Advertisement

Neonatology pp 192-196 | Cite as

Neonatology and the Law

  • Vittorio Fineschi
  • Emanuela Turillazzi

Abstract

Neonatology is an area of medicine that has received much attention in recent years. This interest primarily concerns the constant progress in this field and the inherent ethical and medico legal problems. The extensive debate about some issues reflects both the technical and scientific progress that has been made in neonatology. Tightly argued issues such as medical malpractice litigation have reached crisis proportions in the neonatology and pediatrics. Moreover pediatric claims are very expensive because damages cover the life of the child and the juries tend to be very sympathetic toward children and their families [1]. Care of extremely preterm infants at the limits of viability and the “brain damaged newborn” are some of the more contentious areas of legal medicine in neonatology.

Keywords

Cerebral Palsy Medical Malpractice Periventricular Leukomalacia Malpractice Claim Harvard Medical Practice Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Donn SM (2005) Medical liability, risk management, and the quality of health care. Sem Fetal Neonatal Med 10:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Donn SM, Chiswick ML, Whittell P, Anderson S (2003) Medico-legal implications of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. In: Donn SM, Sinha SK, Chiswick ML (eds) Birth asphyxia and the brain: basic science and clinical implications. Futura Publishing, Armonk, NY, pp 379–401Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cowan PJ (2005) Litigation. Sem Fetal Neonatal Med 10:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiswick M (2008) Infants of borderline viability: ethical and clinical considerations. Sem Fetal Neonatal Med 13:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pinter AB (2008) End-of-life decision before and after birth: changing ethical considerations. J Pediatr Surg 43:430–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sklansky M (2001) Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability. J Med Ethics 27:5–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pignotti MS, Donzelli G (2008) Perinatal care at the threshold of viability: an international comparison of practical guidelines for the treatment of extremely preterm births. Pediatrics 121:e193–e198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sladkevicius P, Saltvedt S, Almström H et al (2005) Ultrasound dating at 12–14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:504–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Janvier A, Barrington KJ, Aziz K, Lantos J (2008) Ethics ain’t easy: do we need simple rules for complicated ethical decisions? Acta Paediatr 97:402–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doyle LW, Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group (2001) Outcome at 5 years of age of children 23 to 27 weeks’ gestation: refining the prognosis. Paediatrics 108:134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Levene MI (2007) An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive approach to peri-viability: gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal and neonatal dimensions. J Obstet Gynaecol 27:3–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allen MC (2008) Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants. Curr Opin Neurol 21:123–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    April C, Parker M (2007) End of life decision-making in neonatal care. J Med Ethics 33:126–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Savulescu J, Kahane G (2009) The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life. Bioethics 23:274–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Janvier A, Leblanc I, Barrington KJ (2008) The best-interest standard is not applied for neonatal resuscitation decisions. Pediatrics 121:963–969PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Janvier A, Bauer KL, Lantos JD (2007) Are newborns morally different from older children? Theor Med Bioethics 28:413–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turillazzi E, Fineschi V (2009) How old are you? Newborn gestational age discriminates neonatal resuscitation practices in the Italian debate. BMC Med Ethics 12:10–19Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fanaroff AA (2008) Extremely low birthweight infants-the interplay between outcomes and ethics. Acta Paediatr 97:144–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    MacLennan A (1999) A template for defining a causal relation between acute intrapartum events and cerebral palsy: international consensus statement. BMJ 319:1054–1059PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Graham EM, Ruis KA, Hartman AL et al (2008) A systematic review of the role of intrapartum hypoxia-ischemia in the causation of neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:587–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Greenwood C, Newman S, Impey L et al (2003) Cerebral palsy and clinical negligence litigation: a cohort study. BJOG 110:6–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Freeman RK (2008) Medical and legal implications for necessary requirements to diagnose damaging hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy leading to later cerebral palsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:585–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paneth N (2001) Cerebral palsy in term infants-birth or before birth? J Pediatr 138:791–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blair E, Stanley FJ (1997) Issues in the classification and epidemiology of cerebral palsy. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 3:184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nielsen LF, Schendel D, Grove J et al (2008) Asphyxia-related risk factors and their timing in spastic cerebral palsy. BJOG 115:1518–1528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Folkerth RD (2007) The neuropathology of acquired pre-and perinatal brain injuries. Semin Diagn Pathol 24:48–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Squier W (2002) Pathology of fetal and neonatal brain damage: identifying the timing. In: Squier W (ed) Aquired damage to the developing brain, Timing and causation. Arnold, London, pp 110–127Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Squier W, Cowan FM (2004) The value of autopsy in determining the cause of failure to respond to resuscitation at birth. Sem Neonatol 9:331–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kadhim H, Evrard P, Kahn A et al (2005) Insights into etiopathogenic mechanisms involved in perinatal cerebral injury: implications for neuroprotection. In: Fong HD (ed) Focus on cerebral palsy research. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Riezzo I, Neri M, De Stefano F et al (2010) The timing of perinatal hypoxia/ischemia events in term neonates: a retrospective autopsy study. HSPs, ORP-150 and COX2 are reliable markers to classify acute, perinatal events. Diagn Pathol 5:49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McAbee GN, Donn SM, Mendelson RA et al (2008) Medical diagnoses commonly associated with pediatric malpractice lawsuits in the United States. Pediatrics 122:e1282–e1286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Carroll AE, Buddenbaum JL (2007) Malpractice claims involving pediatricians: epidemiology and etiology. Pediatrics 120:10–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Harvard Medical Practice Study (1990) Patients, doctors, and lawyers: medical injury, malpractice litigation, and patient compensation in New York: a report by the Harvard Medical Practice Study to the State of New York. Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA (2006) What pediatricians should know about child-related malpractice payments in the United States. Pediatrics 118:464–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Turbow R, Fanaroff JM (2006) Legal issues in neonatal-perinatal medicine. In: Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA, Walsh WC (eds) Fanaroff and Martin’s Neonatal-perinatal medicine, 8th edn. Mosby, Philadelphia, vol. 1, pp 47–62Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vittorio Fineschi
    • 1
  • Emanuela Turillazzi
  1. 1.Department of Legal MedicineUniversity of FoggiaFoggiaItaly

Personalised recommendations