Estratto
Gli strumenti di visualizzazione dei dati volumetrici ottenuti da un esame di colonscopia virtuale (CV) sono determinanti ai fini di una corretta analisi delle immagini. Infatti, la variabilità dei risultati ottenuti dagli studi di confronto tra CV e colonscopia ottica può essere spiegata non solo dalla diversa esperienza dei lettori, dai parametri tecnici utilizzati e dalla preparazione del paziente (incluso l’utilizzo di tecniche di marcatura dei residui fluidi e fecali), ma anche dalla variabilità delle metodologie di visualizzazione e dei software utilizzati [1, 2, 3].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliografia
Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291:1713–1719
Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA et al (2003) Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:311–319
Glick SW (2007) 3D virtual dissection display proves to be the display format for reviewing CT colonography examinations? Radiology 244:629–630
Johnson KT, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG et al (2006) CT colonography using 360-degree virtual dissection: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:90–95
Doshi T, Rusinak D, Halvorsen RA et al (2007) CT colonography: false-negative interpretations. Radiology 244:165–173
Dalrymple NC, Prasad SR, Freckleton MW et al (2005) Introduction to the language of three-dimensional imaging with multidetector CT. RadioGraphics 25:1409–1428
Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG et al (1999) Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. RadioGraphics 19:745–764
Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ et al (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1451–1456
Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB, Karadi C et al (1999) Display modes for CT colonography. II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies. Radiology 212:203–212
McFarland E, Brink J, Pilgram T et al (2001) Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two-and three-dimensional image-display techniques. Radiology 218:375–383
Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IW et al (2003) Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 228:878–885
Pickhardt PJ (2004) Translucency rendering in 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a useful tool for increasing polyp specificity and decreasing interpretation time. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:429–436
Silva AC, Wellnitz CV, Hara AK (2006) Three-dimensional virtual dissection at CT Colonography: Unraveling the colon to search for lesions. Radiographics 26:1669–1686
Kim SH, Lee JM, Eun HW et al (2007) Two-versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography. Radiology 244:852–64
Rogalla P, Bender A, Bick U et al (2000) Tissue transition projection (TTP) of the intestines. Eur Radiol 10:806–810
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferrari, R., Caruso, D., Laghi, A. (2008). Software di visualizzazione. In: La colonscopia virtuale. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1067-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1067-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1066-6
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1067-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)