Abstract
Physical examination has traditionally been, and continues to be, the mandatory initial step in the evaluation of patients with constipation or faecal incontinence. This is because the initial treatment decision and the necessity of further investigations of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction depend on primary clinical assessment of the patient [1]. Even if authors [2] found good correlation between clinical assessment and defecography in high-grade intussusceptions when studying subjects with defecatory difficulties, several reports in the nonradiologic literature have documented the relative insensitivity of the history and physical examination in diagnosing the cause of constipation and detecting pelvic organ prolapse [11, 3–6]. The common clinical physical examination tends to underestimate the degree of prolapse and may be able to diagnose only 30–40% of rectal prolapse [7]. Therefore, the precise preoperative diagnosis supplied by defecography can help in the selection of a rationale treatment programme, placing the patient into a treatment-defined group, determining the type of operation and giving objective evidence for the corrective scope and degree of operation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Altringer WE, Saclarides TJ, Dominguez JM et al (1995) Four-contrast defecography: pelvic “floor-oscopy”. Dis Colon Rectum 38:695–699
Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Vilotte J et al (1993) How accurate is clinical examination in diagnosing and quantifying pelvirectal disorders? A prospective study in a group of 50 patients complaining of defecatory difficulties. Dis Colon Rectum 36:430–438
Borowitz SM, Sutphen J, Ling W et al (1996) Lack of correlation of anorectal manometry with symptoms of chronic childhood constipation and encopresis. Dis Colon Rectum 39:400–405
Grotz RL, Pemberton JH, Talley NJ et al (1994) Discriminant value of physiological distress, symptoms profiles, and segmental colonic dysfunction in outpatients with severe constipation. Gut 35:798–802
Merkel IS, Locher J, Burgio K et al (1993) Physiologic and psychologic characteristics of an elderly population with chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 88:1854–1859
Hock D, Lombard R, Jehaes C et al (1993) Colpocystodefecography. Dis Colon Rectum 36:1015–1021
Liberman H, Hughes C, Dippolito A (2000) Evaluation and outcome of the Delorme procedure in the treatment of rectal outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 43:188–192
Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE et al (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications, Gut 30:1737–1749
Pomerri F, Zuliani M, Mazza C et al (2001) Defecographic measurements of rectal intussusception and prolapse in patients and in asymptomatic subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:641–645
McGee SG, Bartram CI (1993) Intra-anal intussusception: diagnosis by posteroanterior stress proctography. Abdom Imaging 18:136–140
Bartram CI, Turnbull GK, Lennard-Jones JE (1988) Evacuation proctography: an investigation of rectal expulsion in 20 subjects without defecatory disturbance. Gastrointest Radiol 13:72–80
Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C et al (1994) Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon rectum 37:1133–1141
Dvorkin LS, Gladman MA, Epstein J et al (2005) Rectal intussusception in symptomatic patients is different from that in asymptomatic volunteers. Br J Surg 92:866–872
Lowry AC, Simmang CL, Boulos P et al (2001) Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer: report of the Tripartite Consensus Conference on Definitions for Anorectal Physiology and Rectal Cancer, Washington, DC, May 1, 1999. Dis Colon Rectum 44:915–919
Choi JS, Hwang YH, Salum MR el al (2001) Outcome and management of patients with large rectoanal intussusception. Am J Gastroenterol 96:740–744
Stoker J, Rociu E, Wiersma TG et al (2000) Imaging of anorectal disease. Br J Surg 87:10–27
Bremmer S, Udén R, Mellgren A (1997) Defaeco-peritoneography in the diagnosis of rectal intussusception and rectal prolapse. Acta Radiol 38:578–583
Roos JE, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S et al (2002) Experience of 4 years with open MR defecography: pictorial review of anorectal anatomy and disease. Radiographics 22:817–832
Spence-Jones C, Kamm MA, Henry MM et al (1994) Bowel dysfunction: a pathogenic factor in uterovaginal prolapse and urinary stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101:147–152
Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Chiumarulo C et al (1999) Treatment of external anorectal mucosal prolapse with circular stapler: an easy and effective new surgical technique. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1102–1105
Bartram C (2003) Dynamic evaluation of the anorectum. Radiol Clin North Am 41:425–441
Stoker J, Bartram CI, Halligan S (2002) Imaging of the posterior pelvic floor. Eur Radiol 12:779–788
Pescatori M, Quondamcarlo C (1999) A new grading of rectal internal mucosal prolapse and its correlation with diagnosis and treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 14:245–249
Bouchoucha M, Devroede G, Faye A et al (2006) Colonic response to food in constipation. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:826–833
Rao SSC, Ozturk R, Laine L (2005) Clinical utility of diagnostic tests for constipation in adults: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 100:1605–1615
Mollen RM, Kuijpers HC, Claassen T (2001) Colectomy for slow-transit constipation: preoperative functional evaluation is important but not a guarantee for a successful outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 44:577–580
Nam YS, Pikarsky AJ, Wexner SD et al (2001) Reproducibility of colonic transit study in patients with chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 44:86–92
Prokesch RW, Breitenseher MJ, Kattenbach J et al (1999) Assessment of chronic constipation: colon transit time versus defecography. Eur J Radiol 32:197–203
Karasick S, Ehrlich SM (1996) Is constipation a disorder of defecation or impaired motility?: distinction based on defecography and colonic transit studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:63–66
Pomerri F, Frigo AC, Grigoletto F et al (2007) Error count of radiopaque markers in colonic segmental transit time study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W56–W59
Bouchoucha M, Devroede G, Arhan P et al (1992) What is the meaning of colorectal transit time measurement? Dis Colon Rectum 35:773–782
Farouk R, Duthie GS (1998) Rectal prolapse and rectal invagination. Eur J Surg 164:323–332
Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S et al (2004) The accuracy of clinical examination in the diagnosis of rectal intussusception. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1533–1538
Ikenberry S, Lappas JC, Hana MP et al (1996) Defecography in healthy subjects: comparison of three contrast media. Radiology 201:233–238
Goei R, van Engelshoven J, Schouten H et al (1989) Anorectal function: defecographic measurement in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology 173:137–141
Dobben AC, Wiersma TG, Janssen LW et al (2005) Prospective assessment of interobserver agreement for defecography in fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1166–1172
Ihre T, Seligson U (1975) Intussusception of the rectum-internal procidentia: treatment and results in 90 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 18:391–396
Mellgren A, Schultz I, Johansson C et al (1997) Internal rectal intussusception seldom develops into total rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 40:817–820
Kelvin FM, Hale DS, Maglinte DD et al (1999) Female pelvic organ prolapse: diagnostic contribution of dynamic cystoproctography and comparison with physical examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:31–37
Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, Fitzgerald K et al (1999) Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:439–444
Halligan S, Spence-Jones C, Kamm MA et al (1996) Dynamic cystoproctography and physiological testing in women with urinary stress incontinence and urogenital prolapse. Clin Radiol 1996 51:785–790
Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, Hale DS et al (2000) Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:81–88
Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH et al (1997) Dynamic MR imaging compared with evacuation proctography when evaluating anorectal configuration and pelvic floor movement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:775–779
Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1997) Vaginal topography does not correlate well with visceral position in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 8:336–339
Thornbury JR (1999) Intermediate outcomes: diagnostic and therapeutic impact. Acad Radiol 6(Suppl 1):S58–S65
Mackenzie R, Dixon AK (1995) Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework. Clin Radiol 50:513–518
Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 11:88–94
Bartram CI (2005) Functional anorectal imaging. Abdom Imaging 30:195–203
Dixon AK (1997) Evidence-based diagnostic radiology. Lancet 350:509–512
Harvey CJ, Halligan S, Bartram CI et al (1999) Evacuation proctography: a prospective study of diagnostic and therapeutic effects. Radiology 211:223–227
Halverson AL, Orkin BA (1998) Which physiologic tests are useful in patients with constipation? Dis Colon Rectum 41:735–739
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pomerri, F., Muzzio, P.C. (2008). Classification of Internal and External Rectal Prolapse. In: Altomare, D.F., Pucciani, F. (eds) Rectal Prolapse. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0684-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0684-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0683-6
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0684-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)