Skip to main content

The Use of Prosthetic Mesh in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

  • Chapter
  • 1618 Accesses

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

Abstract

The laparoscopic technique in ventral hernia repair, first proposed by the Blanche in 1993 [1], has been progressively accepted and used because of the benefits associated with laparoscopy: shorter hospital stay, more rapid return to functional independence and reduction in the complications linked to decreased mobility. In the case of abdominal-wall surgery, and ventral hernias in particular, there are no significant benefits in terms of aesthetics and a reduction in acute postoperative pain, although these are the hallmarks of a laparoscopic approach. Even standardisation of the technique is not yet uniform, since questions and basic research are still on going relating to the use of different fixation media, either in addition to transfascial suturing or alone. Nor has there yet been any conclusive definition of an ideal prosthesis for intraperitoneal implantation, generally delivered by the laparoscopic route, despite anecdotal reports of procedures using extraperitoneal prostheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV (1993) Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using polytetrafluoroetylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:39–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vrijland WW, Jeekel J, Steyberg EW et al (2000) Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh repair of incisional hernia is not associated with enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg 87:348–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bickel A, Evitan A (1999) A simplified laparoscopic technique for mesh placement in ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 13:532–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carbajo MA, Martin del Olmo JC, Blanco J (2000) What is the appropriate mesh for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernia? Surg Endosc 14:408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zieren J, Neuss H, Ablassmaier B, Muller JM (2002) Adhesions after intraperitoneal mesh repair in pigs: prolene vs Vypro. J Laparoend Adv Surg Techn 4:249–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Conze J, Junge K, Klinge U et al (2005) Intraabdominal adhesion formation by polypropylene mesh. Surg Endosc 19:798–803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. van’t Riet M, de Vos van Steenwijk P, Bonthuis F et al (2003) Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh. Ann Surg 237:123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schug-Pass C, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, Kockerling F (2006) A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias. Surg Endosc 20:402–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burger JWA, Halm JA, Wijsmuller AR et al (2006) Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 20:1320–1325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutchinson RW, Chagnon M (2003) Preclinical studies on abdominal adhesions to surgical mesh. Proceedings Ethicon, INC Somerville, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jacob BP, Hogle NJ, Durak E et al (2007) Tissue ingrowth and bowel adhesion formation in an animal comparative study: polypropylene versus Proceed versus Parietex Composite. Surg Endosc 21:629–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Borrazzo EC, Belmont MF, Boffa D, Fowler DL (2004) Effect of prosthetic material on adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model. Hernia 8:108–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McGinty JJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, Fowler DL (2005) A comparative study of adhesion formation and abdominal wall ingrowth after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model, using multiple types of mesh. Surg Endos 19:786–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moreno Egea A, Torralba JA, Girela E et al (2004) Immediate, early and late morbidity with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and tolerance to composite mesh. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14:130–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias. Ann Surg 238:391–400

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carbajo MA, Martin del Olmo JC, Blanco JI (2003) Laparoscopica approach to incisional hernia. Surg Endosc 17:118–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ben-Haim M, Kuriansky J, Tal R et al (2002) Pitfalls and complications with laparoscopic intraperitoneal expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch repair of postoperative ventral hernia. Surg Endosc 16:785–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carbonell AM, Matthews BD, Dreau D et al (2005) The susceptibility of prosthetic biomaterials to infection. Surg Endosc 19:430–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maathews BD, Mostafa G, Carbonell AM (2003) An evaluation of adhesion formation and host tissue response to PTFE mesh and biosurgical composites. SAGES, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eid GM, Prince JM, Mattar GM, Hamad G (2003) Medium-term follow up confirms the safety and durability of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with PTFE. Surgery 134:599–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Majercik S, Tsikitis V, Iannitti DA (2006) Strength of tissue attachment to mesh after ventral hernia repair with synthetic composite mesh in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 20:1671–1674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saxena AK, Willital GH (2002) Omphalocele: clinical review and surgical experience using dura patch graft. Hernia 6:73–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kapan S, Kapan M, Goksoy E et al (2003) Comparison of PTFE, pericardium bovine and fascia lata for repair of incisional hernia in rat model, experimental study. Hernia 7:39–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown-Etris M, Cutshall WD, Hiles MC (2002) A new biomaterial derived from small intestine submucosa and developed into a wound matrix device. Wounds 14:150–166

    Google Scholar 

  25. Helton WS, Fisichella PM, Berger R et al (2005) Short term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. Arch Surg 140:549–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schug-Paß, Tamme C, Kockerling F (2004) Biocompatibility of laparoscopically placed intra-abdominal meshes. In: Kockerling F (ed) Surgical techniques. Science Med Dr Sperber, Hannover, pp 2–9

    Google Scholar 

  27. Junge K, Klinge U, Prescher A et al (2001) Elasticity of the abdominal wall and impact for repair of incisional hernias using mesh implants. Hernia 3:113–118

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fidanza, F., Simonatto, G. (2008). The Use of Prosthetic Mesh in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair. In: Incisional Hernia. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0722-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0722-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0721-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0722-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics