Skip to main content
  • 1147 Accesses

Abstract

There have been major changes in the imaging of trauma in the last few years, primarily secondary to advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the ab]Introduction of fast multislice CT. The use of cross-sectional imaging, however, is limited by availability, cost, and radiation exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berbaum, KS, El-Khoury GY, Franken EA et al (1988) Impact of clinical history on fracture detection with radiography. Radiology 168:507–511

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Neer C (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 52-A(6): 1077–1089

    Google Scholar 

  3. Siebenrock KA, Gerber C, Switzerland B (1993) The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg 75-A(12): 1751–1754

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bernstein J, Adler LM, Blank JE et al (1996) Evaluation of the neer system of classification of proximal humeral fractures with computerized tomographic scans and plain radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg 78-A(9): 1371–1375

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sjoden GO, Movin T, Aspelin P et al (1999) 3D-radiographic analysis does not improve the Neer and AO classifications of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 70(4):325–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Castagno AA, Shuman WP, Kilcoyne RF et al (1987) Complex fractures of the proximal humerus: role of CT in treatment. Radiology 165:759–762

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McAdams TR, Blevins FT, Martin TP, DeCoster TA (2002) The role of plain films and computer tomography in the evaluation of scapular neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma 16(1):7–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Markham DE, Rowland J (1969) The shoulder joint — is it dislocated? Apparent dislocation of the shoulder joint. Clin Radiol 20:61–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keats TE, Pope TI (1988) The acromioclavicular joint: normal variation and the diagnosis of dislocation. Skel Radiol 17:159–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapman V, Grottkau B, Albright M et al (2006) MDCT of the elbow in pediatric patients with posttraumatic elbow effusions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:812–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Major NM, Crawford ST (2002) Elbow effusions in trauma in adults and children: Is there an occult fracture? AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:413–418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffith JF, Roebuck DJ, Cheng JCY et al (2001) Acute elbow trauma in children: Spectrum of injury revealed by MR Imaging not apparent on radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:53–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilula LA (1979) Carpal injuries: analytic approach and case exercises. AJR Am J Roentgenol 133:503–517

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson RP (1980) The acutely injured wrist and its residuals. Clin Orthop Rel Res 149:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaewlai R, Avery LL, Asruni AV et al (2008) Multidetector CT of carpal injuries: anatomy, fractures, and fracture-dislocations. Radiographics 28:1771–1784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Groves AM, Cheow H, Balan K et al (2005) 16-MDCT in the detection of occult wrist fractures: a comparison with skeletal scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1470–1474

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brydie A, Raby N (2003) Early MRI in the management of clinical scaphoid fracture. Br J Radiol 76:296–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dorsay TA, Major NM, Helms CA (2001) Cost-effectiveness of immediate MR imaging versus traditional follow-up for revealing radiographically occult scaphoid fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1257–1263

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Street JM (1993) Radiographs of phalangeal fractures: importance of the internally rotated oblique projection for diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:575–576

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nance EP, Kaye JJ, Milek MA (1979) Volar plate fractures. Radiology 113:61–64

    Google Scholar 

  21. O’Callaghan BI, Kohut G, Hoogewoud HM (1994) Game-keeper thumb: identification of the Stener lesion with US. Radiology 192:477–480

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisher MR, Rogers LF, Hendrix RW (1983) Systematic approach to identifying fourth and fifth carpometacarpal joint dislocations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 140:319–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bogost GA, Lizerbram EK, Crues JV III (1995) MR Imaging in evaluation of suspected hip fracture: Frequency of unsuspected bone and soft-tissue injury. Radiology 1097:263–267

    Google Scholar 

  24. Omar IM, Zoga AC, Kavanagh EC et al (2008) Athletic pubalgia and “sports hernia”: optimal MR imaging technique and findings. Radiographics 28:1415–1438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gottsegen CJ, Eyer BA, White EA et al (2008) Avulsion fractures of the knee: imaging findings and clinical significance. Radiographics 28:1755–1770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dalinka, M.K. (2009). Imaging of Skeletal Trauma. In: Hodler, J., Zollikofer, C.L., Von Schulthess, G.K. (eds) Musculoskeletal Diseases 2009–2012. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1378-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1378-0_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1377-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1378-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics