Advertisement

Laboratory for Patients at Risk of Multiple Primary Malignancies

  • Marcello Caggiano
  • Angela Mariano
  • Massimiliano Zuccaro
  • Sergio Spiezia
  • Marco Clemente
  • Vincenzo Macchia
Part of the Updates in Surgery book series (UPDATESSURG)

Abstract

Biomarkers are a useful laboratory diagnostic approach for the non-invasive early detection of disease and recurrent disease. An ideal tumor marker is a protein or protein fragment that can be easily detected in the patient’s blood or urine, but is not detectable in healthy people. The first of such biomarkers to be used in laboratory testing was carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), introduced in 1965. Other biomarkers currently in use are CA 19-9 (gastrointestinal tumors), CA125 (ovarian cancer), Ca 15-3 (breast cancer). However, while the levels are very low in healthy people they become substantially elevated only when a considerable amount of cancer is present. Moreover, these markers are for the most part not specific for a single tumor. Women with breast cancer or gynecological disease may have elevated CEA and CA 125. Another cancer biomarker, and perhaps the best known one, is prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which allows for the early detection of prostate disease. The serum PSA test is used in screening programs for prostate cancer and has brought about a dramatic increase in early detection of the disease. Nonetheless, for most cancers biomarkers with high specificity and sensibility are lacking, which limits our ability to screen the majority of tumors. PSA, for example, is very sensitive but has low specificity. It remains the only tumor biomarker certified by the US Food and Drug Administration for widespread screening, which is carried out along with digital rectal examination. Technological advances in genomic and proteomics have produced candidate markers with screening potential.

Keywords

Ovarian Cancer Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Lynch Syndrome Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Islet Cell Tumor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Torre GC, Varaldo E, Bottaro P (2004) State of the art in the diagnosis and therapy of the MEN1 and MEN2 syndromes. G Chir 25(4): 109–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boland CR (2007) Evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 5(11):851–873PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shuin T, Yamasaki I, Tamura K et al (2006) Von Hippel Lindau disease: molecular pathological basis, clinical criteria, genetic testing, clinical features of tumors and treatment. Jpn J Clin Oncol 36(6):337–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Touitou Y, Bogdan A, Lévi F et al (1996) Disruption of the circadian patterns of serum cortisol in breast and ovarian cancer patients: relationship with tumor marker antigens. Br J Cancer 74(8): 1248–1252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    River L, Silverstein J, Tope JW (1976) Benign neoplasm of the small intestine: a critical comprehensive review with reports of 20 new cases. Int Abstr Surg 102:1Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Latchford A, Greenhalf W, Vitone LJ et al (2006) Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and screening for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93(12):1446–1455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar Y, Tapuria N, Kirmani N, Davidson BR (2007) Tumour M2-pyruvate kinase: a gastrointestinal cancer marker. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19(3):265–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ouyang DL, Chen JJ, Getzenberg RH, Schoen RE (2005) Noninvasive testing for colorectal cancer: a review. Am J Gastroenterol 100(6): 1393–1403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alessandro R, Belluco C, Kohn EC (2005) Proteomic approaches in colon cancer: promising tools for new cancer markers and drug target discovery. Clin Colorectal Cancer 4(6):396–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bendardaf R, Lamlum H, Pyrhönen S (2004) Prognostic and predictive molecular markers in colorectal carcinoma. Anticancer Res 24(4): 2519–2530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Noo ME, Tollenaar RA, Deelder AM, Bouwman LH (2006) Current status and prospects of clinical proteomics studies on detection of colorectal cancer: hopes and fears. World J Gastroenterol 12(41):6594–6601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duffy MJ, van Dalen A, Haglund C et al (2007) Tumour markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines for clinical use. Eur J Cancer 43(9): 1348–1360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gray MA (2005) Clinical use of serum prostate-specific antigen: a review. Clin Lab 51(3-4):127–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bast RC Jr, Badgwell D, Lu Z et al (2005) New tumor markers: CA125 and beyond. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15(Suppl 3):274–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gadducci A, Cosio S, Carpi A et al (2004) Serum tumor markers in the management of ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer. Biomed Pharmacother 58(1):24–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gadducci A, Cosio S, Zola P et al (2007) Surveillance procedures for patients treated for epithelial ovarian cancer: a review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17(1):21–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lumachi F, Basso SM (2004) Serum tumor markers in patients with breast cancer. Exper Rev Anticancer Ther 4(5):921–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anderson JE, Hansen LL, Mooren FC et al (2006) Methods and biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer and other diseases: towards personalized medicine. Drug Resist Updat 9(4-5): 198–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cho-Chung YS (2006) Autoantibody biomarkers in the detection of cancer. Biochim BiophysActa 1762(6):587–591Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Srivastava S (2006) Molecular screening of cancer: the future is here. Mol Diagn Ther 10(4):221–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wiesner A (2004) Detection of tumor markers with ProteinChip technology. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 5(1):45–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chatterjee SK, Zetter BR (2005) Cancer biomarkers: knowing the present and predicting the future. Oncology 37–50Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcello Caggiano
    • 1
  • Angela Mariano
    • 2
  • Massimiliano Zuccaro
    • 1
  • Sergio Spiezia
    • 3
  • Marco Clemente
    • 1
  • Vincenzo Macchia
    • 2
  1. 1.Surgical, Anesthesiology-rianimative and Emergency Sciences DepartmentFederico II UniversityNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of MedicineFederico II UniversityNaplesItaly
  3. 3.Unit of Screening and Follow-up for Hereditary and Familial Cancer, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and OncologyFederico II UniversityNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations