Advertisement

General Rules for Decontamination Following an Outbreak of Avian Influenza or Newcastle Disease

  • Maria Serena Beato
  • Paola De Benedictis

Abstract

Rapid application of strict biosecurity measures is the first step to prevent and control the introduction of avian influenza (AI) or Newcastle disease (ND) viruses. Biosecurity comprises two elements: bio-exclusion and bio-containment. Bio-exclusion includes all measures aimed at excluding infectious agents from uninfected premises. It requires the prevention of direct and indirect contact of infected animals or contaminated inanimate carriers (fomites) with poultry. Bio-containment includes all measures aimed at maintaining the infection within the premises from where the diagnosis was first obtained. Decontamination of the infected farm is one of the actions that must be adopted during the biocontainment process (EFSA 2005). Secondary spread of AI and ND is achieved mainly through human-related activities, such as the movement of staff, vehicles, equipment and other fomites. Further outbreaks may occur following restocking of birds in establishments that have not been adequately sanitised.

Keywords

Avian Influenza Newcastle Disease Compost Pile Meat Meal Animal Carcase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlvers D (2003) Personal communication to Justin Kastner regarding Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine incinerator: Dennis Ahlvers (Physical Plant Supervisor, Kansas State University)Google Scholar
  2. Ausvetplan Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan, Version 3.1, 2006. Disease Strategy. Avian influenza. Interim DraftGoogle Scholar
  3. Ausvetplan Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan, Version 3.1, 2006. Disease Strategy. Newcastle diseaseGoogle Scholar
  4. Ausvetplan Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan. Operational Procedures Manual Disposal, Version 3.0, 2007. Carcass Disposal: A Comprehensive Review National Agricultural Biosecurity Center Consortium USDAAPHIS Cooperative Agreement Project Carcass Disposal Working Group, August 2004Google Scholar
  5. Ausvetplan Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan. Operational. Procedures Manual, Version 3.0, 2006. Destruction of animals: A manual of techniques of humane destructionGoogle Scholar
  6. Ausvetplan Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan. Operational Procedures Manual, 2000. DecontaminationGoogle Scholar
  7. Ausvetplan Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan. Persistence of Disease Agents in Carcases and Animal Products. Report for Animal Health Australia, by Scott Williams. Consulting Pty Ltd Revised — December 2003Google Scholar
  8. Beard CW, Hanson HP (1984) Newcastle Disease. In: Diseases of poultry. Hofstad MS, Bames HJ, Calnek BW, Reid WM, Yoder HW (eds), 8th ed, Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, pp. 452–470Google Scholar
  9. Berglez B (2003) Disposal of poultry carcases in catastrophic avian influenza outbreaks: A comparison of methods (technical report for Master of Public Health). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  10. Carr L, Broide HL, John HM et al (1998) Composting catastrophic event poultry mortalities. Maryland: University of Maryland & Maryland Cooperative Extension. Retrieved April 21, 2003, from http://www.agnr.umd.edu/MCE/Publications/Publication.cfm?ID=35Google Scholar
  11. Crane N (1997) Animal disposal and the environment. State Veterinary Journal 7(3):3–5Google Scholar
  12. Davison S, Benson CE, Ziegler AF, Eckroade RJ (1999) Evaluation of disinfectants with the addition of antifreezing compounds against non pathogenic H7N2 avian influenza virus. Avian Dis 43(3):533–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Benedictis P, Beato MS, Capua I (2007) Inactivation of avian influenza viruses by chemical agents and physical conditions: a review. Zoonoses Public Health 54(2):51–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. EFSA (2005) Animal health and welfare aspects of Avian Influenza. The EFSA Journal 266:1–21Google Scholar
  15. Ellis D (2001) Carcass disposal issues in recent disasters, accepted methods, and suggested plan to mitigate future events (applied research project for Master of Public Administration). San Marcos, Texas: Texas State University — San Marcos (formerly Southwest Texas State University)Google Scholar
  16. EPAA European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (2002) Abattoirs: air emission control. Retrieved June 19, 2003, from http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/mao/abattoirs.htmGoogle Scholar
  17. Flory GA, Peer RW, Bendfeldt ES (2006) Evaluation of Poultry Carcass Disposal Methods Used During an Avian Influenza Outbreak in Virginia in 2002. Virginia Department of Environmental QualityGoogle Scholar
  18. Ford G (2003) Disposal Technology Seminar on Air-Curtain Incineration. Kansas City, Missouri: Midwest Regional Carcass Disposal ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  19. Ford WB (1994) Swine carcass disposal evaluation using air curtain incinerator system, model TCh.2. ?Incineration 25:359 (Foreign Animal Disease Report, 22-2; reprinted by Air Burners, LLC, at http://www.airburners.com/DATAFILES_Tech/ab_swine_report.pdf). Washington: USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection ServiceGoogle Scholar
  20. Freedman R, Fleming R (2003) Water quality impacts of burying livestock mortalities. Livestock Mortality Recycling Project Steering Committee, August 2003, Ridgetown. Ontario, Canada. Available at http://www.ridgetownc.on.ca/research/documents/fleming_carcassburial.pdfGoogle Scholar
  21. Glanville TD (1993) Groundwater impacts of onfarm livestock burial. Iowa Groundwater Quarterly 4:21–22Google Scholar
  22. Glanville TD (2000) Impact of livestock burial on shallow groundwater quality. Paper presented at ASAE Mid-Central Meeting. St. Joseph, Missouri (No. MC00-116)Google Scholar
  23. Haug RT (1993) The practical handbook of compost engineering. Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers. Press, IncGoogle Scholar
  24. Hickman M (2003) Disposal of END waste in southern California by landfill. Kansas City, Missouri: Midwest Regional Carcass Disposal ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  25. Keener HM, Elwell DL, Monnin MJ (2000) Procedures and equations for sizing of structures and windrows for composting animal mortalities. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 16(6):681–692Google Scholar
  26. Mukhtar S, Auvermann BW, Heflin K, Boriack CN (2003) A low maintenance approach to large carcass composting. Paper written for presentation at the 2003 ASAE Annual International Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada. Paper Number: 032263Google Scholar
  27. Murphy DW, Carr LE (1991) Composting dead birds. Extension Sections in Departments of Poultry Science and Agricultural Engineering, University of Maryland at College Park. Fact sheet 537. Retrieved on April 11, 2003 from http://www.agnr.umd.edu/MCE/Publications/Publication.cfm?ID=145&cat=3Google Scholar
  28. NABC National Agricultural Biosecurity Center Consortium. USDA APHIS Cooperative Agreement Project. Carcass Disposal Working Group, August 2004. Carcass Disposal: A Comprehensive ReviewGoogle Scholar
  29. NAO National Audit Office (2002) The 2001 outbreak of foot and mouth disease. London: UK. National Audit OfficeGoogle Scholar
  30. Noll H, Youngner JS (1959) Virus-lipid interactions. II. The mechanism of adsorption of lipophilic viruses to water-insoluble polar lipids. Virology 8(3):319–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ockerman HW, Hansen CL (2000) Rendering: Animal byproduct processing and utilization. Washington, DC: CRC Press LLCGoogle Scholar
  32. Osue (2000) Ohio’s livestock and poultry mortality composting manual. Columbus, Ohio, USA: The Ohio State University Extension, available at http://www.oardc.ohiostate.edu/ocamm/Keener-Maine%20Mortality%20Paper%205-24-05.pdfGoogle Scholar
  33. Ritter WF, Chirnside AE (1990) Dead bird disposal and ground-water quality. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Agricultural and Food Processing Wastes, Chicago, Illinois, pp 414–423Google Scholar
  34. Ritter WF, Chirnside AE (1995) Impact of dead bird disposal pits on ground-water quality on the Delmarva Peninsula. Bioresource Technology 53:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Riverside County Waste Management Department. Landfill fees. Retrieved September 10, 2003, from http://www.rivcowm.org/landfill_fees_02.htmGoogle Scholar
  36. Romans JR, Costello WJ, Carlson CW et al (2001) Packing house by-products. In: The Meat We Eat. Danville, Illinois: Interstate Publishers, IncGoogle Scholar
  37. Rynk R (1992) On-farm composting handbook, Ithaca, New York: Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering ServiceGoogle Scholar
  38. Samberg Y, Meroz M (1995) Application of disinfectants in poultry hatcheries. Rev Sci Tech 14(2):365–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. UK Environment Agency (2001) The environmental impact of the foot and mouth disease outbreak: an interim assessmentGoogle Scholar
  40. US EPA, 40 CFR Part 258 — Criteria for municipal solid waste landfillsGoogle Scholar
  41. US EPA. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. (1995) Decision-makers’ guide to solid waste management (Vol. 2). WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  42. UKDEFRA United Kingdom Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (2000). The BSE Inquiry: The Report. Vol. 13: Industry Processes and Controls. Ch. 6: Rendering. Annex B: Manufacturing process of rendering. Retrieved June 10, 2003, from http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/report/volume13/chapterj.htmGoogle Scholar
  43. Widdrington FMD, Liaison Committee. Submission to Northumberland FMD InquiryGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Serena Beato
    • 1
  • Paola De Benedictis
    • 1
  1. 1.OIE/FAO and National Reference Laboratory for Newcastle Disease and Avian Influenza, Virology DepartmentIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle VenezieLegnaro, PadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations