Skip to main content

Diagnostic Performance

  • Chapter
Biostatistics for Radiologists

Abstract

The performance of a diagnostic examination1 can be basically considered as its degree of accuracy, namely its ability to find the subjects affected with a given disease as positive and the subjects not affected with same disease as negative. The indices which in different ways measure this performance are defined measures of diagnostic performance and the studies aimed at measuring the diagnostic performance of an examination or, more often, at comparing the diagnostic performance of two or more examinations, are defined studies of diagnostic performance.

For the sake of clarity, we will avoid naming a radiologic examination as a test as much as possible. Although this term is entirely correct, we prefer to use the term exam or examination in order to avoid confusion with statistical tests. Exceptions will be pretest probability and post-test probability for a given disease which we will approach with Bayes’ theorem to represent the ability of each diagnostic test to increase or decrease the probability of a given disease in the subjects who underwent the examination with a positive or a negative result, respectively. Other rare exceptions will be evident from the context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American College of Radiology (2003) ACR breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS): breast imaging atlas. Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd JD (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4 — appraise and apply diagnostic radiology literature. Radiology 242:342–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan TJ (1975) Nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 293:257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malone DE, Staunton M (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: step 5 (evaluate)-caveats and common questions. Radiology 243:319–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P et al (2004) Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathology examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1149–1157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobue T, Moriyama N, Kaneko M et al (2002) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose helical computed tomography: anti-lung cancer association project. J Clin Oncol 20:911–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Diagnostic Performance. In: Biostatistics for Radiologists. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1133-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1133-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1132-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1133-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics