Skip to main content

Ritorno alla terra

  • Chapter
I lettori di ossa

Part of the book series: I blu ((BLU))

  • 295 Accesses

Riassunto

Nel novembre del 2006, il consiglio di amministrazione del Britain’s Naturai History Museum di Londra si riunì per discutere il destino di alcuni scheletri aborigeni che stavano per essere sottratti per sempre alla ricerca scientifica. Il museo doveva, infatti, consegnare i resti di 17 individui al Tasmanian Aborigenal Centre, che intendeva cremarli. Prima della consegna il consiglio acconsentì a ulteriori analisi sui reperti, una scelta che irritò il centro tasmaniano e provocò un ricorso presso la Corte Suprema britannica.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Riferimento

  • Budinich M., Montagnari E., Tuniz C. (2009) International Workshop on Science for Cultural Heritage Proceedings (Trieste, October 23–27, 2006), World Scientific, Hong Kong (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke H., Smith C., Lippert D. et al (Eds) (2008) Kennewick Man Perspectives on the Ancient One, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Busatta S. (2006) “La guerra delle ossa: la controversia sull’Uomo di Kennewick”, Antrocom, vol. 2, n. 1, pp. 37–43 (http://www.antrocom.net/upload/sub/antrocom/020106/08-Antrocom.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers N. (2003) “Statement of dissent from Neil Chalmers” in: Report of the Working Group on Human Remains (www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/ghrjreportfeb07.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillios M., Field J., Charles B. (2009) “Investigating human and megafauna co-occurrence in Australian prehistory: Mode and causality in fossil accumulations at Cuddie Springs”, Quaternary International, doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2009.04.003 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones C (2002) “Bones of contention”, The Bulletin, April 9, 2002, pp. 37–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones C. (2003) “Home is where the oxygen isotope is”, Australian Financial Review, Nov. 1–2, 2003, p. 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt N. (2001) “Kennewick Man: Burying the truth about America’s past”, Spiked-Science, January 20, 2001 (www.spiked-online.com/Articles/0000000053AD.htm)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcmanamon F.P. (2004) “Kennewick Man”, National Park Service Archeology Program (www.nps.gov/archeology/Kennewick/)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvaney D.J. (1991) “Past regained, future lost: The Kow Swamp Pleistocene burials”, Antiquity, vol. 65, pp. 12–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Prideaux G.J., Ayliffe L.K., Desantis L.R.G. et al. (2009) “Extinction implications of a chenopod browse diet for a giant Pleistocene kangaroo”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 106, pp. 11646–11650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith L. (2004) “The repatriation of human remains—problem or opportunity”, Antiquity, vol. 78, pp. 404–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Tafforeau P., Smith T.M. (2008) “Nondestructive imaging of hominoid dental microstructure using phase contrast X-ray synchrotron microtomography”, Journal of Human Evolution, vol. 54, pp. 272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias P.V. (2005) Into the Past: A Memoir, Wits University Press/Picador Africa, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tuniz, C., Gillespie, R., Jones, C. (2010). Ritorno alla terra. In: I lettori di ossa. I blu. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1198-4_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics