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAAT) to diagnose respiratory tract infections, including RSV [20]. Although NAAT is highly sensitive, it is not a rapid testing method. Hence, it is desirable to have a mixed strategy of diagnostic approaches, such as an initial rapid direct antigen test followed by retesting of negative samples by NAAT.
Nosocomial transmission of RSV in the ICU and haemoncology units has frequently been reported. It is important to identify infected patients and to apply prompt and effective infection control measures (Table 20.2). It is recognised that a combination of cohorting patients using dedicated health care staff, contact isolation of patients, strict adherence to hand hygiene; and screening visitors, family members and health care staff for upper respiratory tract infection symptoms significantly reduce the cross-infection rate of RSV. In haemoncology units, the practice of enhanced seasonal infection control programs for RSV has been shown to be effective [21]. The usefulness of wearing masks and goggles is less clear.
There is no safe and effective vaccine to prevent RSV infection. However, immunoprophylaxis in the form of RSV immunoglobulin (RSV-IG) or humanised monoclonal antibodies (palivizumab) is available as prophylaxis for some high-risk patients to prevent serious RSV disease or to limit further nosocomial spread. Both palivizumab and RSV-IG have been shown to decrease the incidence of RSV hospitalisation and ICU admission, although there was no significant reduction in the risk of mechanical ventilation or mortality rate. When given prophylaxis, infants born <35 weeks gestational age and those with chronic lung and congenital heart disease all had a significant reduction in the risk of RSV hospitalisation [22].
Treating RSV infection is mainly supportive, including oxygen, ventilation and bronchodilatative drugs. Aerosolised ribavirin has often been used in severe cases, with or without gamma globulin i.v. [23]. However, evidence for the clinical efficacy of ribavirin in RSV infection remains inconclusive [24]. The use of aerosolised ribavirin needs to be carefully controlled, as there are potential teratogenic effects on pregnant staff and visitors. Others have tried a combination of palivizumab i.v. with or without ribavirin [25].
Another paramyxovirus, known as human metapneumovirus (hMPV), shares a similar spectrum of clinical illness as RSV. It is likely that general infection control measures against RSV would also be effective against hMPV.
2.3 Parainfluenza Viruses
There are four types of human parainfluenza virus (PIV) types: PIV 1–4 (family Paramyxoviridae). Infections with PIV1 and 2 are seasonal, with a peak in autumn affecting mainly children between 6 months and 6 years of age. Clinically, patients often present with croup or a febrile upper respiratory tract infection. In contrast, PIV3 is endemic throughout the year and infects mostly young infants in the first 6 month of life and up to 2 years of age. Clinically, there is no specific presentation in PIV3, but bronchiolitis and pneumonia are not uncommon. In immunocompromised adults, such as stem cell transplant recipients, PIV3 is associated with a high mortality rate. Such patients often present with severe pneumonia and many require admission to the ICU.
The diagnosis of PIV infection can be confirmed by immunofluorescence antigen detection or NAAT [26]. Nosocomial transmission is often due to PIV3 and has been documented in neonatal care and adult haematology units [27]. Infection control precautions are the same as for RSV. Despite several uncontrolled case series of apparent successful use of intravenously, orally or aerosolised administration of ribavirin to treat PIV infections, there is no clear evidence that ribavirin with or without immunoglobulin alters mortality rates from PIV3 pneumonia or decreases the duration of viral shedding from the nasopharynx [28]. Nevertheless, there may be a role for pre-emptive early therapy with ribavirin to prevent progression of upper airway infection to pneumonia.
2.4 Adenovirus
Adenovirus (family Adenoviridae) multiplies in the pharynx, conjunctiva or small intestine. Clinically, the infection is localised and typically presents with pharyngitis, conjunctivitis or gastroenteritis depending on serotype. However, in young infants and immunocompromised patients such as organ transplant recipients or AIDS patients, adenovirus can cause severe pneumonia, disseminated infection or haemorrhagic cystitis. The diagnosis can be confirmed by specific antigen detection tests on respiratory or stool samples. Viremia and viruria can be confirmed and quantified using real-time PCR.
In respiratory infections, the virus spreads via droplets or through contaminated hands or fomites. Nosocomial adenovirus infections have been reported and can be a particular problem in neonatal units. It is important to adhere to strict infection control procedures to prevent nosocomial spread (Table 20.2). In vitro, adenovirus is susceptible to antivirals such as cidofovir and ribavirin [29]. Use of cidofovir in selected patients may be successful [30].
2.5 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Coronavirus
A respiratory virus that caused a severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) emerged from southern China in 2002. The virus was subsequently identified as a novel virus from the Coronaviridae family and was named SARS coronavirus (SARS CoV) [31]. SARS was associated with a high mortality rate, and of the most concern to the international community was the potential in causing nosocomial infections. From a single index case in a Hong Kong hotel, a series of chains of outbreaks occurred in Vietnam, Singapore and Canada [32]. Subsequently, infections were reported in major cities in Asia, Europe and USA, transmitted through international travel. In total, 8,422 individuals were infected, with 916 deaths around the world. The emergence of SARS was the first wake-up call to the medical community regarding the need for comprehensive infection control policies in hospitals and ICU. This also led to the general provision of personal protective equipment (PPE) with training and fitting programmes for health care workers in many countries.
SARS is infectious from the onset of illness and infectiousness correlates with the degree of viral shedding. Incidences of superspreaders or superspreading events may have accounted for most of the large-scale transmissions. Older age and underlying comorbidity are major risk factors for fatality [33]. Viral loads in various anatomical sites also correlate with the severity of symptoms and mortality. Shedding of SARS CoV peaks at day 10 after the onset of symptoms. The disease pathology is characterized by uncontrolled viral replication, with a major proinflammatory response. The optimal therapy for SARS is still not clear, as there were no randomized controlled trials conducted. Treatment with interferon (IFN)-α, steroid, protease inhibitors (such as lopinavir) together with ribavirin, or convalescent plasma containing neutralising antibody, could all be useful. Prophylaxis with IFN or hyperimmunoglobulin may also be considered as postexposure prophylaxis [34].
SARS CoV is identified as a zoonosis with a natural reservoir in Chinese horseshoe bats [35]. Its emergence is associated with local culinary practice in southern China, leading to captured palm civets acting as the amplifying host and passing on infection to human. As long as the reservoirs and amplifying hosts coexist, there is a potential for SARS to re-emerge. Intensivists should always be on the lookout for patients with unexplained severe respiratory infections and consider SARS as a possible differential diagnosis.
2.6 Varicella Zoster Virus: Chickenpox
Primary varicella zoster virus (VZV) (family Herpesviridae) infection causes chickenpox. This is a common self-limiting childhood infection characterised by a mild fever and a generalised vesicular rash. Risk factors for severe disease include immunosuppression, smoking and pregnancy. Complications include bacterial sepsis, pneumonia, encephalitis, ataxia, toxic shock, necrotising fasciitis and haemorrhagic chickenpox with disseminated coagulopathy and fatality [36].
Chickenpox is highly infectious and can be transmitted via inhalation of respiratory secretions or by direct contact. Patients are likely to be infective 48 h before the appearance of the rash until the last lesion has crusted over. Outbreaks in the ICU have frequently been reported [37, 38]. Infected patients should be promptly isolated, preferably in negative-pressure rooms.
A rapid diagnosis of chickenpox can be made by electron microscopy or immunofluorescence of scrapings from the vesicle base. A person who has had chickenpox does not develop chickenpox again, but the virus may reactivate as zoster/shingles. Susceptibility to chickenpox can be determined by testing for the presence of VZV immunoglobulin (Ig)G. Infected patients need to be isolated immediately, and exposed patients and staff investigated. Exposed staff who are susceptible to VZV should be excluded from contact with high-risk patients for 8–21 days postexposure. Susceptible individuals at risk of severe disease should receive varicella-zoster immunoglobulin (VZIG) prophylaxis, which could be given up to 10 days after exposure.
Neonates born to mothers who developed chickenpox 7 days before to 7 days after delivery are highly susceptible due to a lack of protective maternal antibodies. In such cases, VZIG prophylaxis to the neonate is recommended. The baby should also be isolated. Intravenously administered acyclovir should be started promptly at the first sign of illness. Most childhood chickenpox does not require treatment. However, in severe cases (e.g. pneumonitis, disseminated disease with visceral involvement and patients requiring hospitalisation), intravenously administered acyclovir (10 mg/kg 8 hourly) is the treatment of choice. Treatment of neonates will require a higher dose (20 mg/kg 8 hourly). A live attenuated vaccine against VZV is available. Susceptible health care workers should be immunised.
3 Viruses Transmitted by the Faecal–Oral Route
3.1 Rotavirus
Rotavirus (family Reoviridae) is highly infectious and a significant cause of nosocomial gastroenteritis, particularly in children <5 years of age. Patients present with sudden onset of fever, vomiting, abdominal pain and watery diarrhoea. Due to the high viral shedding in the faeces, a diagnosis can be easily obtained using antigen-detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or electron microscopy.
In temperate climates the infection is seasonal with peaks in winter, and hospital outbreaks often coincide with outbreaks in the community. In Europe, it was found that 49–63% of paediatric nosocomial gastroenteritis was positive for rotavirus, with an incidence of 1–2.3 per 1,000 hospital days, leading to prolonged hospitalisation between 1.5 and 4.5 days [39]. Very sick infants with gastroenteritis may require intensive care and could, in turn, be the source of nosocomial infection in ICU. Premature and very low birth weight infants (<1,500 g) are particularly at risk, as severe complications such as necrotising enterocolitis and intestinal perforation are commonly reported. A Dutch study found that amongst all nosocomially acquired viral infections in NICUs, 10% were due to rotavirus, which demonstrates the importance of this infection in the ICU setting [40].
Nosocomial rotavirus infections in adults have also been reported and occasionally cause serious complications in the elderly and immunosuppressed patients. Nosocomial transmission has been previously associated with ungloved nasogastric feeding, contaminated toys, shortage of nurses, overcrowding and high patient turnover. Adherence to effective infection control measures (hand hygiene, enteric precautions; Table 20.3), as well as adequate staffing and patient cohorting/isolation can therefore help prevent or manage an outbreak [41]. The recently developed rotavirus vaccine could substantially reduce the incidence of nosocomial infections [42].
3.2 Norovirus
Norovirus (family Caliciviridae) is the most common cause of nosocomial outbreaks of gastroenteritis. Symptoms typically comprise profuse diarrhoea and projectile vomiting. The diagnosis can be confirmed by ELISA, RT-PCR or electron microscopy of stool samples. Noroviruses are highly infectious and are usually transmitted by direct contact via the faecal–oral route or via oropharyngeal exposure to aerosolised vomit. A number of outbreaks have recently been described in NICUs involving mainly premature neonates, some of whom developed necrotising enterocolitis. Neonates and immunocompromised patients can shed the virus for a prolonged time over months, which emphasises the need for rigorous adherence to effective infection control measures (Table 20.3). Additional measures such as increased hand hygiene and wiping of floors and incubators with agents active against caliciviruses have been proven to be particularly useful in controlling outbreaks in NICU wards [43].
3.3 Enteroviruses and Parechoviruses
Both enteroviruses and parechoviruses (family Picornaviridae) have numerous subtypes. Enteroviruses include polioviruses, coxsackieviruses, echoviruses and other numbered enteroviruses. There are as many as 14 types of human parechoviruses [44]. Parechovirus type 3, in particular, can cause severe infection in young infants [45].
Both viruses are significant causes of nosocomial infections, particularly in the NICU. Enterovirus outbreaks involving up to 23 neonates have been reported [46], and an attack rate of 29% was reported. Enterovirus infections can present as neonatal sepsis, meningoencephalitis, myocarditis, hepatitis or gastroenteritis. Necrotising enterocolitis with pneumatosis intestinalis is a known complication in neonates. Some enteroviruses, such as Enterovirus 71, can cause severe and fatal illness in older children. Parechoviruses can cause meningoencephalitis [47] and a sepsis syndrome in young infants [48]. Enteroviruses and parechoviruses are genetically distinct from each other and require a different RT-PCR for diagnosis. Sequencing of the gene encoding the VP1 region of the virus has been used to identify outbreak strains.
With the global polio eradication programme, poliomyelitis is no longer a common nosocomial infection, although health care workers in the ICU who may be in contact with live vaccine poliovirus shedding infants should ensure that they are immunised.
Rigorous hand washing (Table 20.3) is the most important measure during an outbreak. Cohort nursing, source isolation and screening are other measures frequently used (Table 20.3). Clearance of the virus by the host is antibody-mediated and many have advocated the use of normal human immunoglobulin (NHIG).
3.4 Hepatitis A Virus
Hepatitis A virus (family Picornaviridae) belongs to the same family as enteroviruses and is usually transmitted via the faecal–oral route. Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis A virus is well documented. An outbreak in an adult ICU (AICU) occurred as a result of inadequate precautions taken while handling bile of a patient not suspected of incubating hepatitis A [49]. Most other outbreaks occurred in PICUs or NICUs, with attack rates varying between 15 and 25%. Risk factors for outbreaks have been attributed to handling soiled bed pads, nappies or gowns of an index patient, failure to wash hands, and eating in the ICU. In the NICU, vertical transmission and blood transfusion have been implicated as the cause of infection in the index case. The effect of nosocomial hepatitis A infection varies from asymptomatic to classic presentation with acute hepatitis. Diagnosis is by serological detection of hepatitis-A-specific IgM. The use of molecular techniques such as RT-PCR can help identify early infection or in difficult cases, such as those with immunodeficiency. Sequencing of PCR products is useful in establishing epidemiological linkage during outbreaks. NHIG has been successfully used for postexposure prophylaxis to control outbreaks. There is now increasing evidence that hepatitis A vaccine can be used for prophylaxis if the contact occurs within 14 days from onset of illness in the index case [50].
4 Viruses Transmitted by Blood and Body Fluid
The most commonly encountered nosocomial blood-borne viruses are hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The main risks are transmission from patients to health care workers. However, transmissions between patients and from health care workers to patients have been reported. The best way to prevent occupational exposure of blood-borne viruses is to practice universal precautions. Blood and body fluids (Table 20.4) from any patient, whether or not there are identifiable risk factors, should be considered as a potential risk. This encourages good and safe practice and helps prevent unnecessary accidents. Physical isolation of patients with blood-borne virus infection is generally not necessary unless there is profuse uncontrolled bleeding. Infection-control teams and occupational health departments should adopt a proactive approach to educate and prevent sharps injury (Table 20.5). There should also be specific instructions on how to deal with blood and body fluid exposure (Table 20.6).
4.1 Hepatitis B Virus
HBV is the most infectious of the three common blood-borne viruses. The risk of transmission depends on the viral load of the source patient. An HBV-infected individual with hepatitis B “e” antigen (HBeAg) tends to have a high viral load and is therefore more infectious than carriers without HBeAg. Estimate of infectivity ranges from 2% (HBeAg absent) to 40% (HBeAg present). All health care workers should be immunised against HBV. Exposed health care workers who are susceptible (not immunised or vaccine nonresponders) should receive hepatitis B immunoglobulin for postexposure prophylaxis. A booster dose of vaccine should be given to those exposed individual who had previously been successfully immunised.
4.2 Hepatitis C Virus
HCV is probably the commonest blood-borne virus encountered in Western countries. In the UK over a 3-year period, 462 incidences of occupational exposure to HCV were reported in comparison with 293 of HIV and 151 of HBV [51]. Follow-up studies of health care workers who sustained a percutaneous exposure to blood from a patient known to have HCV infection have reported an average incidence of seroconversion of 1.8% (range 0–7%). No vaccine or postexposure prophylaxis was available to prevent HCV transmission. Early diagnosis is essential, as early interferon treatment after seroconversion has a high success rate for eradication [52]. Exposed health care workers should be followed up at 6 and 12 weeks for HCV RNA testing and promptly referred for treatment if found infected.
4.3 Human Immunodeficiency Virus
The average risk of HIV transmission after percutaneous exposure to HIV-infected blood is about 0.3%. After mucocutaneous exposure, the risk is estimated to be <0.1%. A case-control study [53] identified four factors with increased risk of transmission:
-
deep injury;
-
visible blood on the device that caused the injury;
-
injury with a needle that has been placed in a source patient’s artery or vein;
-
terminal HIV-related illness in the source patient.
This study also showed that the use of zidovudine prophylaxis reduce the risk of transmission by 80%. Postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) should therefore be offered to all health care workers who have significant exposure to blood or body fluid from a patient known to be at high risk of or to have HIV infection. Various PEP options are available depending on national recommendations. This should be started as soon as possible after exposure and continued for 4 weeks.
4.4 Viral Haemorrhagic Fevers
Viral haemorrhagic fevers (VHFs) are severe and life-threatening diseases caused by a range of viruses. They are either zoonotic or arthropod-borne infections and are often endemic in certain parts of the world. They are often highly infectious through close contact with infected blood and body fluid and therefore pose a significant risk of hospital-acquired infection. As many patients with VHF present with shock and require vigorous supportive treatment, it is a potential problem in the ICU. The major viruses of nosocomial concern in this setting are Marburg, Ebola, Rift Valley fever, Lassa and Crimean Congo haemorrhagic fever (Table 20.7). The incubation period for these VHFs ranges from 3–21 days. Initial symptoms are often nonspecific but may eventually lead to haemorrhage and shock. Any febrile patient who has returned from an endemic area of one of the VHF agents or has a history of contact with cases suspected to have VHF within 3 weeks should be considered as at risk. However, malaria should always be excluded. A risk assessment needs to be performed, and any patient known or strongly suspected to be suffering from VHF should be admitted to a high-security infectious disease unit that is designed to manage these patients. While awaiting transfer to a secure unit, such patients should be placed in a negative-pressure room with strict source isolation. Specimens for patient management should be processed in a high-security laboratory designated for category 4 pathogens, and the aetiological agent established using PCR, serology and virus culture. All areas and materials in contact with infected patients should be autoclaved, incinerated or treated with hypochlorite (10,000 ppm of available chlorine). If the patient dies, the body should be placed in a sealable body bag sprayed or wiped with hypochlorite. Individuals who have been in contact with a case of VHF should be put under surveillance for 3 weeks. The successful i.v. use of ribavirin has been reported in some cases of VHFs (Lassa, Crimean Congo haemorrhagic fever and Hantaan). Apart from yellow fever, no vaccines are available.
5 Viruses Transmitted by Direct Contact
5.1 Varicella Zoster Virus; Shingles
Shingles or zoster is the result of the reactivation of latent VZV (family Herpesviridae) in the dorsal root or cranial nerve ganglia. The clinical presentation is a painful vesicular eruption covering the affected dermatome. The clinical diagnosis can be confirmed rapidly by immunofluorescence, electron microscopy or PCR of the cellular material obtained from a vesicular scraping. The infection is usually self-limiting but can be more severe in immunocompromised patients, in whom it may present over multiple dermatomes or as a disseminated infection. The latter cases should be managed as if they were chickenpox, and respiratory precautions for infection control have to be enforced.
Patients or health care staff members with classic shingles are contagious from the day the rash appears until the lesions are crusted over. There is some risk of nosocomial transmission if the lesions are on exposed areas of the body or in immunocompromised infected patients. Nonimmune (VZV-IgG negative) patients or health care staff members with no history of chickenpox are susceptible if they have close contact with shingles and should be managed as described for chickenpox contact.
5.2 Herpes Simplex Virus
The herpes simplex virus (HSV) (family Herpesviridae) consist of two types: HSV-1 and HSV-2. Clinically, they most commonly manifest with oral (mainly HSV-1) or genital (mainly HSV-2) ulcerations/vesicles, and reactivation is common, particularly in the ICU. Other presentations include keratitis, encephalitis, meningitis, herpetic whitlow or neonatal infection.
The diagnosis can be confirmed rapidly by immunofluorescence, electron microscopy or PCR of vesicle/ulcer scrapings. In the immunocompromised patient, HSV can cause life-threatening disseminated infection and, early treatment with acyclovir i.v. is recommended. It has also been suggested that occult herpes virus reactivation may increase the mortality risk of ICU patients [54].
As the infected lesions contain virus, there is an increased risk of nosocomial transmission until the lesions have crusted over. Standard isolation precautions should be in place to reduce transmission (Table 20.2). Patients with active lesions should be nursed away from high-risk patients (i.e. immunocompromised, severe eczema, burns, or neonates). As patients can be asymptomatic secretors, health care workers should wear gloves when dealing with mucosal secretions (i.e. saliva) to avoid infections such as herpetic whitlow. Infected staff should cover lesions if possible and should not attend those at risk.
Neonatal herpes is usually transmitted from mother to the child at the time of delivery and may not be noticed until the infant develops the disease. Universal precautions, in particularly, hand washing, should always be in place to reduce transmission of infection. To contain or prevent an outbreak, infected cases should be cohorted and nursed by dedicated staff who will not attend noninfected infants.
5.3 Rabies Virus
Rabies virus (family Rhabdoviridae) is usually transmitted to humans following exposure to saliva of a rabid animal (e.g. dog, fox, bat) via a bite or scratch, but only 40% of exposed people develop disease. The virus spreads from the wound to the central nervous system causing fatal encephalitis, and the virus may be present in the patient’s saliva, skin, eye, and brain tissue. The diagnosis can be confirmed by demonstrating the virus directly in brain tissue or saliva by RT-PCR or by immunofluorescence detection of antigen in skin biopsies from the nape of the neck. Due to the severe and paralysing effect, patients may be admitted to the ICU. To date, no case of nosocomial transmission has been reported apart from two patients who received corneal transplants from infected donors. Suspected or proven cases should be placed in standard isolation and appropriate precautions taken when dealing with potential infectious secretions (e.g. wearing of mask if dealing with oral secretions). Any health care worker with a significant exposure (e.g. splash of secretion onto mucosa or broken skin) should receive rabies vaccine and specific immunoglobulin.
6 Summary
Viral infection can cause significant morbidity and mortality and has the potential to result in cross infection, involving patients as well as health care workers. Good infection-control practice is essential to prevent nosocomial infection. Intensivists should be on the alert for important viruses causing infections according to age group of patients and mode of transmission and should never be complacent. Good liaison with the laboratory is essential for determining correct diagnostic tests and timely report of results to help in patient management.
References
Fitzgerald DA (2009) Human swine influenza A. Paediatr Respir Rev 10:154–158
Trifonov V, Khiabanian H, Rabadan R (2009) Geographic dependence, surveillance, and origins of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus. N Engl J Med 361:115–119
Webb SA, Pettila V, Seppelt I et al (2009) Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand. N Engl J Med 361:1925–1934
Itoh Y, Shinya K, Kiso M et al (2009) In vitro and in vivo characterization of new swine-origin H1N1 influenza viruses. Nature 460:1021–1025
Writing committee of the WHO consultation on clinical aspects of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza (2010) Clinical aspects of pandemic 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) virus infection. N Engl J Med 362:1708–1719
Siston AM, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA et al (2010) Pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus illness among pregnant women in the United States. JAMA 303:1517–1525
Campbell A, Rodin R, Kropp R et al (2010) Risk of severe outcomes among patients admitted to hospital with pandemic (H1N1) influenza. CMAJ 182:349–355
Hanslik T, Boelle PY, Flahault A (2010) Preliminary estimation of risk factors for admission to intensive care units and for death in patients infected with A(H1N1)2009 influenza virus, France, 2009–2010. PLoS Curr. 2010 March 9; 2:RRN1150
Anonymous (2009) Bacterial coinfections in lung tissue specimens from fatal cases of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1)–United States, May–August 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58:1071–1074
Anonymous (2009) Evaluation of rapid influenza diagnostic tests for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) virus–United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58:826–829
Ellis J, Iturriza M, Allen R et al (2009) Evaluation of four real-time PCR assays for detection of influenza A (H1N1) viruses. Euro Surveill 14(22): pii: 19230
Flagg A, Danziger-Isakov L, Foster C et al (2010) Novel 2009 H1N1 influenza virus infection requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a pediatric heart transplant recipient. J Heart Lung Transpl 29:582–584
Christian MD, Joynt GM, Hick JL et al (2010) Critical care triage. Recommendations and standard operating procedures for intensive care unit and hospital preparations for an influenza epidemic or mass disaster. Intensive Care Med 36(Suppl 1):S55–S64
Jain S, Kamimoto L, Bramley AM et al (2009) Hospitalized patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza in the United States, April–June 2009. N Engl J Med 361:1935–1944
Taylor BL, Montgomery HE, Rhodes A, Sprung CL (2010) Protection of patients and staff during a pandemic. Recommendations and standard operating procedures for intensive care unit and hospital preparations for an influenza epidemic or mass disaster. Intensive Care Med 36(Suppl 1):S45–S54
Cheng VC, Tai JW, Wong LM et al (2010) Prevention of nosocomial transmission of swine-origin pandemic influenza virus A/H1N1 by infection control bundle. J Hosp Infect 74:271–277
Reiche J, Schweiger B (2009) Genetic variability of group A human respiratory syncytial virus strains circulating in Germany from 1998 to 2007. J Clin Microbiol 47:1800–1810
Berger TM, Aebi C, Duppenthaler A, Stocker M (2009) Prospective population-based study of RSV-related intermediate care and intensive care unit admissions in Switzerland over a 4-year period (2001–2005). Infection 37:109–116
Caram LB, Chen J, Taggart EW et al (2009) Respiratory syncytial virus outbreak in a long-term care facility detected using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction: an argument for real-time detection methods. J Am Geriatr Soc 57:482–485
Gadsby NJ, Hardie A, Claas EC, Templeton KE (2010) Comparison of the Luminex RVP Fast assay with in-house real-time PCR for respiratory viral diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol 48:2213–2216
Lavergne V, Ghannoum M, Weiss K et al (2011) Successful prevention of respiratory syncytial virus nosocomial transmission following an enhanced seasonal infection control program. Bone Marrow Transpl 46(1):137–142
Morris SK, Dzolganovski B, Beyene J, Sung L (2009) A meta-analysis of the effect of antibody therapy for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection. BMC Infect Dis 9:106
Falsey AR, Walsh EE (2000) Respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults. Clin Microbiol Rev 13:371–384
Boeckh M, Englund J, Li Y et al (2007) Randomized controlled multicenter trial of aerosolized ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus upper respiratory tract infection in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis 44:245–249
Chavez-Bueno S, Mejias A, Merryman RA et al (2007) Intravenous palivizumab and ribavirin combination for respiratory syncytial virus disease in high-risk pediatric patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J 26:1089–1093
Terlizzi ME, Massimiliano B, Francesca S et al (2009) Quantitative RT real time PCR and indirect immunofluorescence for the detection of human parainfluenza virus 1, 2, 3. J Virol Methods 160:172–177
Maziarz RT, Sridharan P, Slater S et al (2010) Control of an outbreak of human parainfluenza virus 3 in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 16:192–198
Nichols WG, Corey L, Gooley T et al (2001) Parainfluenza virus infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors, response to antiviral therapy, and effect on transplant outcome. Blood 98:573–578
Lenaerts L, De Clercq E, Naesens L (2008) Clinical features and treatment of adenovirus infections. Rev Med Virol 18:357–374
Williams KM, Agwu AL, Dabb AA et al (2009) A clinical algorithm identifies high risk pediatric oncology and bone marrow transplant patients likely to benefit from treatment of adenoviral infection. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 31:825–831
Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith CS et al (2003) A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 348:1953–1966
Poutanen SM, Low DE, Henry B et al (2003) Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. N Engl J Med 348:1995–2005
Lau EH, Hsiung CA, Cowling BJ et al (2010) A comparative epidemiologic analysis of SARS in Hong Kong, Beijing and Taiwan. BMC Infect Dis 10:50
Wong SS, Yuen KY (2008) The management of coronavirus infections with particular reference to SARS. J Antimicrob Chemother 62:437–441
Cheng VC, Lau SK, Woo PC, Yuen KY (2007) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:660–694
Cameron JC, Allan G, Johnston F et al (2007) Severe complications of chickenpox in hospitalised children in the UK and Ireland. Arch Dis Child 92:1062–1066
Aly NY, Al Obaid I, Al-Qulooshi N, Zahed Z (2007) Occupationally related outbreak of chickenpox in an intensive care unit. Med Princ Pract 16:399–401
Apisarnthanarak A, Kitphati R, Tawatsupha P et al (2007) Outbreak of varicella-zoster virus infection among Thai healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 28:430–434
Fruhwirth M, Heininger U, Ehlken B et al (2001) International variation in disease burden of rotavirus gastroenteritis in children with community- and nosocomially acquired infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 20:784–791
Verboon-Maciolek MA, Krediet TG, Gerards LJ et al (2005) Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of viral infections in a neonatal intensive care unit during a 12-year period. Pediatr Infect Dis J 24:901–904
Boyce JM, Pittet D (2002) Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings. Recommendations of the healthcare infection control practices Advisory Committee and the HIPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Am J Infect Control 30:S1–S46
Cunliffe NA, Both JA, Lowe SJ et al (2010) Healthcare-associated viral gastroenteritis among children in a large pediatric hospital, United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis 16:55–62
Armbrust S, Kramer A, Olbertz D et al (2009) Norovirus infections in preterm infants: wide variety of clinical courses. BMC Res Notes 2:96
Nix WA, Maher K, Pallansch MA, Oberste MS (2010) Parechovirus typing in clinical specimens by nested or semi-nested PCR coupled with sequencing. J Clin Virol 48:202–207
Harvala H, Robertson I, Chieochansin T et al (2009) Specific association of human parechovirus type 3 with sepsis and fever in young infants, as identified by direct typing of cerebrospinal fluid samples. J Infect Dis 199:1753–1760
Takami T, Sonodat S, Houjyo H et al (2000) Diagnosis of horizontal enterovirus infections in neonates by nested PCR and direct sequence analysis. J Hosp Infect 45:283–287
Gupta S, Fernandez D, Siddiqui A et al (2010) Extensive white matter abnormalities associated with neonatal Parechovirus (HPeV) infection. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 14(6):531–534
Benschop KS, Schinkel J, Minnaar RP et al (2006) Human parechovirus infections in Dutch children and the association between serotype and disease severity. Clin Infect Dis 42:204–210
Hanna JN, Loewenthal MR, Negel P, Wenck DJ (1996) An outbreak of hepatitis A in an intensive care unit. Anaesth Intensive Care 24:440–444
Victor JC, Monto AS, Surdina TY et al (2007) Hepatitis A vaccine versus immune globulin for postexposure prophylaxis. N Engl J Med 357:1685–1694
Evans B, Duggan W, Baker J et al (2001) Exposure of healthcare workers in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland to bloodborne viruses between July 1997 and June 2000: analysis of surveillance data. BMJ 322:397–398
Maheshwari A, Thuluvath PJ (2010) Management of acute hepatitis C. Clin Liver Dis 14:169–176
Cardo DM, Culver DH, Ciesielski CA et al (1997) A case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after percutaneous exposure. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Needlestick Surveillance Group. N Engl J Med 337:1485–1490
Cook CH, Martin LC, Yenchar JK et al (2003) Occult herpes family viral infections are endemic in critically ill surgical patients. Crit Care Med 31:1923–1929
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tong, C.Y.W., Schelenz, S. (2011). Clinical Virology in NICU, PICU and AICU. In: van Saene, H., Silvestri, L., de la Cal, M., Gullo, A. (eds) Infection Control in the Intensive Care Unit. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1601-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1601-9_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1600-2
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1601-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)