Neonatology pp 117-121 | Cite as

The Process of Decision-Making

  • Endla K. Anday
  • Maria Delivoria-Papadopoulos


In the past 40 years, tremendous progress has occurred in the care of the neonatal patient. An in-depth understanding of fetal and neonatal physiology and the molecular basis of pathological processes, concurrent with advancements in biomedical technology, have impacted favorably upon the survival of the newborn. However, extremely premature infants at the threshold of viability, infants diagnosed with potentially lethal congenital malformations, including chromosomal abnormalities, and neonates suffering from profound intrapartum and postnatal insults present difficult moral, ethical, cultural and social challenges for both families and caregivers in regard to providing or withholding life supportive measures. The decision to withhold or terminate treatment for an infant is based on defining the issues central to this process, including: the values and rights of the infant as an individual, the values of the family and the medical caregivers and the cultural influences and societal values that shape the moral arguments that affect one’s judgment. Part of the challenge resides in the complexity of defining who is or should be responsible for making difficult decisions resulting in the death of a newborn since fundamentally this type of decision is at odds with human nature even in situations where the end of life would mean no further suffering for the infant.


Premature Infant Neonatal Resuscitation Medical Care Provider Neonatal Resuscitation Program Groningen Protocol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Viner J (1925) The utility concept in value theory and its critics. J Pol Econ 33:369–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gazzaniga RB, Ivry RB, Mangun GR (2002) Cognitive Neuroscience, 2nd edn. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR (2000) Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 10:295–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casebeer WD (2003) Moral cognition and its neural constituents. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:840–846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:167–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Casebeer WD (2003) Natural ethical facts: Evolution, connectionism, and moral cognition. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greene JD, Sommerville RB, Nystrom LE et al (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293:2105–2108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Damasio A (2007) Neuroscience and Ethics: Intersections. Am J Bioeth 7:3–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boss RD, Hutton N, Sulpar LJ et al (2008) Values parents apply to decision-making regarding delivery room resuscitation for high-risk newborn. Pediatrics 122:583–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics (1994) Guidelines on forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment. Pediatrics 93:532–536Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (2002) Public Law 107–207 107th Congress. An Act To protect infants who are born aliveGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boyle D, Carlo WA, Goldsmith J et al (2003) Born-Alive Infant Protection Act of 2001 Public Law No 107–207. Pediatrics 111:680–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baby Doe Law (1984) U.S. Code, Title 42 The public health and welfare, Chapter 67 Child abuse prevention and treatment and adoption reform § 5106a Grants to States for child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment programsGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Janvier A, Leblanc MD, Barrington KJ (2008) The best-interest standard is not applied for neonatal resuscitation decisions. Pediatrics 121:963–969PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leuthner S (2001) Decisions regarding resuscitation of the extremely premature infant and models of best interest. J Perinatol 21:193–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haward MF, Murphy RO, Lorenz JM (2008) Message framing and perinatal decisions. Pediatrics 122:109–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paris JJ, Graham N, Schreiber MD, Goodwin M (2006) Approaches to end-of-life decision-making in the NICU: Insights from Dostoevsky’s The Grand Inquisitor. J Perinatol 26:389–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) (2007) Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 6th ednGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bell EF (2007) Noninitiation or withdrawal of intensive care for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics 119:401–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Watchko JF (1986) The tragic vision: Acknowledging limits and uncertainty. J Perinatol 6:39–43Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pignotti MS, Donzelli G (2008) Perinatal care at the threshold of viability: An international comparison of practical guidelines for the treatment of extremely preterm births. Pediatrics 121:e193–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (2006) The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: neonatal resuscitation. Pediatrics 117:978–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Verhagen AA, Sauer PJ (2005) End-of-life decisions in newborns: An approach from the Netherlands. Pediatrics 116:736–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rebagliato M, Cuttini M, Broggin L et al (2000) Neonatal end-of-life decision making: physicians’ attitudes and relationship with self-reported practices in 10 European countries. JAMA 284:2451–2459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lorenz JM (2005) Prenatal counseling and resuscitation decisions at extremely premature gestation. J Pediatr 147:567–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Curlin FA, Lawrence RE, Chin MH, Lantos JD (2007) Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices. N Engl J Med 356:593–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Williams C, Cairnie J, Fines V et al (2009) Construction of a parent-derived questionnaire to measure end-of-life care after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 123:e87–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hippocrates: the art (1977). In: Reiser SJ, Dyck AJ, Curran WJ (eds). Ethics in medicine: historical perspectives and contemporary concerns. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1977:6–7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Endla K. Anday
    • 1
  • Maria Delivoria-Papadopoulos
  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics, Drexel University College of MedicineSt. Christopher’s Hospital for ChildrenPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations