Advertisement

Preoperative Care of the Newborn with Myelomeningocele

  • M. Memet Özek

Abstract

Children with spina bifida comprise one of the largest groups of patients for whom pediatric neurosurgeons care. Management of these children is extraordinarily complex and may require the integrated efforts of caregivers from many disciplines.

Keywords

Spina Bifida Neural Tube Defect Chiari Malformation Delivery Room Craniocervical Junction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Volpe J (2001) Neural tube formation and prosencephalic development. In: Volpe J (ed) Neurology of the newborn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 3–44Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elias ER, Hobbs N (1998) Spina Bifida: Sorting out the complexities of care. Contemp Pediatr 15:156–171Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lewis D, Tolosa JE, Kaufmann M et al (2004) Elective cesarean delivery and long term motor function or ambulation status in infants with meningomyelocele. Obstet Gynecol 103:469–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martinez JF, Molto MA, Pagan JA (2001) Latex allergy in patients with spina bifida and treatment. Neurocirugia 12(1):36–42Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaufman B (2004) Neural tube defects. Pediatr Clin N Am 51:389–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buck D, Michael T, Wahn U et al (2000) Ventricular shunts and the prevalence of sensitization and clinically relevant allergy to latex in patients with spina bifida. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 11:111–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Degenhardt P, Golla S, Wahn F et al (2001) Latex allergy is dependent on repeated operations in the first year of life. J Pediatr Surg 36:1535–1539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Obojski A, Chodorski J, Barg W et al (2002) Latex allergy and sensitization in children with spina bifida. Pediatr Neursurg 37:262–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rendeli C, Nucera E, Ausili E et al (2006) Latex sensitization and allergy in children with myelomeningocele. Childs Nerv Syst 22:28–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kattwinkel J (2006) Textbook of neonatal resuscitation, 5th edn. American Association of Pediatrics/ American Heart Association, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lynam L, Verklan MT (2004) Neurologic disorders. In: Verklan MT, Walden M (eds) Core curriculum for neonatal intensive care. Saunders Elsevier, St Louis, pp 821–857Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brand MC (2006) Examining the newborn with an open spinal dysraphism. Adv Neonatal Care 6(4):181–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cohen AR, Robinson S (2001) Early management of myelomeningocele. In: McLone DG (ed) Pediatric neurosurgery. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 241–258Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dias MS (1999) Myelomeningocele. In: Choux M, Di Rocco C, Hockley AD, Walker ML (eds) Pediatric neurosurgery. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 33–59Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Punt J (2001) Surgical management of neural tube defects. In: Levene MI, Chervenak FA, Whittle MJ (eds) Fetal and neonatal neurology and neurosurgery. Churchill Livingstone, London, Edinburgh, New York, pp 753–773Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Snodgrass WT, Adams R (2004) Initial urologic management of myelomeningocele. Urol Clin N Am 31:427–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Northrup H, Volcik K (2000) Spina bifida and other neural tube defects. Curr Probl Pediatr 30:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Griebe ML, Oakes WJ, Worley G (1991) The Chiari Malformation associated with myelomeningocele. In: Rekate HL (ed) Comprehensive management of spina bifida. CRC Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McLone D (1998) Care of the neonate with a myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Clin North Am 9:111–120Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clark RH, Bloom BT, Spitzer AR et al (2006) Empiric use of Ampicillin and Cefotaxime, compared with Ampicillin and Gentamicin, for neonates at risk for sepsis is associated with an increased risk of neonatal death. Pediatrics 117:67–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oi S, Matsumoto S (1992) A proposed grading and scoring system for spina bifida: Spina bifida neurological scale. Childs Nerv Syst 8:337–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Glard Y, Launay F, Viehweger E et al (2007) Neurological classification in myelomeningocele as a spine deformity predictor. J Pediatr Orthop 16:287–292Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bartonek A, Saraste H, Knutson LM (1999) Comparison of different systems to classify the neurological level of lesion in patients with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 41:796–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hah YS (1995) Open myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Clin North Am 9:231–241Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sival DA, Brouwer JL, Bruggink JS et al (2006) Movement analysis in neonates with spina bifida aperta. Early Hum Dev 82:227–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McDonald CM, Jaffe KM, Mosca VS et al (1991) Ambulatory outcome of children with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 33:482–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sanders C, Driver CP, Rickwood AM (2002) The anocutaneous reflex and urinary continence in children with myelomeningocele. BJU Int 89:720–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Punt J (2001) Surgical management of neural tube defects. In: Levene MI, Chervenak FA, Whittle MJ (eds) Fetal and neonatal neurology and neurosurgery. Churchill Livingstone, London, Edinburgh, New York, pp 753–773Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kirpalani HM, Parkin PC, Willan AR et al (2000) Quality of life in spina bifida: importance of parental hope. Arch Dis Child 83:293–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Memet Özek
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Pediatric NeurosurgeryMarmara University Medical CenterIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations