Advertisement

Orbit and Visual Pathways

  • Bidyut K. Pramanik
  • David M. Yousem

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are excellent imaging modalities that have significantly enhanced orbital imaging in the diagnosis of ocular and orbital lesions. CT is excellent in the evaluation of the bony orbit and is the imaging modality of choice for most trauma situations. One of the most important roles played by CT is in the detection of calcification, which is crucial in the diagnosis of retinoblastoma. It is also the first choice in suspected orbital infection, especially from sinus disease. Also, orbital metallic foreign bodies are a contraindication to MRI. Rapid scanning allows for motion-free imaging and avoids the need for sedation in pediatric patients. However, it is also important to remember that CT imaging results in a radiation dose of 50 mGy to the lens. Most orbital lesions can be evaluated by CT; however, the increased spatial resolution of MRI allows better depiction of the globe, optic nerve, and orbital apex, and improved evaluation of the intracranial extension of disease. MRI differentiates among the various tissues based on signal characteristics and thus aids in differential diagnosis.

Keywords

Optic Nerve Optic Neuritis Uveal Melanoma Cavernous Hemangioma Noonan Syndrome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Suggested Reading

  1. Ansari SA, Mafee MF (2005) Orbital cavernous hemangioma: role of imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 15(1):137–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chung EM, Specht CS, Schroeder JW (2007) From the archives of the AFIP: pediatric orbit tumors and tumor-like lesions: neuroepithelial lesions of the ocular globe and optic nerve. Radiographics (4):1159–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kapur R, Mafee MF, Lamba R, Edward DP (2005) Orbital schwannoma and neurofibroma: role of imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 15(1):159–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mafee MF, Ainbinder D, Afshani E, Mafee RF (1996) The eye. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 6(1):29–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mafee MF, Dorodi S, Pai E (1999) Sarcoidosis of the eye, orbit, and central nervous system. Role of MR imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 37(1):73–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mafee MF, Inoue Y, Mafee RF (1996) Ocular and orbital imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 6(2):291–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tan WS, Wilbur AC, Mafee MF (1987) The role of the neuroradiologist in vascular disorders involving the orbit. Radiol Clin North Am 25(4):849–861PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wenig BM, Mafee MF, Ghosh L (1998) Fibro-osseous, osseous, and cartilaginous lesions of the orbit and paraorbital region. Correlative clinicopathologic and radiographic features, including the diagnostic role of CT and MR imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 36(6):1241–1259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bidyut K. Pramanik
    • 1
  • David M. Yousem
    • 2
  1. 1.New York University School of MedicineNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Johns Hopkins Medical InstituteBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations