Two-dimensional Introital Sonography in Patterns of Anorectal Prolapse in Women
The anal cross-sectional area on 2D introital ultrasonography (IUS) represents a new sensitive index capable of providing both superior anatomic details and clear depiction of anorectal prolapse in women. The parameter is calculated at rest and on straining by outlining the inner and the outer margin of the hypoechoic internal anal sphincter (IAS) and measuring the included area at the level of the middle anal canal in the axial plane. Average values of the inner area (1.08 ± 0.25 cm2 vs 3.02 ± 0.73 cm2), as well as the inner-to-outer ratio (49.6 ± 8.2 % vs 81.3 ± 2.9 %) and percentage increase on straining (Δ-0.007 vs +0.42) have been found by us to differ significantly (p < 0.01) in control groups (n = 10) and patients with rectal prolapse (n = 20). Further differentiation is made possible at sonography between those patients with rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation as their main presenting symptom from those with staining episodes and/or fecal incontinence by noting whether or not the integrity of the anal sphincter is preserved. Thanks to rapid advances in technology and recent refinements in interpretation, IUS can be considered, especially in young female patients, the best imaging modality to start with in assessing rectal prolapse in a safe and noninvasive manner.
KeywordsPelvic Floor Fecal Incontinence Anal Sphincter Anal Canal Rectal Prolapse
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Ekberg O, Mahieu PHG, Bartram CI et al (1990) Defecography: dynamic radiological imaging in proctology. Gastroenterol Int 3:63–69Google Scholar
- 5.Piloni V, Spazzafumo L (2007) Sonography of the female pelvic floor: clinical indications and techniques. Pelviperineology 26:59–65Google Scholar
- 6.Rubens DJ, Strang JG, Bogineni-Misra S et al (1988) Transperineal sonography of the rectum: anatomy and pathology revealed by sonography compared with CT and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:637–642Google Scholar
- 11.Alexander AA, Liu JB, Merton DA et al (1997) Fecal incontinence: transvaginal US evaluation of anatomic causes Radiology 199:529–532Google Scholar
- 19.Piloni VL, Bazzocchi A, Golfieri R (2007) Functional imaging in rectal prolapse. In: Altomare DF, Pucciani F (eds) Rectal prolapse. Springer-Verlag Italia, pp 21–32Google Scholar