Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Imaging RM della prostata pp 117–125Cite as

Ruolo della RM nella guida alla biopsia mirata con ecografia transrettale

  • Chapter

  • 607 Accesses

Riassunto

Sino a oggi lo screening del carcinoma prostatico è stato affidato all’esplorazione rettale e al dosaggio sierico del PSA in associazione all’ecografia transrettale (TRUS), mediante la quale è possibile effettuare in tempo reale il prelievo bioptico [1]; sicuramente negli ultimi anni l’utilizzo delle tre indagini ha portato a un decremento della mortalità, ma poco ha inciso sull’accuratezza dei prelievi bioptici stessi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M et al (2008) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 53:68–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pondaman KM, Fütterer JJ, ten Haken B et al (2008) MRGuided Biopsy of the prostate: An overview of Technique and a Systematic Review. Eur Urol 54(3):517–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Djavan B, Milani S, Remzi M et al (2005) Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update. Can J Urol 12 Suppl 1:44–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heenan SD (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 7(4):282–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Villers A, Puech P, Mouton D et al (2006) Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. J Urol 176(6 Pt 1):2432–2437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmed HU, Calleary J, Arya M et al (2007) Re: Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings: A. Villers, P. Puech, D. Mouton et al. J Urol 2006; 176:2432–2437. J Urol 177:2395; author reply 2395–2396

    Google Scholar 

  7. Megwalu II, Ferguson GG, Wei JT et al (2008) Evaluation of a novel precision template-guided biopsy system for detecting prostate cancer. BJU Int 102(5):546–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheikh AB, Girouin N, Colombel M et al (2009) Evaluation of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in localizing prostate cancer before repeat biopsy. Eur Radiol 19(3):770–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hambrock T, Fütterer JJ, Huisman HJ et al (2008) Thirtytwo-channel coil 3T magnetic resonance-guided biopsies of prostate tumor suspicious regions identified on multimodality 3T magnetic resonance imaging: technique and feasibility. Invest Radiol 43(10):686–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jung JA, Coakley FV, Vigneron DB et al (2004) Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system. Radiology 233: 701–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H, Moskowitz C et al (2007) Detection of prostate cancer with MR spectroscopic imaging: an expanded paradigm incorporating polyamines. Radiology 245:499–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Seitz M, Shukla-Dave A, Bjartell A et al (2009) Functional magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer. Eur Urol 55:801–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Marzo AM, Marchi VL, Epstein JI, Nelson WG (1999) Proliferative inflammatory atrophy of the prostate: implications for prostatic carcinogenesis. Am J Pathol 155(6):1985–1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mullerad M, Hricak H, Kuroiwa K et al (2005) Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer. J Urol 174(6): 2158–2163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jager GJ, Ruijter ET, van de Kaa CA et al (1997) Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results. Radiology 203:645–652

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Futterer JJ, Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW et al (2006) Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 241(2):449–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Noworolski SM, Vigneron DB, Chen AP, Kurhanewicz J (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and MR diffusion imaging to distinguish between glandular and stromal prostatic tissues. Magn Reson Imaging 26(8):1071–1080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nelson WG, De Marzo AM, Isaacs WB (2003) Prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 349(4):366–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wagenlehner FM, Elkahwaji JE, Algaba F et al (2007) The role of inflammation and infection in the pathogenesis of prostate carcinoma. BJU Int 100(4):733–737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coleman JA (2008) Editorial comment on: MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: an overview of techniques and a systematic review. Eur Urol 54(3):525–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wefer AE, Hricak H, Vigneron DB et al (2000) Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. J Urol 164(2): 400–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche “Sapienza”, Università di Roma, Roma, Italia

    Valeria Panebianco, Silvia Bernardo & Alessandro Sciarra

Authors
  1. Valeria Panebianco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Silvia Bernardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alessandro Sciarra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche “Sapienza”, Università di Roma, Roma, Italia

    Roberto Passariello  & Valeria Panebianco  & 

  2. Dipartimento di Scienze Urologiche “Sapienza”, Università di Roma, Roma, Italia

    Franco Di Silverio  & Alessandro Sciarra  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Panebianco, V., Bernardo, S., Sciarra, A. (2010). Ruolo della RM nella guida alla biopsia mirata con ecografia transrettale. In: Passariello, R., Panebianco, V., Di Silverio, F., Sciarra, A. (eds) Imaging RM della prostata. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1516-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1516-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1515-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1516-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation