Abstract
Health care expenditure in the most economically advanced countries seems to have spiraled out of control over the last few decades. There are three main reasons accounting for this situation: ageing of the population has led to an increase in the numbers requiring health care services, the accelerating pace of technological development has given rise to new techniques that have improved the quality of treatment, and with the introduction of new, increasingly costly, products, patient expectations have changed and patients thus demand better medical treatment. The combination of these three factors has resulted in health care spending becoming increasingly difficult to control.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Samuelson PA (1947) Foundations Of Economic Analysis, Harvard University. Press Cambridge
Drummond MF, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press
Attanasio E, Bruzzi P, Capri S et al (1999) Raccomandazioni per la conduzione degli studi di farmacoeconomia: la guida GISF. Mecosan 20:65–72
Torrance GW (1986) Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 5:1–30
Deutekom M, Dobben AC, Dijkgraaf MGW et al (2005) Cost of outpatients with fecal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:552–558
Ratto C, Di Bidino R, Ponzi P et al (2005) Preliminary results from a prospective study protocol on the assessment of costs for faecal incontinence. In: Proceedings of the 2nd annual meeting of Health Technology Assessment International, Rome, Italy 20–22 June 2005. Italian Health Ministry. Ricoveri, diagnosi, interventi effettuati e durata delle degenze di tutti gli ospedali. http://www.ministerosalute.it/programmazione/sdo/ric_informazioni/default.jsp. Cited 16 Mar 2007
Cerzani M, Cornago D, Garattini L (2006) I dispositivi per assorbenza: modalità di acquisto e distribuzione in Italia. Economia & Politica del Farmaco 7:20–26
Morris A, Ho MT, Lapsley H et al (2005) Cost of managing urinary and faecal incontinence in a sub-acute care facility: a “bottom-up“ approach. Neurourol Urodyn 24:56–62
Sells H, McDonagh R (1999) Psychological aspects of incontinence. In: Lucas M, Emery S, Beynon J (eds) Incontinence. Blackwell Science Oxford, pp 1–11
Bharucha AE, Zinmeister AR, Loche GR et al (2005) Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women. Gastroenterology 129:42–49
Papanicolaou S, Pons ME, Hampet C et al (2005) Medical resource utilisation and cost of care for women seeking treatment for urinary incontinence in an outpatient setting. Example from three countries participating in the PURE study. Maturitas 52(Suppl 2): S35–S47
Kinchen KS, Long S, Chang S et al (2005) The direct cost of stress urinary incontinence among women in Medicaid population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193: 1936–1944
Miner PB (2004) Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology 126(1 Suppl 1):S8–S13
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ratto, C., Ponzi, P., Stasi, F.D., Parello, A., Donisi, L., Doglietto, G.B. (2007). Social Aspects and Economics of Fecal Incontinence. In: Ratto, C., Doglietto, G.B., Lowry, A.C., PÃ¥hlman, L., Romano, G. (eds) Fecal Incontinence. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0638-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0638-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0637-9
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0638-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)