Ethics of Decision Making in Critical Care
This review will define the context of medical practice in the 21st century to highlight the challenge of managing patients with severe illness and at extremes of age where this was previously not possible. Equally, by virtue of the illness, these patients are often incapable of providing truly informed consent. For this reason there is a greater responsibility for the clinician to be the patient’s advocate. Patient autonomy is always the first imperative for the clinician but the need to be aware of and responsive to the other ethical tenets will be addressed.
KeywordsSevere Sepsis Patient Autonomy Survive Sepsis Campaign Survive Sepsis Campaign Guideline Withdraw Life Support
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 12.Amaral AC, Rubenfeld GD (2009) The future of critical care. Curr Opin Crit Care. Jun 9. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 19.Richards GA, Bhagwanjee S et al (2003) Severe sepsis and the role of novel therapeutic agents: Position statement of the Critical Care Society of Southern Africa. SAMJ 93:416–419Google Scholar
- 25.Halperin H, Paradis N, Mosesso V Jr et al (2007) Recommendations for implementation of community consultation and public disclosure under the Food and Drug Administration’s “Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research”: A special report from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative and Critical Care: Endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation 116:1855–1863. Epub 2007 Sep 24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Bhagwanjee S, Muckart DJJ, Hodgson RE (1997) Organ failure scoring does not predict mortality in critically ill trauma patients. SAMJ 87:1584–1586Google Scholar