Two- and Three-dimensional Ultrasonography in Abscess and Anal Fistula
Three-dimensional anorectal ultrasound presents an important role in the evaluation of cryptoglandular disease of the anal canal. It clearly shows the location, extent of the abscess cavity, and relation to the sphincter muscles and rectal wall, making classification possible, which is particularly important for the complex abscess. It is also particularly useful for evaluating anorectal fistulas, as it identifies primary and secondary tracts, internal opening, and adjacent cavities. This information facilitates surgical planning, consequently preventing recurrence and fecal incontinence.
KeywordsAnal Sphincter Anal Canal External Anal Sphincter Internal Anal Sphincter Anal Fistula
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Seow-Choen, Phillips RKS (1991) Insights gained from the management of problematic anal fistulae at St. Mark’s Hospital, 1984–1988. Br J Surg 78:539–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangwan YP, Ronsen L, Riether RD et al (1994) Is simple fistula in ano simple? Dis Colon Rectum 37:885–889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunniss PJ, Barker PG, Sultan AH et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula in ano. Dis Colon Rectum 37:708–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoro GA, Fortling B (2007) The advantages of volume rendering in three-dimensional endosonography of the anorectum. Dis Colon Rectum 50(3):359–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudol-Szopinska I, Jakubowski W, Szczepkowski M (2002) Contrast-enhanced endosonography for the diagnosis of anal and ano-vaginal fistulas. J Clin Ultrasound 30(3):145–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker J, Rociu E, Schouten WR, Lameris JS (2002) Anovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas: endoluminal sonography versus endoluminal MR imaging. AJR AM J Roentgenol 178(3):737–741Google Scholar
© Springer-Verlag Italia 2008