Variable Populations and Inequality-Sensitive Ethical Judgments

  • S. Subramanian
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)


Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai, India. Abstract This note makes the very simple point that apparently unexceptionable axioms of variable population inequality comparisons, such as the replication invariance property, can militate against other basic and intuitively plausible desiderata. This has obvious, and complicating, implications for the measurement of inequality which, for the most part, has been routinely guided by a belief in the unproblematic nature of population-neutrality principles.


Income Distribution Binary Relation Income Share Inequality Index Equivalent Income 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anand, S. (1983). Inequality and Poverty in Malaysia: Measurement and Decomposition. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkinson, A.B. (1970). On the Measurement of Inequality, Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chakravarty, S., S. R. Kanbur and D. Mukherjee. 2006. Population Growth and Poverty Measurement, Social Choice and Welfare 26(3): 471–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sen, A.K. (1973). On Economic Inequality. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shorrocks, A. F. (1988). Aggregation Issues in Inequality Measurement, In W. Eichhorn (ed.) Measurement in Economics: Theory and Applications in Economic Indices, Heidelberg: Physica-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shorrocks, A. F. (2005). Inequality Values and Unequal Shares, UNU-WIDER, Helsinki. Available at Scholar
  8. 8.
    Subramanian, S. (1995). Toward a Simple Interpretation of the Atkinson Class of Inequality Indices, MIDS Working Paper No. 133, Madras Institute of Development Studies: Chennai, (mimeo)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Subramanian, S. (2002). An Elementary Interpretation of the Gini Inequality Index, Theory and Decision, 52(4): 375–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Subramanian
    • 1
  1. 1.Madras Institute of Development StudiesChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations