Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

  • 793 Accesses

Abstract

The staging systems of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are based on pathological findings. The most common classification systems are the TNM UICC/AJCC classification (6th edn.) 2002 [1] and the TNM classification of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ) (2nd English edn.) 2003 [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (2003) General rules for clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer, 2nd English Edition. Kanehara, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roayaie S, Guarrera JV, Ye MQ et al (1998) Aggressive surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: predictors of outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 187(4):365–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kinoshita H, Tanimura H, Uchiyama K et al (2002) Prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after surgical treatment. Oncol Rep 9(1):97–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fu XH, Tang ZH, Zong M et al (2004) Clinicopathologic features, diagnosis and surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in 104 patients. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 3(2):279–283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamasaki S (2003) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: macroscopic type and stage classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 10(4):288–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Miwa S, Miyagawa S, Kobayashi A et al (2006) Predictive factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma recurrence in the liver following surgery. J Gastroenterol 41(9):893–900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohtsuka M, Ito H, Kimura F et al (2002) Results of surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and clinicopathological factors influencing survival. Br J Surg 89(12):1525–1531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ikai I, Arii S, Ichida T et al (2005) Report of the 16th follow-up survey of primary liver cancer. Hepatol Res 32(3):163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Isa T, Kusano T, Shimoji H et al (2001) Predictive factors for long-term survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg 181(6):507–511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nozaki Y, Yamamoto M, Ikai I et al (1998) Reconsideration of the lymph-node metastasis pattern (N factor) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for primary liver carcinoma. Cancer 83(9):1923–1929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Fruhauf NR et al (2005) Extended hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC): when is it worthwhile? Single center experience with 27 resections in 50 patients over a 5-year period. Ann Surg 241(1):134–143

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Uenishi T, Yamazaki O, Yamamoto T et al (2005) Serosal invasion in TNM staging of massforming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12(6):479–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Uenishi T, Hirohashi K, Kubo S et al (2001) Clinicopathological factors predicting outcome after resection of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 88(7):969–974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morimoto Y, Tanaka Y, Ito T et al (2003) Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 10(6):432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Inoue K, Makuuchi M, Takayama T et al (2000) Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of mass-forming type cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 127(5):498–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimada M, Yamashita Y, Aishima S et al (2001) Value of lymph node dissection during resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 88(11):1463–1466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Okami J, Dono K, Sakon M et al (2003) Patterns of regional lymph-node involvement in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma of the left lobe. J Gastrointest Surg 7(7):850–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T (1999) Lymph-node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Jpn J clin Oncol 29(3):147–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ikai J, Itai Y, Okita K et al (2004) Report of the 15th follow-up survey of primary liver cancer. Hepatol Res 28:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guglielmi, A., Ruzzenente, A., Iacono, C. (2008). Staging Systems. In: Surgical Treatment of Hilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0729-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0729-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0728-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0729-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics