Skip to main content

Functional Imaging in Rectal Prolapse

  • Chapter
Rectal Prolapse

Abstract

Imaging data has gained great relevance in the preoperative assessment of severe pelvic organ prolapse, including vaginal vault descent, enterocele, rectocele and cystocele. This is at least partly due to inaccurate characterisation and failure to identify all of the involved sites when using physical examination alone, leading to incomplete surgical repair with subsequent persistence or recurrence of the prolapse. Despite their potential advantages in determining which organs are involved, however, available imaging procedures, i.e. contrast radiography, ultrasonography and, more recently, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), still share some important limitations, such as lack of standardisation, validation and availability. In fact, existing methods of performing examinations and measurements of individual parameters vary greatly among researchers, making comparison of study results difficult. In addition, significant differences still exist in the definition and terminology of the most common pelvic descent processes as well as in the classification and quantification systems adopted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ekberg O, Mahieu PHG, Bartram CI et al (1990) Defecography: dynamic radiological imaging in proctology. Gastroenterol Int 3:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DDT, Benson JT (1994) Evacuation proctography (defecography): an aid to the investigation of pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol 83:307–314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hock D, Lombard R, Jehaes C et al (1993) Colpocystodefecography. Dis Colon Rectum 36:1015–1021

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DDT, Benson JT et al (1994) Dynamic cystoproctography: a technique for assessing disorders of the pelvic floor in women. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:368–370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maglinte DDT, Kelvin FM, Hale DS et l (1997) Dynamic cystoproctography: a unifying diagnostic approach to pelvic floor and anorectal dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:759–767

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maglinte DDT, Kelvin FM, Fitzgerald DSH et al (1999) Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:439–444

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown MC, Sutherst JR, Murray A et al (1985) Potential use of ultrasound in place of X-ray fluoroscopy in urodynamics Br J Urol 57:88–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kohorn EI, Sciascia AL, Jeanty P et al (1986) Ultrasound cystourethrography by perineal scanning for the assessment of female stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 68:269–272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinn MJ, Beynon J, McC. Mortensen NJ et al (1988) Transvaginal endosonography: a new method to study the anatomy of the lower urinary tract in urinary stress incontinence. Br J Urology 62:103–105

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kolbl H, Bernaschek G, Wolf G (1988) A comparative study of perineal scan and urethrocystography in patients with genuine stress incontinence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 244:39–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schaer GN, Khoechli OR, Schuessler B et al (1995) Perineal ultrasound for evaluating the bladder neck in urinary stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 85:220–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Khullar V, Cardozo L, Salvatore S et al (1996) Ultrasound: a noninvasive screening test for detrusor instability. Br J Obstet Gynecol 103:904–908

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang TS, Bohm-Velez M, Mendelson EB (1993) Nongynecological applications of transvaginal sonography AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:87–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rubens DJ, Strang JG, Bogineni-Misra S et al (1988) Transperineal sonography of the rectum: anatomy and pathology revealed by sonography compared with CT and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:637–642

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sultan AH, Loder PB, Bartram CI et al (1994) Vaginal endosonography: new approach to image the undisturbed anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1296–1299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sandridge DA, Thorp JM (1995) Vaginal endosonography in the assessment of the anorectum. Obstet Gynecol 86:1007–1009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Halligan S, Northover J, Bartram CI (1996) Vaginal endosonography to diagnose enterocele. Br J Radiol 69:996–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peschers UM, DeLancey JO, Schaer GN et al (1997) Exoanal ultrasound of the anal sphincter: normal anatomy and sphincter defects. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(9):999–1003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexander AA, Liu JB, Merton DA et al (1997) Fecal incontinence: transvaginal US evaluation of anatomic causes Radiology 199:529–532

    Google Scholar 

  21. Piloni V (2001) Dynamic imaging of pelvic floor with transperineal sonography. Tech Coloproctol 5:103–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beer-Gabel M, Zbar AP (2002) Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in patients presenting with obstructed evacuation Tech Coloproctol 6:141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Piloni V, Spazzafumo L (2005) Evacuation sonography. Tech Coloproctol 9:119–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenhein NB et al (1991) Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology 179:25–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A et al (1997) Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvicfloor descent. Eur Radiol 7(8):1309–1317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fielding JR, Griffiths DJ, Versi E et al (1998) MR imaging of pelvic floor continence mechanisms in the supine and sitting positions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1607–1610

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Comiter CV, Vasavada SP, Barbaric ZL et al (1999) Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urology 54(3):454–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kelvin FM. Maglinte DDT, Hale DS et al (2000) Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:81–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. DeLancey JOL, Hurd WW (1998) Size of the urogenital hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 91:364–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Phillips SF, Edwards DAW (1965) Some aspects of anal continence and defaecation. Gut 6:396–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH et al (1997) Patterns of prolapse in women with symptoms of pelvic floor weakness: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 203:77–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pannu HK, Kaufman HS, Cundiff GW et al (2000) Dynamic MR imaging of pelvis organ prolapse: spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics 20(6):1567–1582

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tunn R, DeLancey JOL, Quint EE (2001) Visibility of pelvic organ support system structures in magnetic resonance images without an endovaginal coil. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1156–1163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chou Q, DeLancey JOL (2001) A structured system to evaluate urethral support anatomy in magnetic resonance images. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:44–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tunn R, DeLancey JOL, Howard D et al (2003) Anatomic variation in the levator ani muscle, endopelvic fascia, and urethra in nulliparas evaluated by magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188: 116–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. DeLancey JOL (1999) Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:815–823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Piloni, V.L., Bazzocchi, A., Golfieri, R. (2008). Functional Imaging in Rectal Prolapse. In: Altomare, D.F., Pucciani, F. (eds) Rectal Prolapse. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0684-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0684-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0683-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0684-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics