Skip to main content

Management of Rectal Prolapse: The Role of Laparoscopic Approaches

  • Chapter
Book cover Rectal Prolapse

Abstract

Rectal prolapse has a profound effect on quality of life and has been associated with a multitude of surgical treatment options since its original description. It is defined as a full-thickness protrusion of the rectal wall through the anal sphincter. Clinical management is confounded by the fact that whereas 75% of patients with rectal prolapse experience problems with anal incontinence, 25–50% will have significant constipation [1]–[4]. Symptoms of anal incontinence may be due to acquired changes in bowel motility or a reduction in resting anal pressure as a result of continual activation of rectoanal inhibition –7]. Constipation in patients with rectal prolapse may be a consequence of slow colonic transit or an increase in external anal sphincter contractions 4, 8. These symptoms have a significant influence on the choice of operative approach in the treatment of rectal prolapse. However, due to the variable results of operative approaches, it is unclear whether optimal treatment can be selected based on preoperative physiologic testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Madden MV, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ et al (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: prospective study evaluating changes in symptoms and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 35:48–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keighley MRB, Fielding JWL, Alexander-Williams J (1983) Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 70:229–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Madoff RD, Williams JG, Wong WD et al (1992) Longterm functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse. Am J Gastroenterol 87:101–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Metcalf AM, Loening-Baucke V (1988) Anorectal function and defecation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 155:206–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Keighley MRB, Shouler PJ (1984) Abnormalities of colonic function in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 71:892–895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matheson DM, Keighley MRB (1981) Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Gut 22:126–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon PH (1999) Rectal procidentia. In: Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S. Principles and practice of surgery for the colon, rectum, and anus. Quality Medical Publishers, St. Louis, pp. 503–540

    Google Scholar 

  8. Madoff RD (1992) Rectal prolapse and intussusception. In: Beck WE, Wexner SD, eds. Fundamentals of anorectal surgery. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 89–103

    Google Scholar 

  9. Watts JD, Rothenberger DA, Buls JG et al (1985) The management of procidentia: thirty years’ experience. Dis Colon Rectum 28:96–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eu K-W, Seow-Choen F (1997) Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical treatment. Br J Surg 84:904–911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Douard R, Frileux P, Brunel M et al (2003) Functional results after the Orr-Loygue transabdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1089–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Watkins BP, Landercasper J, Belzer E et al (2003) Long-term follow-up of the modified Delorme procedure for rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 138:498–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bartolo CC (1996) Rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 83:3–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Duthie GS, Bartolo DC (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 79:107–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Huber FT, Stein H, Siewert JR (1995) Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection. World J Surg 19:138–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kimmins MH, Evetts BK, Isler J, Billingham R (2001) The Altemeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 44:565–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Berman IR (1992) Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for procidentia: technique and implications. Dis Colon Rectum 35:689–693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carpelan-Holmström M, Kruuna O, Scheinin T (2006) Laparoscopic rectal prolapse surgery combined with short hospital stay is safe in elderly and debilitated patients. Surg Endosc 20:1353–1359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cirocco WC, Brown AC (1993) Anterior resection for the treatment of rectal prolapse: a 20-year experience. Am Surg 59:265–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Giordano P, Wexner SD (2001) The assessment of fecal incontinence in women. J Am Coll Surg 193(4): 397–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Baker R, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld M (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open resection: rectopexy offers excellent results. Dis Colon Rectum 38:199–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Boccasanta P (1999) Laparotomic vs. laparoscopic rectopexy in complete rectal prolapse. Dig Surg 16(5):415–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Boccasanta P, Rosati R, Venturi M et al (1998) Comparison of laparoscopic rectopexy with open technique in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse: clinical and functional results. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(6):460–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kessler H, Jerby BL, Milsom JW (1999) Successful treatment of rectal prolapse by laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Surg Endosc 13:858–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Darzi A, Henry MM, Guillou PJ et al (1995) Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 9:301–303

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rose J, Schneider C, Scheidbach H et al (2002) Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse: experience gained in a prospective multicenter study. Langebecks Arch Surg 387(3–4):130–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA (2002) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 89:35–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kairaluoma MV, Viljakka MT, Kellokumpu IH (2003) Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 46:355–360

    Google Scholar 

  29. Himpens J, Cadiere GB, Bruyns J, Vertruyen M (1999) Laparoscopic rectopexy according to Wells. Surg Endosc 13:139–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Xynos E, Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J et al (1999) Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: the laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 13:862–864

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Heah SM, Hartley JE, Hurley J et al (2000) Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 43(5):638–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bruch HP, Herold A, Schiedeck T, Schwandner O (1999) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1189–1195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Madbouly KM, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP et al (2003) Clinically based management of rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 17(1):99–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zittel TT, Manncke K, Haug S et al (2000) Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg 4(6):632–641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Metcalf, D.R., Senagore, A.J. (2008). Management of Rectal Prolapse: The Role of Laparoscopic Approaches. In: Altomare, D.F., Pucciani, F. (eds) Rectal Prolapse. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0684-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0684-3_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0683-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0684-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics