Advertisement

The Morphology of Urban Agglomerations for Developing Countries: A Case Study with China

  • Kausik Gangopadhyay
  • Banasri Basu
Conference paper
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)

Abstract

In this article, the relationship between two well-accepted empirical propositions regarding the distribution of population in cities, namely, Gibrat’s law and Zipf’s law, are rigorously examined using the Chinese census data. Our findings are quite in contrast with the most of the previous studies performed exclusively for developed countries. This motivates us to build a general environment to explain the morphology of urban agglomerations both in developed and developing countries. A dynamic process of job creation generates a particular distribution for the urban agglomerations and introduction of Special Economic Zones (SEZ) in this abstract environment shows that the empirical observations are in good agreement with the proposed model.

Keywords

Cumulative Distribution Function Urban Agglomeration Special Economic Zone Indian Statistical Institute Lative Distribution Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Batty and P. Longley, Fractal Cities, Academic Press, San Diego, 1994Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Benguigui, A new aggregation model. Application to town growth, Physica A 219, 1995 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. J. Newman, Power-law distributions in empirical data, arxiv:0706.1062v1Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Juan Carlos Cordoba, On the Distribution of City Sizes, Journal of Urban Economics, January 2008Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jan Eeckhout, Gibrats Law for (all) Cities, American Economic Review 94(5), 2004, 1429–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xavier Gabaix, Zipfs Law for Cities: An Explanation, Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3), August 1999, p.739–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Evolution of City Size Distributions, Xavier Gabaix and Yannis Ioannides, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4, V. Henderson and J-F. Thisse eds, 2004, North-Holland, 2341–2378Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kausik Gangopadhyay and B. Basu, City Size Distribution for India and China, Physica A (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Self-Organizing Economy, (Blackwell Publishers Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H A. Makse et al.Modeling Urban Growth Patterns with Correlated Percolation, arXiv:condmat/ 9809431v1 [cond-mat.dis-nn], Phys. Rev. E (1 December 1998); Nature 377, 608 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adrian Pagan and Aman Ullah, Nonparametric Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, 1999Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.M. Witten and L.M. Sander, Diffusion-Limited Aggregation, a Kinetic Critical Phenomenon, Phys. Rev. Lett 47 (1981) 1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H.D. Rozenfeld et. al.,Laws of population growth, arXiv:08082202Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. H. Zanette and S.C. Manrubi, Role of Intermittency in Urban Development: A Model of Large-Scale City Formation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79(1997) 523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y.B. Zeldovich et al. The Almighty Chance (World Scientific, Singapore 1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.K. Zipf, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort (Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA, 1949)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kausik Gangopadhyay
    • 1
  • Banasri Basu
    • 2
  1. 1.Economic Research UnitIndian Statistical InstituteKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Physics and Applied Mathematics UnitIndian Statistical InstituteKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations