Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper presents a discrete mixture model as a suitable approach for the analysis of data concerning risk perception, when they are expressed by means of ordered scores (ratings). The model, which is the result of a personal feeling (risk perception) towards the object and an inherent uncertainty in the choice of the ordinal value of responses, reduces the collective information, synthesising different risk dimensions related to a preselected domain. After a brief introduction to risk management, the presentation of the CUB model and related inferential issues, we illustrate a case study concerning risk perception for the workers of a printing press factory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balirano, G., Corduas, M.: Detecting semiotically expressed humor in diasporic tv productions. Humor: Int. J. Humor Res. 3, 227–251 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonafede, E.C., Cerchiello, P., Giudici, P.: A proposal for the fuzzification of causal variables, in operational risk management. Quaderni di Dipartimento di Statistica 44 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonafede, E.C., Cerchiello, P., Giudici, P.: Statistical models for Business Continuity Management. J. Oper. Risk Man. 2, 79–96 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonafede, E.C., Giudici, P.: Bayesian networks for enterprise risk assessment. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 382, 22–28 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bromiley, P., Curley, S.P.: Individual differences in risk taking. In: Yates, F. (ed.) Risk-Taking Behavior. pp. 87–132. Wiley, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corduas, M.: A study on university students’ opinions about teaching quality: a model based approach for clustering data. In Proceedings of DIVAGO Meeting, University of Palermo (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. D’Elia, A.: A statistical modelling approach for the analysis of TMD chronic pain data. Stat. Meth. Med. Res. 17, 389–403 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Elia, A., Piccolo, D.: A mixture model for preference data analysis. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 49, 917–934 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Godo, L., Torra, V.: On aggregation operators for ordinal qualitative information. Fuzzy Syst. 8, 143–154 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iannario, M.: A statistical approach for modelling Urban Audit Perception Surveys. Quad. Stat. 9, 149–172 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Iannario, M.: A class of models for ordinal variables with covariates effects. Quad. Stat. 10, 53–72 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iannario, M.: Dummy variables in CUB models. Statistica 2 (2008) in press

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iannario, M., Piccolo, D.: A new statistical model for the analysis of customer satisfaction. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management (2009) in press

    Google Scholar 

  14. King, G., Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J.: Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 44, 341–355 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Loewenstein, F., Hsee, C.K., Weber, U., Welch, N., Risk as feelings. Psychol. Bull. 127, 267–286 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McLachlan, G., Krishnan, G.J.: The EM Algorithm and Extensions. Wiley, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. McLachlan, G., Peel, G.J.: Finite Mixture Models. Wiley, New York (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Piccolo, D.: Observed information matrix for MUB models. Quad. Stat. 8, 33–78 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Piccolo, D., D’Elia, A.: A new approach for modelling consumers’ preferences. Food Qual. Pref. 19, 247–259 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rundmo T.: Risk perception and safety on offshore petroleum platforms Part 1: perception of risk. Saf. Sci. 15, 39–52 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rundmo, T.: Associations between risk perception and safety. Saf. Sci. 24, 197–209 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Slimak, M.W., Dietz, T.: Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Anal. 26, 1689–1705 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weber, E.U.: Personality and risk taking. In: Smelser, N.J., Baltes, P.B. (eds.): International Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Limited 11274–11276 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weber, E.U., Millman, R.: Perceived risk attitudes: relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Science 43, 122–143 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu D., Park, W.S.: Combination and evaluation of expert opinions characterized in terms of fuzzy probabilities. Ann. Nuclear Energ. 27, 713–726 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cerchiello, P., Iannario, M., Piccolo, D. (2010). Assessing risk perception by means of ordinal models. In: Corazza, M., Pizzi, C. (eds) Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1481-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics