The Macro Model of the Inequality Process and The Surging Relative Frequency of Large Wage Incomes
Revision and extension of a paper, ‘U.S. wage income since 1961: the perceived inequality trend’, presented to the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, March–April 2005, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. On-line at: http://paa2005.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submission ID=50379.
KeywordsRelative Frequency Current Population Survey Micro Model Wage Income Left Tail
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Angle J (1983) The surplus theory of social strati.cation and the size distribution of Personal Wealth. Proc. Am. Stat. Assoc., Social Statistics Section. Pp. 395–400. Alexandria, VA: Am. Stat. Assoc.Google Scholar
- 4.Angle J (1994) Frequency spikes in income distributions. Proc. Am. Stat. Assoc., Business and Economic Statistics Section, pp. 265–270.Google Scholar
- 7.Angle J (2002) Modeling the dynamics of the nonmetro distribution of wage and salary income as a function of its mean. Proc. Am. Stat. Assoc., Business and Economic Statistics Section. [CD-ROM], Alexandria, VA: Am. Stat. Assoc.Google Scholar
- 9.Angle J (2005) U.S. wage income since 1961: the perceived inequality trend. Paper presented to the Population Assoc. of America meetings, March–April 2005, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. http://paa2005.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionID=50379.
- 11.Beach C, Slotsve G (1996) Are we becoming two societies? Income Polarization and the Myth of the Declining Middle Class in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: C.D. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
- 13.Blackburn M, Bloom D (1985) What is happening to the middle class?. Am. Demographics 7(1):18–25.Google Scholar
- 15.Bradbury K (1986) The Shrinking Middle Class. New England Economic Review, September/October, pp. 41–54.Google Scholar
- 21.Chatterjee A, Chakrabarti BK, Stinchcombe RB (2005) Analyzing money distributions in ‘ideal gas’ models of markets. Practical Fruits of Econophysics, Ed. Takayasu H, pp 333–338, Springer-Verlag, Tokyo.Google Scholar
- 22.Coder J, Rainwater L, Smeeding T (1989) Inequality among children and elderly in ten modern nations: the United States in an international context. Am. Econ. Review 79(2): 320–324.Google Scholar
- 23.Current Population Surveys, March 1962–2004. [machine readable data files]/conducted by the Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census [producer and distributor], 1962–2004. Santa Monica, CA: Unicon Research Corporation [producer and distributor of CPS Utilities], 2004.Google Scholar
- 25.Duncan G, Smeeding T, Rodgers W (1993) Why is the middle class shrinking?. In Papadimitriou D. (ed.), Poverty and Prosperity in the U.S. in the Late Twentieth Century. New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
- 28.Horrigan M, Haugen S (1988) The declining middle class thesis: a sensitivity analysis. Monthly Labor Review 111(May, 1988): 3–13.Google Scholar
- 30.Kuttner R (1983) The Declining Middle. Atlantic Monthly July:60–72.Google Scholar
- 32.Levy F, Michel R (1991) The Economic Future of American Families: Income and Wealth Trends. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
- 33.Levy F, Murnane R (1992) U.S. Earnings Levels and Earnings Inequality: A Review of Recent Trends and Proposed Explanations. Journal of Economic Literature 30(3): 1333–1381.Google Scholar
- 37.Patriarca M, Chakraborti A, Kaski K, Germano G (2005) Kinetic theory models for the distirbution of wealth. arXiv:physics/0504153.Google Scholar
- 38.Thurow L (1984) The disappearance of the middle class. New York Times Vol.133(February 5):F3.Google Scholar
- 39.Unicon Research, inc. 2004. Manual for March Current Population Surveys. Santa Monica, CA: Unicon.Google Scholar
- 40.U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2005. National Income and Product Account Table 2.4.4, Price indexes for personal conumption expenditure by type of product [index numbers, 2000 = 100]. http://www.bea.gov/bea/dn/ nipaweb/TableView.asp#Mid [Last revised on August 4, 2005].
- 42.Wolfson M (1994) When inequalities diverge. Am. Econ. Review 84(#2):353–358.Google Scholar