Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pulizia intestinale

  • Chapter
La colonscopia virtuale

  • 416 Accesses

Estratto

La pulizia intestinale è un passaggio preliminare fondamentale per un esame di colonscopia virtuale (CV) e ha lo scopo di rimuovere quanto più possibile i residui fluidi e fecali solidi dal colon, che sono causa di errori d’interpretazione. Solo un colon pulito può consentire una precisa identificazione e caratterizzazione anche di piccole lesioni.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Mang T, Maier A, Plank C et al (2007) Pitfalls in multidetector row CT colonography: a systematic approach. Radiographics 27(2):431–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yee J (2002) CT colonography: examination prerequisites. Abdom Imaging 27(3):244–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL et al (1999) CT colonography: potential pitfalls and problem-solving techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(5):1271–1278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gelfand DW, Chen MYM, Ott DJ (1991) Preparing the colon for the barium enema examination. Radiology 178(3):609–613

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kember PG, McBride KD, Tweed CS, Collins MC (1995) A blinded prospective trial of low-residue versus normal diet in preparation for barium enema. Br J Radiol 68(806):128–129

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hellström M, Brolin I (1987) Dietary fibers in the preparation of the bowel for diagnostic barium enema. Gastrointest Radiol 12(1):76–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fork FT (1987) Granulated wheat-fibres as a diet additive preceding colon cleansing for colonography. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 129:165–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis GR, Santa Ana CA, Morawski SG et al (1980) Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion. Gastroenterology 78:991–995

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. DiPalma JA, Brady CE (1989) Colon cleansing for diagnostic and surgical procedures: polyethylene glycolelectrolyte lavage solution. Am J Gastroenterol 84(9):1008–1016

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I et al (2001) Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218:274–277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Golub RW, Kerner BA, Wise WE Jr et al (1995) Colonoscopic bowel preparations-which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 38:594–599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas G, Brozinsky JI (1982) Patient acceptance and effectiveness of a balanced lavage solution (Golytely) versus the standard preparation for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 82:435–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hookey LC, Depew WT, Vanner SJ (2004) A prospective randomized trial comparing low-dose oral sodium phosphate plus stimulant laxatives with large volume polyethylene glycol solution for colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 99:2217–2222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Adams WJ, Meagher AP, Lubowski DZ, King DW (1994) Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum 37(3):229–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. (2008) A randomized controlled trial of a new 2 litre polyethylene glycol solution versus sodium picosulphate + magnesium citrate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. Curr Med Res Opin Jan 4 [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  16. Curran MP, Plosker GL (2004) Oral sodium phosphate solution: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser. Drugs 64(15):1697–1714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ginnerup Pedersen B, Møller Christiansen TE, Viborg Mortensen F et al (2002) Bowel cleansing methods prior to CT colonography. Acta Radiol 43:306–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SH, Choi BI, Han JK et al (2006) CT colonography in a Korean population with a high residue diet: comparison between wet and dry preparations. Clin Radiol 61:483–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathus-Vliegen EM, Kemble UM (2006) A prospective randomized blinded comparison of sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for safe bowel cleansing. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23(4):543–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vanner SJ, Macdonald PH, Paterson WG et al (1990) A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparations of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 85(4):422–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Frommer D (1997) Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 40(1):100–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS, King PD (1993) Prospective, randomized trail comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 39(5):631–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Afridi SA, Barthel JS, King PD et al (1995) Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphatebisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 41(5):485–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Arezzo A (2000) Prospective randomized trial comparing bowel cleaning preparations for colonscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10(4):215–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ehrenpreis ED, Nogueras JJ, Botoman VA et al (1996) Serum electrolyte abnormalities secondary to Fleet’s Phospho-Soda colonscopy prep. Surg Endosc 10(10):1022–1024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vukasin P, Weston LA, Beart RW (1997) Oral Fleet Phospho-Soda laxative-induced hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemic tetany in an adult: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 40(4):497–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fass R, Do S, Hixson LJ (1993) Fatal hyperphosphatemia following Fleet Phospho-Soda in a patient with colonic ileus. Am J Gastroenterol 88(6):929–932

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. (2006) Food and Drug Administration science background paper: acute phosphate nephropathy and renal failure associated with the use of oral sodium phosphate bowel cleansing products. http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/-infopage/OSP_solution/backgrounder.htm

    Google Scholar 

  29. Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J, D’Agati VD (2005) Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an under-recognized cause of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 16(11):3389–3396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Desmeules S, Bergeron MJ, Isenring P (2003) Acute phosphate nephropathy and renal failure. N Engl J Med 349:1006–1007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Hinshaw JL et al (2007) Prospective blinded trial comparing 45-ml and 90-ml doses of oral sodium phosphate for bowel preparation before computed tomographic colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:53–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bartram CI (1994) Bowel preparation-principles and practice. Clin Radiol 49:365–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wiberg JJ, Turner GG, Nuttall FQ (1978) Effect of phosphate or magnesium cathartics on serum calcium: observations in normocalcemic patients. Arch intern Med 138:1114–1116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharma VK, Chockalingham SK, Ugheoke EA et al (1998) Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 47(2):167–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Forbes GM, Edwards JT, Foster NM et al (2005) Randomized single blind trial of two low-volume bowel preparations for screening computed tomography colonography. Abdom Imaging 30(1):48–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bosworth HB, Rockey DC, Paulson EK et al (2006) Prospective comparison of patient experience with colon imaging tests. Am J Med 119:791–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellström M (2002) Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222:337–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Juchems MS, Ehmann J, Brambs HJ, Aschoff AJ (2005) A retrospective evaluation of patient acceptance of computed tomography colonography (“virtual colonoscopy”) in comparison with conventional colonoscopy in an average risk screening population. Acta Radiol 46:664–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. van Gelder RE, Birnie E, Florie J et al (2004) CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study. Radiology 233:328–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D et al (2005) Intraindividual comparison of patient acceptability of multidetector-row CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema. Clin Radiol 60:207–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP et al (2003) Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:913–921

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D et al (2002) Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue? Eur Radiol 12:1410–1415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS et al (2003) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227:378–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Magee C et al (2006) Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability. Radiology 239:149–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JH (2003) Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:799–805

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG et al (2001) CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 219:693–698

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M et al (2004) Laxativefree CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:945–948

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C et al (2004) Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 127:1300–1311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Maki DD, Birnbaum BA, Chakraborty DP et al (1999) Renal cyst pseudoenhancement: beam-hardening effects on CT numbers. Radiology 213:468–472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Birnbaum BA, Maki DD, Chakraborty DP et al (2002) Renal cyst pseudoenhancement: evaluation with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Radiology 225:83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J et al (2002) Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224:393–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pickhardt PJ (2007) Screening CT colonography: how I do it. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:290–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Taylor SA, Slater A, Burling DN et al (2008) CT colonography: optimization, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging. Eur Radiol 18:32–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Johnson KT, Carston MJ, Wentz RJ et al (2007) Development of a cathartic-free colorectal cancer screening test using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:W29–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Johnson CD, Manduca A, Fletcher JG et al (2008) Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: performance with and without electronic stool subtraction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:361–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Skucas J (1997) Anaphylactoid reactions with gastrointestinal contrast media AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:962–964

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Del Frate C et al (2005) Polyp size following electronic subtraction cleansing for CT colonography using a colon phantom. Radiology 236:118–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. O’Connor SD, Summers RM, Choi JR et al (2006) Oral contrast adherence to polyps on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:51–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Sapienza Università di Roma I Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia Polo Pontino ICOT Latina, Italia

    Prof. Andrea Laghi & Dott. Fabrizio Vecchietti

  2. Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Sapienza Università di Roma I Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma

    Dott. Franco Iafrate

Authors
  1. Prof. Andrea Laghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dott. Franco Iafrate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dott. Fabrizio Vecchietti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Laghi, A., Iafrate, F., Vecchietti, F. (2008). Pulizia intestinale. In: La colonscopia virtuale. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1067-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1067-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1066-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1067-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation