Wealth Redistribution in Boltzmann-like Models of Conservative Economies
One of the goals of Boltzmann-like models for wealth distribution in conservative economies is to predict the stationary distribution of wealth in terms of the microscopic trade interactions. In a recent paper , a kinetic model for wealth distribution able to reproduce the salient features of this stationary curve by including taxation and redistribution has been introduced and discussed. This continuous model represents the natural extension of some recent researches [11, 12, 15, 18], in which discrete simplified models for the exploitation of finite resources by interacting agents, where each agent receives a random fraction of the available resources, have been considered. Here we show that a simple modification of the kinetic model introduced in  can be studied numerically to quantify the effect of various taxation regimes.
KeywordsDirect Simulation Monte Carlo Wealth Distribution Total Wealth Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulation Steady Distribution
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bisi M., Spiga G., Toscani G.: Kinetic models of conservative economies with wealth redistribution. (preprint) (2009)Google Scholar
- 5.Chatterjee A., Yarlagadda S.V., Chakrabarti B.K. Eds.: Econophysics ofWealth Distributions. New Economic Window Series, Springer-Verlag (Italy), (2005)Google Scholar
- 10.Düring B., Matthes D., Toscani G.: A Boltzmann type approach to the formation of wealth distribution curves, Riv. Mat. Univ. Parma, in press, (2009)Google Scholar
- 11.Garibaldi U., Scalas E., Viarengo P.: Statistical equilibrium in simple exchange games II. The redistribution game. Eur. Phys. Jour. B 60(2) 241–246 (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.Guala S.: Taxes in a simple wealth distribution model by inelastically scattering particles. (preprint) arXiv:0807.4484v1Google Scholar
- 13.Hayes B.: Follow the money. American Scientist 90, 400–405 (2002)Google Scholar
- 20.Solomon S., Richmond P.: Stable power laws in variable economies; Lotka-Volterra implies Pareto-Zipf. Eur. Phys. J. B 27, 257–262 (2002)Google Scholar