Management of Rectal Prolapse: The Role of Laparoscopic Approaches

  • Dan R. Metcalf
  • Anthony J. Senagore


Rectal prolapse has a profound effect on quality of life and has been associated with a multitude of surgical treatment options since its original description. It is defined as a full-thickness protrusion of the rectal wall through the anal sphincter. Clinical management is confounded by the fact that whereas 75% of patients with rectal prolapse experience problems with anal incontinence, 25–50% will have significant constipation [1]–[4]. Symptoms of anal incontinence may be due to acquired changes in bowel motility or a reduction in resting anal pressure as a result of continual activation of rectoanal inhibition –7]. Constipation in patients with rectal prolapse may be a consequence of slow colonic transit or an increase in external anal sphincter contractions 4, 8. These symptoms have a significant influence on the choice of operative approach in the treatment of rectal prolapse. However, due to the variable results of operative approaches, it is unclear whether optimal treatment can be selected based on preoperative physiologic testing.


Rectal Prolapse Anal Incontinence Sigmoid Resection Complete Rectal Prolapse Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Madden MV, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ et al (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: prospective study evaluating changes in symptoms and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 35:48–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keighley MRB, Fielding JWL, Alexander-Williams J (1983) Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 70:229–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madoff RD, Williams JG, Wong WD et al (1992) Longterm functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse. Am J Gastroenterol 87:101–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Metcalf AM, Loening-Baucke V (1988) Anorectal function and defecation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 155:206–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keighley MRB, Shouler PJ (1984) Abnormalities of colonic function in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 71:892–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matheson DM, Keighley MRB (1981) Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Gut 22:126–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gordon PH (1999) Rectal procidentia. In: Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S. Principles and practice of surgery for the colon, rectum, and anus. Quality Medical Publishers, St. Louis, pp. 503–540Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Madoff RD (1992) Rectal prolapse and intussusception. In: Beck WE, Wexner SD, eds. Fundamentals of anorectal surgery. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 89–103Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Watts JD, Rothenberger DA, Buls JG et al (1985) The management of procidentia: thirty years’ experience. Dis Colon Rectum 28:96–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eu K-W, Seow-Choen F (1997) Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical treatment. Br J Surg 84:904–911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Douard R, Frileux P, Brunel M et al (2003) Functional results after the Orr-Loygue transabdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1089–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Watkins BP, Landercasper J, Belzer E et al (2003) Long-term follow-up of the modified Delorme procedure for rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 138:498–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bartolo CC (1996) Rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 83:3–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duthie GS, Bartolo DC (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 79:107–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huber FT, Stein H, Siewert JR (1995) Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection. World J Surg 19:138–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kimmins MH, Evetts BK, Isler J, Billingham R (2001) The Altemeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 44:565–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berman IR (1992) Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for procidentia: technique and implications. Dis Colon Rectum 35:689–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carpelan-Holmström M, Kruuna O, Scheinin T (2006) Laparoscopic rectal prolapse surgery combined with short hospital stay is safe in elderly and debilitated patients. Surg Endosc 20:1353–1359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cirocco WC, Brown AC (1993) Anterior resection for the treatment of rectal prolapse: a 20-year experience. Am Surg 59:265–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giordano P, Wexner SD (2001) The assessment of fecal incontinence in women. J Am Coll Surg 193(4): 397–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baker R, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld M (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open resection: rectopexy offers excellent results. Dis Colon Rectum 38:199–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boccasanta P (1999) Laparotomic vs. laparoscopic rectopexy in complete rectal prolapse. Dig Surg 16(5):415–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Boccasanta P, Rosati R, Venturi M et al (1998) Comparison of laparoscopic rectopexy with open technique in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse: clinical and functional results. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(6):460–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kessler H, Jerby BL, Milsom JW (1999) Successful treatment of rectal prolapse by laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Surg Endosc 13:858–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Darzi A, Henry MM, Guillou PJ et al (1995) Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 9:301–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rose J, Schneider C, Scheidbach H et al (2002) Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse: experience gained in a prospective multicenter study. Langebecks Arch Surg 387(3–4):130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA (2002) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 89:35–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kairaluoma MV, Viljakka MT, Kellokumpu IH (2003) Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 46:355–360Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Himpens J, Cadiere GB, Bruyns J, Vertruyen M (1999) Laparoscopic rectopexy according to Wells. Surg Endosc 13:139–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xynos E, Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J et al (1999) Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: the laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 13:862–864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Heah SM, Hartley JE, Hurley J et al (2000) Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 43(5):638–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bruch HP, Herold A, Schiedeck T, Schwandner O (1999) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1189–1195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Madbouly KM, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP et al (2003) Clinically based management of rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 17(1):99–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zittel TT, Manncke K, Haug S et al (2000) Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg 4(6):632–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan R. Metcalf
    • 1
  • Anthony J. Senagore
    • 1
  1. 1.Ferguson ClinicSpectrum HealthGrand RapidsUSA

Personalised recommendations