Over the past three decades, the following view has gained increasing favor throughout the medical community: clinical practice should be based on the critical evaluation of the results obtained from medical scientific research. Today this evaluation is greatly favored by Internet which provides instantaneous online access to the most recent studies even before they appear in print form. The possibility of instantaneously accessing quality-filtered and relevance-filtered secondary publications (meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and guidelines) has become real in routine practice.


Diagnostic Performance Evidence Base Medicine Health Technology Assessment External Evidence Radiologic Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acheson L, Mitchell L (1993) The routine antenatal diagnostic imaging with ultrasound study. The challenge to practice evidence-based obstetrics. Arch Fam Med 2:1229–1231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American College of Radiology (2003) ACR breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS): Breast Imaging Atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston, VaGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrivé L, Tubiana JM (2002) “Evidence-based” radiology. J Radiol 83:661PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr HJ, Ohlhaber T, Finder C (2006) Focusing in on dose reduction: the FDA perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1716–1717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett JD (2003) Evidence-based radiology problems. Covered stent treatment of an axillary artery pseudoaneurysm: June 2003-June 2004. Can Assoc Radiol J 54:140–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackmore CC (2003) Evidence-based imaging evaluation of the cervical spine in trauma. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 13:283–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackmore CC (2004) Critically assessing the radiology literature. Acad Radiol 11:134–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brealey SD; Damask (Direct Access to Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessment for Suspect Knees) Trial Team (2007) Influence of magnetic resonance of the knee on GPs’ decisions: a randomised trial. Br J Gen Pract 57:622–629Google Scholar
  9. Bui AA, Taira RK, Dionisio JD et al (2002) Evidence-based radiology: requirements for electronic access. Acad Radiol 9:662–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen WA, Giauque AP, Hallam DK et al (2003) Evidence-based approach to use of MR imaging in acute spinal trauma. Eur J Radiol 48:49–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Council of the European Union (1997) Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation with medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. J Eur Commun L 180:22–27 ( Scholar
  12. Dixon AK (1997) Evidence-based diagnostic radiology. Lancet 350:509–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodd JD (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4 — Appraise and apply diagnostic radiology literature. Radiology 242:342–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dodd JD, MacEneaney PM, Malone DE (2004) Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature. Eur Radiol 14:915–922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erden A (2004) Evidence based radiology Tani Girisim Radyol 10:89–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Evidence-Based Radiology Working Group (2001) Evidence-based radiology: a new approach to the practice of radiology. Radiology 220:566–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fineberg HV, Bauman R, Sosman M (1977) Computerized cranial tomography. Effect on diagnostic and therapeutic plans. JAMA 238:224–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 11:88–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galli G (2002) Guida alla statistica nelle scienze radiologiche. Ecoedizioni internazionali, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilbert FJ, Grant AM, Gillan MGC (2004) Low back pain: influence of early MR imaging or CT on treatment and outcome — multicenter randomized trial. Radiology 231:343–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giovagnoni A, Ottaviani L, Mensà A et al (2005) Evidence based medicine (EBM) and evidence based radiology (EBR) in the follow-up of the patients after surgery for lung and colon-rectal carcinoma. Radiol Med 109:345–357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Goergen SK, Fong C, Dalziel K, Fennessy G (2003) Development of an evidence-based guideline for imaging in cervical spine trauma. Australas Radiol 47:240–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenhalgh T (2006) How to read a paper. The basics of evidence-based medicine. 3rd ed. Blackwell, Oxford, England: ix-xii (a); 1-3 (b)Google Scholar
  24. Guillerman RP, Brody AS, Kraus SJ (2002) Evidence-based guidelines for pediatric imaging: the example of the child with possible appendicitis. Pediatr Ann 31:629–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hillman BJ, Gatsonis CA (2008) When is the right time to conduct a clinical trial of a diagnostic imaging technology? Radiology 248:12–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hollingworth W, Jarvik JG (2007) Technology assessment in radiology: putting the evidence in evidence-based radiology. Radiology 244:31–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hunink MG, Glasziou PP, Siegel JE et al (2001) Decision making in health and medicine: integrating evidence and values. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001Google Scholar
  28. Hunink MG, Krestin GP (2002) Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology. Radiology 222:604–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jarvik JG (2002) Study design for the new millennium: changing how we perform research and practice medicine. Radiology 222:593–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jordan HS, Bert RB, Chew P et al (2003) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy for brain tumors. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD:109Google Scholar
  31. Kainberger F, Czembirek H, Frühwald F et al (2002). Guidelines and algorithms: strategies for standardization of referral criteria in diagnostic radiology. Eur Radiol 12:673–679PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuhl CK, Träber F, Schild HH (2008) Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR imaging in clinical practice. Part I. Technical considerations and clinical applications. Radiology 246:675–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Launois R (2003) Economic assessment, a field between clinical research and observational studies. Bull Cancer 90:97–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee JM, Kopans DB, McMahon PM et al (2008). Breast cancer screening in BRCA1 mutation carriers: effectiveness of MR imaging-Markov Monte Carlo decision analysis. Radiology 246:763–771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liedberg J, Panmekiate S, Petersson A, Rohlin M (1996) Evidence-based evaluation of three imaging methods for the temporomandibular disc. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25:234–241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mackenzie R, Dixon AK (1995) Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework. Clin Radiol 50:513–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malone DE (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: an introduction to the series. Radiology 242:12–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malone DE, Staunton M (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: step 5 (evaluate)-Caveats and common questions. Radiology 243:319–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matowe L, Gilbert FJ (2004) How to synthesize evidence for imaging guidelines. Clin Radiol 59:63–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Medina LS, Aguirre E, Zurakowski D (2003) Introduction to evidence-based imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 13:157–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Medina LS, Blackmore CC (2006) Evidence-based imaging. 1st edn. Springer, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  42. Medina LS, Blackmore CC (2007) Evidence-based radiology: review and dissemination. Radiology 244:331–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Möller-Hartmann W, Herminghaus S, Krings T et al (2002) Clinical application of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the diagnosis of intracranial mass lesions. Neuroradiology 44:371–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mukerjee A (1999) Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Magnetic resonance imaging in acute knee haemarthrosis. J Accid Emerg Med 16:216–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Oei EH, Nikken JJ, Ginai AZ et al; From the Program for the Assessment of Radiological Technology (ART Program) (2008) Costs and effectiveness of a brief MRI examination of patients with acute knee injury. Eur Radiol 2008 Sep 16. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  46. Ouwendijk R, de Vries M, Stijnen T et al; From the Program for the Assessment of Radiological Technology (2008) Multicenter randomized controlled trial of the costs and effects of noninvasive diagnostic imaging in patients with peripheral arterial disease: the DIPAD trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1349–1357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Plevritis SK (2005) Decision analysis and simulation modeling for evaluating diagnostic tests on the basis of patient outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:581–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Prasad KN, Cole WC, Haase GM (2004) Radiation protection in humans: extending the concept of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) from dose to biological damage. Br J Radiol 77:97–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Raymond J, Trop I (2007) The practice of ethics in the era of evidence-based radiology. Radiology 244:643–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. RCR Working Party (1998) Making the best use of a department of clinical radiology: guidelines for doctors. 4th edn. The Royal College of Radiologists, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA et al (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Semelka RC, Armao DM, Elias J Jr, Huda W (2007) Imaging strategies to reduce the risk of radiation in CT studies, including selective substitution with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:900–909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Soares HP, Kumar A, Daniels S et al (2005) Evaluation of new treatments in radiation oncology: are they better than standard treatments? JAMA 293:970–978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sunshine JH, Applegate KE (2004) Technology assessment for radiologists. Radiology 230:309–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Taïeb S, Vennin P (2001) Evidence-based medicine: towards evidence-based radiology. J Radiol 82:887–890PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Thornbury JR (1994) Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Thornbury JR (1999) Intermediate outcomes: diagnostic and therapeutic impact. Acad Radiol 6[suppl 1]:S58–S65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tonelli MR (1998) The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicine. Acad Med 73:1234–1240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Trinder L (2000) A critical appraisal of evidence-based practice. In: Trinder L, Reynolds S (eds) Evidence-based practice: a critical appraisal. Blackwell Science, Oxford, England:212–214Google Scholar
  60. van Beek EJ, Malone DE (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology education: why and how should we teach it? Radiology 243:633–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. White SJ, Ashby D, Brown PJ (2000) An introduction to statistical methods for health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 4:i–iv, 1-59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A et al (1999) Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 318:527–530PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2009

Personalised recommendations