Variable Populations and Inequality-Sensitive Ethical Judgments
Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai, India. Abstract This note makes the very simple point that apparently unexceptionable axioms of variable population inequality comparisons, such as the replication invariance property, can militate against other basic and intuitively plausible desiderata. This has obvious, and complicating, implications for the measurement of inequality which, for the most part, has been routinely guided by a belief in the unproblematic nature of population-neutrality principles.
KeywordsIncome Distribution Binary Relation Income Share Inequality Index Equivalent Income
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Anand, S. (1983). Inequality and Poverty in Malaysia: Measurement and Decomposition. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- 4.Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
- 6.Shorrocks, A. F. (1988). Aggregation Issues in Inequality Measurement, In W. Eichhorn (ed.) Measurement in Economics: Theory and Applications in Economic Indices, Heidelberg: Physica-VerlagGoogle Scholar
- 7.Shorrocks, A. F. (2005). Inequality Values and Unequal Shares, UNU-WIDER, Helsinki. Available at http://www.wider.unu.edu/conference/conference-2005-5/conference-2005.5.htmGoogle Scholar
- 8.Subramanian, S. (1995). Toward a Simple Interpretation of the Atkinson Class of Inequality Indices, MIDS Working Paper No. 133, Madras Institute of Development Studies: Chennai, (mimeo)Google Scholar