Multi-species Models in Econo- and Sociophysics

  • Bertram Düring
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)


In econo- and sociophysical modeling of heterogeneous problems it is often natural to study the time-evolution of distribution functions of different, interacting species. Such models can be seen as the analogue to the physical problem of a mixture of gases, where the molecules of the different gases exchange momentum during collisions. We give two examples of problems where models with multiple, interacting species arise naturally. One is concerned with the formation of bimodal wealth or income distributions in a society, the other considers the process of opinion formation in a heterogeneous society which is built of two groups, one group of ordinary people and one group of so-called strong leaders.


Opinion Formation Direct Simulation Monte Carlo Collision Operator Wealth Distribution Trading Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A.V. Bobylev and I.M. Gamba, Boltzmann equations for mixtures of Maxwell gases: exact solutions and power like tails, J. Stat. Phys., 124, 497–516, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Cordier, L. Pareschi, and G. Toscani, On a kinetic model for a simple market economy, J. Stat. Phys., 120, 253–277, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Düring and G. Toscani, Hydrodynamics from kinetic models of conservative economies, Physica A, 384(2), 493–506, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Düring and G. Toscani, International and domestic trading and wealth distribution, Comm. Math. Sci. 6(4), 1043–1058, 2008Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Düring, D. Matthes, and G. Toscani, Kinetic equations modelling wealth redistribution: a comparison of approaches, Phys. Rev. E 78(5), 056103, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Düring, P.A. Markowich, J.-F. Pietschmann, and M.-T. Wolfram. Opinion formation with strong leaders, in preparation, 2009Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.C. Ferrero, The monomodal, polymodal, equilibrium and nonequilibrium distribution of money, in: Econophysics of Wealth Distributions, A. Chatterjee, S. Yarlagadda, and B.K. Chakrabarti (eds.), Springer (Italy), 2005Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Gupta, Money exchange model and a general outlook, Physica A, 359, 634–640, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Toscani. Kinetic models of opinion formation, Commun. Math. Sci. 4(3) 481–496, 2006Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Wang, N. Ding, and L. Zhang, The circulation of money and holding time distribution, Physica A, 324(3–4), 665–677, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bertram Düring
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Analysis und Scientific ComputingTechnische UniversitätWienWienAustria

Personalised recommendations