Frontotemporal Approach

  • Giorgio Iaconetta
  • Enrique Ferrer
  • Alberto Prats Galino
  • Joaquim Enseñat
  • Matteo de Notaris


The frontotemporal approach, popularized by Yasargil for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms [1], is still one of the most versatile and widely used approaches in contemporary neurosurgery. It has also been employed for a large number of other applications, such as lesions of the sellar region, the cavernous sinus, and the anterior and middle cranial fossa, and as a basic module for more complex approaches to the skull base. The widely recognized advantage of the frontotemporal craniotomy is the enhanced exposure of deep neurovascular structures, which offer a shorter and wider view of the surgical target. The immediate release of cerebrospinal fluid from the basal cisterns and the early visualization of the neurovascular structures result in a significant reduction in brain retraction and preservation of the normal vascular anatomy. Furthermore, it allows the early identification of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery, thus providing an early proximal vascular control.


Facial Nerve Posterior Cerebral Artery Superficial Temporal Artery Oculomotor Nerve Sylvian Fissure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Yasargil MG (1984) Microneurosurgery, vol 1. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krause F (1908) Chirurgie des Gehirns und Rückenmarks: Nach eigenen Erfahrungen, vol I. Urban and Schwarzenberg, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dandy WE (1918) A new hypophysis operation. Devised by Dr. G. J. Heuer. Bull John Hopkins Hosp 29:154–155Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heuer GJ (1920) Surgical experience with an intracranial approach to chiasmal lesions. Arch Surg 1:368–381Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borden WB, Tamargo RJ (2002) George J Heuer: forgotten pioneer neurosurgeon at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. J Neurosurg 96:1139–1146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM et al (2005) Quantitative anatomic study of three surgical approaches to the anterior communicating artery complex. Neurosurgery 56:397–405; discussion 397–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gonzalez LF, Crawford NR, Horgan MA et al (2002) Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery 50:550–555; discussion 555–557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MacCarty CS (1961) The surgical treatment of intracranial meningiomas. Charles C. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iaconetta G, Fusco M, Samii M (2003) The sphenopetroclival venous gulf: a microanatomical study. J Neurosurg 99:366–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rhoton AL Jr (1980) Anatomy of saccular aneurysms. Surg Neurol 14:59–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yasargil MG, Fox JL (1975) The microsurgical approach to intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol 3:7–14PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giorgio Iaconetta
    • 1
  • Enrique Ferrer
    • 2
  • Alberto Prats Galino
    • 3
  • Joaquim Enseñat
    • 2
  • Matteo de Notaris
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept of Neurological Science, Division of NeurosurgeryUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IINaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Clinic, Faculty of MedicineUniversitat de BarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of MedicineUniversitat de BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations