Skip to main content

Riassunto

Sono noti due tipi di sorgenti di radiazione utilizzate per la densitometria con fotoni di due energie: le sorgenti a radioisotopo e le sorgenti a raggi X.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Letture consigliate

Sorgenti radiogene utilizzate

  • Blake GM, Fogelman I (1997) Technical principles of dual energy xray absorptiometry. Semin Nucl Med 27(3):210–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake GM, Parker JC, Buxton FM, Fogelman I (1993) Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans. Br J Radiol 66(790):902–906

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boudousq V, Kotzki PO, Dinten JM et al (2003) Total dose incurred by patients and staff from BMD measurement using a new 2D digital bone densitometer. Osteoporos Int 14(3):263–269

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henzell S, Dhaliwal SS, Price RI et al (2003) Comparison of pencil beam and fan beam DXA systems. J Clin Densitom 6(3):205–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koo WW, Hammami M, Hockman EM (2003) Interchangeability of pencil beam and fan beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in piglets and infants. Am J Clin Nutr 78(2):236–240

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Litaker MS, Barbeau P, Humphries MC, Gutin B (2003) Comparison of Hologic QDR-1000/W and 4500W DXA Scanners in 13-to 18-Year Olds. Obes Res 11(12):1545–1552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lunt M, Felsenberg D, Adams J et al (1997) Population-based geographic variations in DXA bone density in Europe: the EVOS Study. European Vertebral Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7(3): 175–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Njeh CF, Fuerst T, Hans D et al (1999) Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment. Appl Radiat Isot 50(1):215–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tylavsky FA, Lohman TG, Dockrell M et al (2003) Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers with that of total body water and computed tomography in assessing changes in body composition during weight change. Am J Clin Nutr 77(2):356–363

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young JT, Carter K, Marion MS, Greendale GA (2000) A simple method of computing hip axis length using fan-beam densitometry and anthropometric measurements. J Clin Densitom 3(4):325–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Valori di riferimento e confronti tra attrezzature

  • (1987) Commission of the European Communities COMAC-BME report following a workshop on ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of cerebro-vascular disease. Rome, December 1987. Clin Phys Physiol Meas Feb 10(Suppl A):1–57

    Google Scholar 

  • (1987) Commission of the European Communities COMAC-BME Workshop on Electrical Impedance Tomography-Applied Potential Tomography. 2–4 July 1986, Sheffield, UK. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 8(Suppl A): 1–184

    Google Scholar 

  • (1988) Commission of the European Communities COMAC-BME 2nd Workshop on Electrical Impedance Tomography-Applied Potential Tomography. 21–23 October 1987, Lyon, France. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 9(Suppl A): 1–147

    Google Scholar 

  • (1989) Commission of the European Communities COMAC-BME Workshop on Fetal Electro-and Phonocardiography. Ischia, Italy, 15–18 September 1988. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 10(Suppl B):1–78

    Google Scholar 

  • (1992) Ultrasound hyperthermia. Summary proceedings of a Comite Action Concernante Biomedical Engineering (CO-MAC-BME) Workshop, 12–14 September 1991, Strasbourg, France. Ultrasonics 30(2): 113–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Benmalek A, Sabatier JP (1998) Comparison and cross-calibration of DXA systems: ODX-240 and Sophos L-XRA versus Hologic QDR-4500, for spinal bone mineral measurement. Translation of a reference database. Osteoporos Int 8(6):570–577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canese R, Podo F (1991) Localized nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vivo. Physical principles and quantitative problems[CEl]. Ann 1st Sup Sanità 27(4):675–708

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conway J, Hawley M, Mangnall Y et al (1992) Experimental assessment of electrical impedance imaging for hyperthermia monitoring. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 13(Suppl A):185–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen O, de Certaines JD, Spisni A et al (1993) In vivo field dependence of proton relaxation times in human brain, liver and skeletal muscle: a multicenter study. Magn Reson Imaging 11(6):851–856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howe FA, Canese R, Podo F et al (1995) Quality assessment in in vivo NMR spectroscopy: V. Multicentre evaluation of prototype test objects and protocols for performance assessment in small bore MRS equipment. Magn Reson Imaging 13(1):159–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle SM (1986) Initiative on medical decision-making of the Biomedical Engineering Group (COMAC-BME) of the European Community. J Med Eng Technol 10(4): 199–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerski RA, de Certaines JD (1993) Performance assessment and quality control in MRI by Eurospin test objects and protocols. Magn Reson Imaging 11(6):817–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moser E, Orr JS, Podo F et al (1993) Analysis of the first international data bank on in vitro NMR relaxation times: animal liver. Magn Reson Imaging 11(6):865–872

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podo F, Bovee WM, de Certaines J et al (1995) Quality assessment in in vivo NMR spectroscopy: I. Introduction, objectives, and activities. Magn Reson Imaging 13(1):117–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podo F, Orr JS, Bovee WM et al (1993) Tissue characterization by magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging: results of a concerted research project of the European Economic Community. Introduction, objectives, and activities. Magn Reson Imaging 11(6):809–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ring PB, Jensen JA, Henriksen O (1993) A software program for exchanging MR data. Magn Reson Imaging 11(6):857–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider P, Butz S, Allolio B et al (1995) Multicenter German reference data base for peripheral quantitative computer tomography. Technol Health Care 3(2):69–73

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons A, Simpson DE, O’Doherty MJ et al (1997) The effects of standardization and reference values on patient classification for spine and femur dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 7(3):200–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cross-calibrazioni e controlli di qualità

  • Blake GM (1996) Replacing DXA scanners: cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleading. Calcif Tissue Int 59(1):1–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braillon PM (2002) Quantitative computed tomography precision and accuracy for long-term follow-up of bone mineral density measurements: a five year in vitro assessment. J Clin Densitom 5(3):259–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dequeker J, Pearson J, Reeve J et al (1995) Dual X-ray absorptiometry-cross-calibration and normative reference ranges for the spine: results of a European Community Concerted Action. Bone 17(3):247–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Genant HK, Grampp S, Gluer CC et al (1994) Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 9(10):1503–1514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalender WA, Felsenberg D, Genant HK et al (1995) The European Spine Phantom — a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. Eur J Radiol 20(2):83–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolta S, Ravaud P, Fechtenbaum J et al (1999) Accuracy and precision of 62 bone densitometers using a European Spine Phantom. Osteoporos Int 10(1):14–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lees B, Garland SW, Walton C, Stevenson JC (1997) Evaluation of the European Spine Phantom in a multi-centre clinical trial. Osteoporos Int 7(6):570–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson D, Cawte SA, Green DJ (2002) A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA. Osteoporos Int 13(12):948–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve J, Kroger H, Nijs J et al (1996) Radial cortical and trabecular bone densities of men and women standardized with the European Forearm Phantom. Calcif Tissue Int 58(3):135–143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruetsche AG, Lippuner K, Jaeger P, Casez JP (2000) Differences between dual X-ray absorptiometry using pencil beam and fan beam modes and their determinants in vivo and in vitro. J Clin Densitom 3(2):157–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Analisi della composizione corporea

  • Ara I, Vicente-Rodríguez G, Jimenez-Ramirez J et al (2004) Regular participation in sports is associated with enhanced physical fitness and lower fat mass in prepubertal boys. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28(12):1585–1593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ball SD, Altena TS (2004) Comparison of the Bod Pod and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in men. Physiol Meas 25(3):671–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ball SD, Altena TS, Swan PD (2004) Comparison of anthropometry to DXA: a new prediction equation for men. Eur J Clin Nutr 58(11):1525–1531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Monaco M, Vallero F, Di Monaco R, Mautino F, Cavanna A 0 Body composition and hip fracture type in elderly women. Clin Rheumatol. 2004 Feb 23(1):6–10. Epub 2003 Oct 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Elberg J, McDuffie JR, Sebring NG et al (2004) Comparison of methods to assess change in children’s body composition. Am J Clin Nutr 80(1):64–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frajese GV, Taylor NF, Jenkins PJ et al (2004) Modulation of cortisol metabolism during treatment of acromegaly is independent of body composition and insulin sensitivity. Horm Res 61(5):246–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman SG, Marn CS, Supiano MA, Dengel DR (2004) Validity and reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of abdominal adiposity. J Appl Physiol 97(2):509–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammami M, Koo WW, Hockman EM (2004) Technical considerations for fan-beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in pediatric studies. JPEN J Parenter Enterai Nutr 28(5):328–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontogianni MD, Dafni UG, Routsias JG, Skopouli FN (2004) Blood leptin and adiponectin as possible mediators of the relation between fat mass and BMD in perimenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 19(4):546–551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koo WW, Hammami M, Hockman EM (2004) Validation of bone mass and body composition measurements in small subjects with pencil beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Am Coll Nutr 23(1):79–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzer S, Boirie Y, Montaurier C et al (2004) A weight reduction program preserves fat-free mass but not metabolic rate in obese adolescents. Obes Res 12(2):233–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leppik A, Jurimae T, Jurimae J (2004) Influence of anthropometric parameters on the body composition measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis or DXA in children. Acta Paediatr 93(8): 1036–1041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norcross J, Van Loan MD (2004) Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18–45 years. Br J Sports Med 38(4):472–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okura T, Nakata Y, Yamabuki K, Tanaka K (2004) Regional body composition changes exhibit opposing effects on coronary heart disease risk factors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24(5):923–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sopher AB, Thornton JC, Wang J et al (2004) Measurement of percentage of body fat in 411 children and adolescents: a comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with a four-compartment model. Pediatrics 113(5): 1285–1290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soriano JM, Ioannidou E, Wang J et al (2004) Pencil beam vs fan beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: body composition and bone mineral. J Clin Densitom 7(3):281–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swennen Q, Janssens GP, Geers R et al (2004) Validation of dualenergy x-ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of chickens. Poult Sci 83(8):1348–1357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tothill P, James Hannan W (2004) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of fat and lean masses in subjects with eating disorders. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28(7):912–919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Langendonck L, Claessens AL, Lysens R et al (2004) Association between bone, body composition and strength in premenarcheal girls and postmenopausal women. Ann Hum Biol 31(2):228–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Marken Lichtenbelt WD, Hartgens F, Vollaard NB et al (2004) Body composition changes in bodybuilders: a method comparison. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36(3):490–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Marken Lichtenbelt WD, Hartgens F, Vollaard NB et al (2004) Bodybuilders’ body composition: effect of nandrolone decanoate. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36(3):484–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bagni, B., Corazzari, T., Pansini, F. (2009). Misurazione della densità minerale ossea. In: Osteoporosi e malattie metaboliche dell’osso. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1357-5_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1357-5_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1356-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1357-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics