Advertisement

The Monitoring of Experience and Agency in Daily Life: A Study with Italian Adolescents

  • Marta Bassi
  • Raffaela D. G. Sartori
  • Antonella Delle Fave

Abstract

The sense of agency is defined as the “experience of oneself as the agent of one’s own action” ([1], p. 523). It means being the one causing a specific movement or generating a certain thought in the stream of consciousness [2]. This ability implies distinguishing actions that are self-generated from those generated by others [1], thus contributing to the subjective phenomenon of self-consciousness [2, 3, 4]. Moreover, being the initiator of an action entails representation of oneself as causally responsible for the action and for its direct effects [5].

Keywords

Human Agency Conscious Experience Daily Experience Optimal Experience Mastery Goal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    David N, Newen A, Vogeley K (2008) The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Conscious Cogn 17:523–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gallagher S, (2000) Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn Sci 4:14–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Georgieff N, Jeannerod M (1998) Beyond consciousness of external reality: a “Who” system for consciousness of action and self-consciousness. Conscious Cogn 7:465–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pacherie E, Jeannerod M (2004) Agency, simulation and self-determination. Mind Lang 19:113–146Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Synofzik M, Gottfried V, Newen A (2008) Beyond the comparator model: a multifactoral two-step account of agency. Conscious Cogn 17:219–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J (2002) Voluntary actions and conscious awareness. Nat Neurosci 5:382–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haggard P, Clark S (2003) Intentional action: conscious experience and neural prediction. Conscious Cogn 12:695–707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Searle J (1983) Intentionality. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aart H, Custer R, Wegner (2005) On the inference of personal authorship: enhancing experienced agency by priming effect information. Conscious Cogn 14:439–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wegner D, Sparrow B (2004) Authorship processing. In: Cazzaniga MS (ed) The new cognitive neuroscience (third ed.). MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blakemore SJ, Frith CD, Wolpert D (1999) Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. J Cognitive Neurosci 11:551–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsakiris M, Prabhu G, Haggard P (2006) Having a body versus moving your body: how agency structures body-ownership. Conscious Cogn 15:423–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blakemore SJ, Frith C.D, Wolpert DM (2001) The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action. Neuroreport 12:1879–1884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farrer C, Frith CD (2002) Experiencing oneself vs. another person as being the cause of the action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. Neuroimage 15:596–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Farrer C, Franck N, Frith CD et al (2003) Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage 18:324–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fink GR, Marshall JC, Halligan PW et al (1999) The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain 122:497–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jannerod M (2004) Visual and action cues contribute to the self-other distinction. Nat Neurosci 7:442–423Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leube DT, Knoblich G, Erb M et al (2003) The neural correlates of perceiving one’s own movements. Neuroimage 20:2084–2090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bandura (1986) Social foundation of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Premice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bandura (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 52:1–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bandura A (2006) Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspect Psychological Sci 1:164–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baltes MM (1996) The many faces of dependency in old age. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brandtstadter J (1992) Personal control over development: implication of self-efficacy. In: Schwarzer R (ed) Self-efficacy: through control of action. Hemisphere, Washington DC, pp 127–145Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ozer EM (1995) The impact of childcare responsibility and self-efficacy on the psychological health of working mother. Psychol Women Quart 19:315–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bandura A (2000) Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 9:75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bandura A (1997) Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pastorelli C, Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C et al (2001) The structure of children’s perceived self-efficacy: a cross National study. Eur J Psychol Assess 17:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bassi M, Steca P, Delle Fave A, Caprara GV (2007) Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. J Youth Adolescence 36:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Deci EL, Ryan RM (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq 11:227–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bandura A (1989) Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal system. In: Pervin L (ed) Goal concepts in personality and social psychology. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Deci EL (1975) Intrinsic motivation. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Csikszentmihalyi M (2000) Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (Original work published in 1975)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    deCharms R (1968) Personal causation: the internal affective determinants of behavior. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    de Charms R (1983) Personal causation.Erlbaum, New Jersey (original work published in 1968)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Deci EL, Ryan RM (1991) A motivational approach to self: integration in personality. In: Dienstbier R (ed) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on motivation Vol. 38. University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln pp 237–288Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Markus HR, Kitayama S (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychol Rev 98:224–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hernandez M, Iyengar SS (2001) What drives whom? A cultural perspective on human agency. Soc Cognition 19:269–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nisbett RE, Peng K, Choi I, Norenzayan A (2000) Culture and system of thought: holistic vs. analytic cognition. Unpublished manuscript, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Norenzayan A, Nisbett RE (2000) Culture and causal cognition. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 9:132–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Peng K, Ames D, Knowles E (2002) Culture and human inference. In: Matsumoto D (ed) Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Masuda T, Nisbett RE (1999) Culture and attention to object versus field. Unpublished manuscript, Ann Arbor, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Miller JG (1984) Culture and the development of the everyday social explanation. J Pers Soc Psychol 46:961–978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Morris MW, Peng K (1994) Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. J Pers Social Psychol 67:949–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shweder RA, Bourne AJ (1984) Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In: Shweder RA, LeVine RA (eds) Culture theory: essay on mind, self, and emotion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 158–199Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Menon T, Morris MW, Chiu CY, Hong YY (1999) Culture and construal of agency: attribution to individual versus group dispositions. J Pers Soc Psychol 76:701–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Peng K, Nisbett RE (1999) Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. Am Psychol 54:741–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Shweder RA (2003) Why do men barbeque? Recipes for cultural psychology. Harvard University Press Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sen A (1987) On ethics and economics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sen A (1992) Inequality re-examined. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Deci EL, Ryan RM (2003) On assimilating identities to the self: a self-determination theory perspective on internalization and integrity within cultures. In: Leary MR, Tangney JP (eds) Handbook of self and identity. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nussbaum M (1993) Non relative virtues: an Aristotelian approach. In: Nussbaum M, Sen A (eds) The quality of life. United Nation University and WIDER, Helsinki, pp 242–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Waterman AS, Schwartz SJ Conti R (2006) The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. J Happiness Studies 9:41–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Diamond MC (1988) Enriching heredity. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kolb B, Whishaw IQ (1998) Brain plastic and behavior. Ann Rev Psychol 49:43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    James W (1890) The principles of psychology, vol 2. Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Chalmers DJ (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Consciousness Stud 2:200–219Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Le Doux J (2002) Synaptic self: how our brains become who we are. Viking Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tononi G, Edelman GM (1998) Consciousness and complexity. Science 282:1846–1851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Delle Fave A, Massimini F (2005) The investigation of optimal experience and apathy: developmental and psychosocial implications. Eur Psychol 10:264–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Napa Scollon C, Kim-Prieto C, Diener E (2003) Experience sampling: promises and pitfalls, strenghs and weaknesses. J Happiness Stud 4:5–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gershuny J (2004) Costs and benefits of time sampling technologies. Social Indicators Research 67:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kunnen ES, Bosma HA (2000) Development of meaning making: a dynamic systems approach. New Ideas Psychol 18:57–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Massimini F, Delle Fave A (2000) Individual development in a bio-cultural perspective. Am Psychol 55:24–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Csikszentmihalyi M, Larson R, Prescott S (1977) The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. J Youth Adolescence 6:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Csikszentmihalyi M, Larson R (1984) Being adolescent: conflict and growth in the teenage years. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Csikszentmihalyi M, Larson R (1987) Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. J Nerv Mental Dis 9:526–536Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hektner JM, Schmidt JA, Csikszentmihalyi (2007) Experience sampling method: measuring the quality of everyday life. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Muhr T (1997) ATLAS/ti, User’s Manual and Reference Version 4.1. Scientific Software Development, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Csikszentmihalyi M, Schneider B (2000) Becoming adult: how teachers prepare for the world of works. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Delle Fave A, Massimini F (2004) The cross-cultural investigation of optimal experience. Ric Psicol 27:79–102Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    deVries M (ed) (1992) The experience of psychopathology — Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Larson RW, Richards MH (1994) Divergent realities. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Csikszentmihalyi M, Graef R (1980) The experience of freedom in daily life. Am J Commun Psychol 8:401–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hormuth SE (1986) The sampling experience in situ. J Pers 54:262–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Larson R, Csikszentmihalyi M (1983) The experience sampling method. In: Reis H (ed) New direction for naturalistic methods in behavioural science. Jossey Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hoover MC (1983) Individual differences in the relation of heart rate to self-reports. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Delle Fave A, Massimini F (1988) Modernization and changing context of flow in work and leisure. In: Csikszentmihalyi M, Csikszentmihalyi I (eds.) Optimal experience, psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Clarke S H, Haworth JT (1994) Flow experience in the daily lives of sixth-form college students. Brit J Psychol 85:511–523Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Haworth J, Evans S (1995) Challenge, skill and positive subjective states in the daily life of a sample of YTS students. J Occup Organ Psych 68:109–121Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Larson R, Verna S (1999) How children and adolescence spend time across the world: work, play and development opportunities. Psychol Bull 125:701–736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Persson D, Eklund M, Isacsson A (1999) The experience of everyday occupations and its relation to sense of coherence — a methodological study. J Occup Sci 6:13–26Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Delle Fave A, Bassi M (2000) The quality of experience in adolescents’ daily life: developmental perspectives. Soc Gen Psychol Monogr 126:347–367Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Fianco A, Delle Fave A (2006) Donne migranti e qualità dell’esperienza soggettiva: uno studio con experience sampling method. Passaggi. Rivista Italiana di Scienze Transculturali 11:101–122Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Larson R (1989) Beeping children and adolescents: a method for studying time use and daily experience. J Youth Adolescence 18:511–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Delle Fave A, Bassi M (2003) Italian adolescents and leisure: the role of engagement and optimal experience. In: Verma S, Larson R (eds) Examining adolescent leisure time across cultures: developmental opportunities and risks. New directions in child and adolescent development. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco pp 79–93Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Csikszentmihalyi M, Csikszentmihalyi I (eds) (1988) Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Massimini F, Carli M (1988) The systematic assessment of daily experience. In: Csikszentmihalyi M, Csikszentmihalyi I (eds) Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Massimini F, Csikszentmihalyi M, Carli M (1987) Optimal experience: a tool for psychiatric rehabilitation. J Nerv Ment Dis 175–179Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Csikszentmihalyi M (1997) Intrinsic motivation and effective teaching: a flow analysis. In: Bess J (ed) Teaching well and liking it: motivating faculty to teach effectively. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore pp 72–89Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Delle Fave A (1996) Esperienza ottimale e fluttuazione dello stato di coscienza: risultati sperimentali. In: Massimini F, Inghilleri P, Delle Fave A (eds) La selezione psicologica umana. Cooperativa Libraria IULM, Milano, pp 541–568Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Delle Fave A, Massimini F (1992) The ESM and the measurement of clinical change: a case of anxiety disorder. In: deVries M (ed) The experience of psychopathology: investigating mental disorders in their natural setting. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Frith CD, Blakemore S, Wolpert DM (2000) Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: abnormalities in the awareness of action. Brain Res Rev 31:357–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trend Cogn Sci 4:423–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3:1212–1217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Lanz M, Iafrate R, Marta E, Rosnati R (1999) Significant others: Italian adolescents ranking compared with their parents. Psychol Rep 84:459–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Olivier GGF (2000) Le ludique dans la formation sociale de l’homme: une théorie critique du loisir [Playfulness in the social formation of man: A critical theory of leisure]. Loisir et sociétéGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Li J (2006) Self in learning: Chinese adolescents’ goals and sense of agency. Child Dev 77:482–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Eccles JS, Wigfield A, Schiefele U (1998) Motivation beliefs, values and goals. Annu Rev Psychol 53:109–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Ames C (1992) Classroom: goals, structures, and student motivation. J Educ Psychol 66:950–967Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Duda JL, Nicholls JG (1992) Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. J Educat Psychol 84:290–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Dweck CS (1992) The study of goals in human behavior. Psychol Sci 3:165–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Midgley C (1993) Motivation and middle level schools. In: Maehr ML, Pintrich PR (eds) Advantages in motivation and achievement: motivation and adolescent development, vol 8. CT:JAI, Greenwich, pp 217–274Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Nolen SB (1989) Reasons for studying: motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition Instruct 5:269–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. Am Psychol 55:68–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Sheldon KM, Ryan RM, Deci E, Kasser T (2004) The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: it’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Pers Soc Psychol B 30:475–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Vansteenkiste M, Simons J, Lens W et al (2004) Motivating learning, performance and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. J Pers Soc Psychol 87:246–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Hidi S, Harackiewicz JM (2001) Motivating the academically unmotivated: a critical issue for the 21st century. Rev Educ Res 70:151–180Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Hektner JM (1996) Exploring optimal personality development: a longitudinal study of adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Asakawa K, Csikszentmihalyi M (1998) The quality of experience of Asian American adolescents in activities related to future goals. J Youth Adolesc 27:141–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Nakamura J (1988) Optimal experience and the use of talent. In: Csikszentmihalyi M Csikszentmihalyi I (eds) Optimal experience-psychological studies on flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 319–326Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Wong M M, Csikszentmihalyi M (1991) Affiliation motivation and daily experience: some issue on gender differences. J Pers Soc Psychol 60:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Kleiber D, Larson R, Csikszentmihalyi M (1986) The experience of leisure in adolescence. J Leisure Res 18:169–176Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Bassi M, Delle Fave A (2004) Adolescents and the changing context of optimal experience in time: Italy 1986–2000. J Happiness Stud 5:155–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Larson R, Kleiber D (1993) Daily experience of adolescents. In: Tolan P, Cohler B (eds) Handbook of clinical research and practice with adolescents. Wiley, New York pp 125–145Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Dowson M, McInerney DM (2003) What do student say about their motivational goals? Toward a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation. Contemp Educ Psychol 28:91–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Larson R, Delespaul O (1992) Analysing experience sampling data: a guidebook for the perplexed. In deVries MW (ed) The experience of psychopathology: investigating mental disorders in the natural setting, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 58–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Csikszentmihalyi M, Massimini F (1985) On the psychological selection of bio-cultural information. New Ideas Psychol 3:115–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Khalil EL, Boulding KE (1996) Evolution, order, and complexity. Rutledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Changeaux JP, Chavaillon J (1995) Origins of human brain. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Nicholson N (1997) Evolutionary psychology: toward a new view of human nature and organizational society. Hum Relat 50:1050–1078Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Edelman GM (1992) Bright air, brilliant fire. On the Matter of the Mind. Basic Books, INC trad. It: Frediani S (1993) Sulla materia della mente. Adelphi, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Prigogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of chaos. Man’s new dialog with nature. Bantam Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Maturana H, Varela F (1986) The tree of knowledge: a new look at the biological roots of human understanding. New Science Library, BostonGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Delle Fave A (2007) Individual development and community empowerment: suggestions from studies on optimal experience. In Haworth J, Hart G (eds) Well-being: individual, community, and societal perspectives. London, Palgrave McMillan, pp 41–56Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Bassi
    • 1
  • Raffaela D. G. Sartori
    • 1
  • Antonella Delle Fave
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Preclinical Sciences LITA VialbaUniversity of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations