Abstract
Almost all societies, once they attain a certain level of complexity, exhibit inequality in the income of its members. Hierarchical stratification of social classes may be a major contributor to such unequal distribution of income, with intra-class variation often being negligible compared to inter-class differences. In this paper, examples from different historical periods, such as 10th century Byzantium and the Mughal empire of India in the 15th century, and different kinds of organizations, such as a criminal gang in the USA and Manufacturing & IT Services companies in India, are shown to suggest a causal relation between the hierarchical structure of social organization and the observed income inequality in societies. Proceeding from the assumption that income inequality may be a consequence of resource flow in a hierarchically structured social network, we present a model to show that empirically observed long-tailed income distribution can be explained through a process of division of assets at various levels in a hierarchical organization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Persky J (1992) Pareto’s Law, J. Economic Perspectives 6: 181–192
Pareto V (1897) Cours d’Economique Politique, vol 2. Macmillan, London
Chatterjee A, Sinha S, Chakrabarti B K (2007) Economic inequality: Is it natural? E-print physics/0703201
Price T D, Feinman G M (1997) Images of the Past, 2nd edition. Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View, Calif.
Milanovic B (2006) An estimate of average income and inequality in Byzantium around year 1000, Review of Income & Wealth 52: 449–470
Duncan-Jones R (1994) Money and Government in the Roman Empire. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge
Oikonomides N (2002) The role of the Byzantine state in the economy. In: Laiou A E (ed) The Economic History of Byzantium. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Morrisson C, Cheynet J-C (2002) Prices and wages in the Byzantine world. In: Laiou A E (ed) The Economic History of Byzantium. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Richards J F (1993) The Mughal Empire. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge
Chandra S (1982) Standard of living: Mughal India. In: Raychaudhuri T, Habib I (eds) The Cambridge Economic History of India, Vol 1. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge
Habib I (1974) The social distribution of landed property in pre-British India: A historical survey. In: Sharma R S, Jha V (eds) Indian Society: Historical Probings. Peoples Publishing House, New Delhi
Mansabdar, entry in Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh (http://banglapedia.net/)
Blochmann H (1927) Translation of Ain-i Akbari by Abu’ l-fazl Allami, Vol 1, 2nd edition (ed. D C Phillott). Asiatic Society, Calcutta
Venkatesh S A, Levitt S D (2000) The financial activities of an urban street gang, Qtrly. J. Econ. 115:755–789
Baker G, Gibbs M, Holmstrom B (1994) The internal economics of the firm: Evidence from personnel data, Qtrly. J. Econ. 109: 881–919
Gibrat R (1931) Les Inégalites Économiques. Librairie du Recueil Sirey, Paris
Watts D J, Dodds P S, Newman M E J (2002) Identity and search in social networks, Science 296: 1302–1305
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sinha, S., Srivastava, N. (2007). Is Inequality Inevitable in Society? Income Distribution as a Consequence of Resource Flow in Hierarchical Organizations. In: Chatterjee, A., Chakrabarti, B.K. (eds) Econophysics of Markets and Business Networks. New Economic Windows. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0665-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0665-2_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0664-5
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0665-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)