Advertisement

MDCT pp 279-294 | Cite as

CT Angiography of the Neck and Brain

  • David S. Enterline

Abstract

The evolution of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has allowed the development and advancement of CT angiography (CTA). While the concept of carotid artery evaluation by CT was introduced by Heinz and others in 1984 [1,2], it has taken recent technological advances to bring the current methods into practice. CTA of the neck is used primarily to assess the carotid vessels. As CTA slice thickness and rendering methods have improved, so has the accuracy of stenosis determination. More recently, CTA of the neck has become the standard for traumatic injury. Routine utilization of CTA for the evaluation of carotid and vertebral arteries is now the norm. The technique also has been successfully applied to the intracranial vasculature. Detection of cerebral aneurysms and other vascular diseases are readily identified.

Keywords

Internal Carotid Artery Magnetic Resonance Angiography Vertebral Artery Basilar Artery Maximum Intensity Projection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Heinz ER, Fuchs J, Osborne D et al (1984) Examination of the extracranial carotid bifurcation by thin-section dynamic CT: direct visualization of intimal atheroma in man (Part 2). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 5(4):361–366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heinz ER, Pizer SM, Fuchs H et al (1984) Examination of the extracranial carotid bifurcation by thin-section dynamic CT: direct visualization of intimal atheroma in man (Part 1). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 5(4):355–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Enterline D, Lowry CR, Tanenbaum LN (2005) Brain, and head and neck applications. In: Multidetector CT protocols developed for GE scanners. BDI, Princeton, pp E1–57Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M et al for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1998) Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 12:339(20):1415–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1991) MRC European carotid surgery trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–90%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 337:1235–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hobson RW 2nd, Weiss DG, Fields WS et al (1993) The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 28:328(4):221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    CASANOVA Study Group (1991) Carotid surgery versus medical therapy in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 22(10):1229–1235Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (1995) Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273: 1421–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J et al for the MRC asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST) collaborative group (2004) Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 363:1491–1502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnston DCC, Goldstein LB (2001) Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: Noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Neurology 56:1009–1015PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM et al (2002) Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73(1):21–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F et al (2001) Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 220(1):179–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berne JD, Norwood SH, McAuley CE, Villareal DH (2004) Helical computed tomographic angiography: an excellent screening test for blunt cerebrovascular injury. J Trauma 57(1):11–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bash S, Villablanca JP, Jahan R et al (2005) Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26(5):1012–1021PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldsher D, Shreiber R, Shik V (2004) Role of multisection CT angiography in the evaluation of vertebrobasilar vasospasm in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25(9):1493–1498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dammert S, Krings T, Moller-Hartmann W (2004) Detection of intracranial aneurysms with multislice CT: comparison with conventional angiography. Neuroradiology 46(6):427–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoh BL, Cheung AC, Rabinov JD (2004) Results of a prospective protocol of computed tomographic angiography in place of catheter angiography as the only diagnostic and pretreatment planning study for cerebral aneurysms by a combined neurovascular team. Neurosurgery 54(6):1329–1340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kangasniemi M, Makela T, Koskinen S et al (2004) Detection of intracranial aneurysms with two-dimensional and three-dimensional multislice helical computed tomographic angiography. Neurosurgery 54(2):336–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karamessini MT, Kagadis GC, Petsas T et al (2004) CT angiography with three-dimensional techniques for the early diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. Comparison with intra-arterial DSA and the surgical findings. Eur J Radiol 49(3):212–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    White PM, Teasdale EM, Wardlaw JM, Easton V (2001) Intracranial aneurysms: CT angiography and MR angiography for detection prospective blinded comparison in a large patient cohort. Radiology 219(3):739–749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators (1998) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med 339:1725–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rajpal S, Niemann DB, Turk AS (2005) Transverse venous sinus stent placement as treatment for benign intracranial hypertension in a young male: case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 102[Suppl 3]: 342–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Casey SO, Alberico RA, Patel M et al (1996) Cerebral CT venography. Radiology 198:163–170PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • David S. Enterline
    • 1
  1. 1.Divisions of Neuroradiology and Interventional NeuroradiologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations