Skip to main content

Invited Commentary

  • Chapter
Pelvic Floor Disorders

Abstract

The authors of this chapter should be congratulated on a well-presented summary of complications after colorectal surgery. Their thorough overview ranges from presenting the statistics of these complications to the algorithms for their management. Without a doubt this work would have greater didactic value if it mentioned the examinations to be performed in diagnosing the presented complications. Also lacking were complications of surgery or procedures on the anal canal, such as incontinence of gas and stool, the recurrence of a fistula-in-ano or an abscess, and strictures and deformations of the anal canal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ratto C. Invited commentary. Surgical and endosonographic anatomy of the rectum. In: Santoro GA, Di Falco G (eds) Atlas of endoanal and endorectal ultrasonography. Springer-Verlag Italy, Milan, 2004, pp 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Onaca N, Hirhberg A, Adar R. Early reoperation for perirectal abscess: a preventable complication. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1469–1473.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramanujam PS, Prasad M, Abcarian H, Tan AB. Perianal abscesses and fistulas. A study of 1023 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:593–597.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lunnis DJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS. Factors affecting continence after surgery for anal fistula. Br J Surg 1984; 81: 1382–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD et al. Anal fistula surgery: factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:723–729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. dal Monte PP. Transanal hemorrhoidal dematerialisation: non-excisional surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 2007;11:37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernández-Frías AM, Pérez-Vicente F, Arroyo A et al. Is anal endosonography useful in the study of recurrent complex fistula-in-ano? Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2006;98(8):573–581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Law PJ, Talbot RW, Bartram CI, Northover JMA. Anal endosonography in the evaluation of perianal sepsis and fistula in ano. Br J Surg 1989;76:752–755.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Santoro GA, Ratto C. Accuracy and reliablity of endoanal ultrasonography in the evaluation of perianal abscesses and fistula-in-ano. In: Santoro GA, Di Falco G (eds) Benign anorectal diseases. Diagnosis with endoanal and endorectal ultrasound and new treatment options. Springer-Verlag Italy, Milan, 2006, pp 141–183.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Choen S, Nicholls RJ. Anal fistula. Br J Surg 1992; 79:197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheong DMO, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD, Jagelman DG. Anal endosonography for recurrent anal fistulas: image enhancement with hydrogen peroxide. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:1158–1160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Halligan S, Stoker J. Imaging of fistula in ano. Radiology 2006;239:18–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kruskal JB, Kane RA, Morrin MM. Peroxide-enhanced anal endosonography: technique, image interpretation, and clinical applications. Radiographic 2001;21:51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ratto C, Gentile E, Merico M et al. How can the assessment of fistula in ano be improved? Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:1375–1382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ziech M, Felt-Bersma R, Stoker J. Imaging of perianal fistulas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7(10):1037–1045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabir N, Sungurtekin U, Erdem E, Nessar M. Magnetic resonance imaging with rectal Gd-DTPA: new tool for the diagnosis of perianal fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis 2000;15(5–6): 317–322.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stoker J, Rociu E, Wiersma TG, Laméris JS. Imaging of anorectal disease. Br J Surg 2000;87(1):10–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Santoro GA, Fortling B. The advantages of volume rendering in three-dimensional endosonography of the anorectum. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;50:359–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liberman H, Thorson AG. Anal stenosis. Am J Surg 2000;179:325–329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oh C, Divino CM, Steinhagen RM. Anal fissure. 20-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:378–382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sudoł-Szopińska, I., Kołodziejczak, M. (2010). Invited Commentary. In: Santoro, G.A., Wieczorek, A.P., Bartram, C.I. (eds) Pelvic Floor Disorders. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1542-5_95

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1542-5_95

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1541-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1542-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics