Skip to main content

Agency and Inter-agency, Action and Joint Action: Theoretical and Neuropsychological Evidence

  • Chapter
Neuropsychology of the Sense of Agency

Abstract

Agency deals with action, self-consciousness, and causality dimensions as a constitutive and pervasive aspect of human experience. The self is not a static entity but most of the time is an acting-self. To be an agent means to be in action and to encounter objects or subjects to interact with.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van den Bos E, Jeannerod M (2002) Sense of body and sense of action both contribute to self-recognition. Cognition 85:177–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gallagher S (2000) Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn Sci 4:14–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  4. Newen A, Vogeley K (2003) Self-representation: searching for a neural signature of self-consciousness. Conscious Cogn 12:529–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gallagher S, Zahavi D (2009) Phenomenological approaches to self-consciousness. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2009 ed., http://plato.stanford. edu/archives/spr2009/entries/self-consciousness-phenomenological/

    Google Scholar 

  6. Searle JR (1990) Collective intentions and actions. In: Cohen PR, Morgan J, Pollak ME (eds) Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 401–415

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bratman ME (1992) Shared cooperative activity. Philos Rev 101:327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crivelli D, Balconi M (2009) Trends in social neuroscience: from biological motion to joint actions. Neuropsychol Trends 6:71–93

    Google Scholar 

  9. Knoblich G, Sebanz N (2006) The social nature of perception and action. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Jaegher H (2009) Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. Conscious Cogn 18:535–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallagher S (2008) Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Conscious Cogn 17:535–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meltzoff AN, Moore MK (1997) Explaining facial imitation: a theoretical model. Early Dev Parent 6:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallese V, Goldman A (1998) Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn Sci 2:493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grèzes J, Decety J (2001) Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 12:1–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Annet J (1996) On knowing how to do things: a theory of motor imagery. Cogn Brain Res 3:65–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meltzoff AN (1999) Origins of theory of mind, cognition and communication. J Commun Disord 32:251–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pacherie E, Dokic J (2006) From mirror neurons to joint actions. Cogn Syst Res 7:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G (2006) Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci 10:70–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blakemore S-J, Decety J (2001) From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:561–567

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blakemore S-J, Frith CD (2005) The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia 43:260–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fadiga L, Craighero L (2004) Electrophysiology of action representation. J Clin Neurophysiol 21:157–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Léonard G, Tremblay F (2007) Corticomotor facilitation associated with observation, imagery and imitation of hand actions: a comparative study in young and old adults. Exp Brain Res 177:167–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2005) How two share a task: co-representing stimulusresponse mappings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:1234–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sato A, Yasuda A (2005) Illusion of sense of self-agency: discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition 94:241–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Balconi M, Crivelli D (2010) FRN and P300 ERP effect modulation in response to feedback sensitivity: the contribution of punishment-reward system (BIS/BAS) and behaviour identification of action. Neurosci Res 66:162–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Keysers C, Fadiga L (2008) The mirror neuron system: new frontiers. Soc Neurosci 3:193–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kokal I, Gazzola V, Keysers C (2009) Acting together in and beyond the mirror neuron system. Neuroimage 47:2046–2056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Newman-Norlund RD, Bosga J, Meulenbroek RGJ et al (2008) Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: virtual lifting and balancing. Neuroimage 41:169–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Newman-Norlund RD, van Schie HT, van Zuijlen AMJ et al (2007) The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nat Neurosci 10:817–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Semin GR, Cacioppo JT (2009) From embodied representation to co-regulation. In: Pineda JA (ed) Mirror neuron systems. Humana Press, New York, NY, pp 107–120

    Google Scholar 

  31. Seemann A (2009) Joint agency: intersubjectivity, sense of control, and the feeling of trust. Inquiry 52:500–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Newen A (2008) Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Conscious Cogn 17:219–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chisholm R (1995) Agents, causes and events: the problem of free will. In: O’Connor T (ed) Agents, causes, and events: essays on indeterminism and free will Oxford University Press, New York, pp 95–100

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sebanz N (2007) The emergence of self: sensing agency through joint action. J Conscious Stud 14:234–251

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wolpert DM (1997) Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cogn Sci 1:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chaminade T, Decety J (2002) Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency. Neuroreport 13:1975–1978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Farrer C, Franck N, Georgieff N et al (2003) Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage 18:324–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Farrer C, Frith CD (2002) Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. Neuroimage 15:596–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fink GR, Marshall JC, Halligan PW et al (1999) The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain 122:497–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McDonald PA, Paus T (2003) The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cereb Cortex 13:962–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Preston C, Newport R (2008) Misattribution of movement agency following right parietal TMS. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 3:26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sirigu A, Daprati E, Ciancia S et al (2003) Altered awareness of voluntary action after damage to the parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 7:80–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sirigu A, Daprati E, Pradat-Diehl P et al (1999) Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesions. Brain 122:1867–1874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Spence SA, Brooks DJ, Hirsch SR et al (1997) A PET study of voluntary movement in schizophrenic patients experiencing passivity phenomena (delusions of alien control). Brain 120:1997–2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Blakemore S-J, Wolpert DM, Frith CD (2002) Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends Cogn Sci 6:237–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Frith CD (1992) The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  47. David N, Newen A, Vogeley K (2008) The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Conscious Cogn 17:523–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Frith CD, Blakemore S-J, Wolpert DM (2000) Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355:1771–1788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fletcher P, McKenna PJ, Friston KJ et al (1999) Abnormal cingulate modulation of frontotemporal connectivity in schizophrenia. Neuroimage 9:337–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Georgieff N, Jeannerod M (1998) Beyond consciousness of external reality: a “Who” system for consciousness of action and self-consciousness. Conscious Cogn 7:465–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Vogeley K, Fink GR (2003) Neural correlates of the first-person-perspective. Trends Cogn Sci 7:38–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Allison T, Puce A, McCarthy G (2000) Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn Sci 4:267–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Adolphs R (2001) The neurobiology of social cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:231–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crivelli, D., Balconi, M. (2010). Agency and Inter-agency, Action and Joint Action: Theoretical and Neuropsychological Evidence. In: Michela, B. (eds) Neuropsychology of the Sense of Agency. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1587-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics