Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Osteoporosi e malattie metaboliche dell’osso pp 385–399Cite as

Software applicativi standard della DXA

  • Chapter

  • 811 Accesses

Riassunto

La densitä minerale ossea (BMD) può essere misurata nello scheletro totale, centralmente a livello lombare o del femore prossimale, oppure in distretti periferici dello scheletro appendicolare (es.: polso).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Rand T, Seidi G, Kainberger F et al (1997) Impact of spinal degenerative changes on evaluation of bone mineral density with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Calcif Tissue Int 60:430–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu G, Peacock M, Eliam O et al (1997) Effect of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine and hip on bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int. 7:564–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cherney DD, Laymon MS, McNitti A et al (2002) A study on influence of calcified intervertebral disk and aorta in determining bone mineral density. J Clin Densitom 5:193–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Girardi FP, Parvataneni HK, Sandhu HS et al (2001) Correlation between vertebral body rotation and two dimensional vertebral bone density measurament. Osteoporos Int 12:738–740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalender WA, Brestowsky H, Felsenberg D (1988) Bone mineral measurements: automated determination of midvertebral CT section. Radiology 168:219–221

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalidis L, Felsenberg D, Kalender W et al (1992) Morphometric analysis of digitized radiographs: description of automatic evaluation. In: Ring EF (ed) Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurements, vol II. British Institute of Radiology, London, pp 14–16

    Google Scholar 

  7. Steiger P, Cummings SR, Genant HK et al (1994) Morphometric x-ray absorptiometry of the spine: correlation in vivo with morphometric radiography. Osteoporos Int 4:238–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crabtree N, Wright J, Walgrove A et al (2000) Vertebral morphometry: repeat scan precision using the Lunar Expert XL and Hologic 4500A. A study for the “WISDOM” RCT of hormone replacement theraphy. Osteoporos Int 11:537–543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rao AK, Reddy S, Rao DS (2000) Is there a difference between right and left femoral bone density? J Clin Densitom 3:57–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Preidler KW, White LS, Tashkin J et al (1997) Dual X-ray absorptiometry densitometry in osteoarthritis of the hip. Influence of secondary bone remodelling of the femoral neck. Acta Radiol 38: 539–542

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goh JC, Low SL, Bose K (1995) Effect of femoral rotation on bone mineral density measurements with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 57: 340–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D et al (1993) Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 8:1211–1217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Faulkner KG, McClung M, Cummings SR (1994) Automated evaluation of hip axis lenght for predicting hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 9:1065–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Pocock NA et al (1998) Femoral neck axial lenght, height loss and risk of hip fracture in males and females. Osteoporos Int 8:75–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cummings SR, Cauley JA, Palermo L et al (1994) Racial differences in hip axis lengths might explain racial differences in rates of hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 4: 226–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Partanen J, Jamsa T, Jalovaara P (2001) Influence of upper femur and pelvic geometry on the risk and type of hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 16:1540–1546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomez Alonso C, Diaz Curiel M, Hawkins Carranza F et al (2000) Femoral bone mineral density, neck shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 11:714–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bergot C, Bousson V, Meunier A et al (2002) Hip fracture risk and proximal femur geometry from DXA scans. Osteoporos Int 8:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  19. Crabtree NJ, Kroger H, Martina et al (2002) Improving risk assessment: hip geometry, bone mineral distribution and bone strength in hip fracture and controls. The EPOS Study. Osteoporos Int 13: 48–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoshikawa T, Turner CH, Peacock M et al (1994) Geometric structure of the femoral neck measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 9:1063–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kannus P, Haapsalo H, Sievanen P et al (1994) The sitespecific effect of long term unilateral activity on bone mineral density and content. Bone 15:279–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Akessos K, Gardsell P, Serbo I et al (1992) Earlier wrist fracture: a confounding factor in distal forearm bone screening. Osteoporos Int 2:201–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Berntsen GR, Tollan A, Magnus JK et al (1999) The Tromsø study: artefacts in forearm densitometry — prevalence and effects. Osteoporos Int 10:425–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro Diagnosi e Cura dell’Osteoporosi e delle Malattie Muscolo-Scheletriche, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma

    Carlina V. Albanese

Authors
  1. Carlina V. Albanese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Albanese, C.V. (2009). Software applicativi standard della DXA. In: Osteoporosi e malattie metaboliche dell’osso. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1357-5_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1357-5_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1356-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1357-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation