Skip to main content

Social Aspects and Economics of Fecal Incontinence

  • Chapter
Fecal Incontinence

Abstract

Health care expenditure in the most economically advanced countries seems to have spiraled out of control over the last few decades. There are three main reasons accounting for this situation: ageing of the population has led to an increase in the numbers requiring health care services, the accelerating pace of technological development has given rise to new techniques that have improved the quality of treatment, and with the introduction of new, increasingly costly, products, patient expectations have changed and patients thus demand better medical treatment. The combination of these three factors has resulted in health care spending becoming increasingly difficult to control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Samuelson PA (1947) Foundations Of Economic Analysis, Harvard University. Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drummond MF, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  3. Attanasio E, Bruzzi P, Capri S et al (1999) Raccomandazioni per la conduzione degli studi di farmacoeconomia: la guida GISF. Mecosan 20:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  4. Torrance GW (1986) Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 5:1–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Deutekom M, Dobben AC, Dijkgraaf MGW et al (2005) Cost of outpatients with fecal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:552–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ratto C, Di Bidino R, Ponzi P et al (2005) Preliminary results from a prospective study protocol on the assessment of costs for faecal incontinence. In: Proceedings of the 2nd annual meeting of Health Technology Assessment International, Rome, Italy 20–22 June 2005. Italian Health Ministry. Ricoveri, diagnosi, interventi effettuati e durata delle degenze di tutti gli ospedali. http://www.ministerosalute.it/programmazione/sdo/ric_informazioni/default.jsp. Cited 16 Mar 2007

  7. Cerzani M, Cornago D, Garattini L (2006) I dispositivi per assorbenza: modalità di acquisto e distribuzione in Italia. Economia & Politica del Farmaco 7:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morris A, Ho MT, Lapsley H et al (2005) Cost of managing urinary and faecal incontinence in a sub-acute care facility: a “bottom-up“ approach. Neurourol Urodyn 24:56–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sells H, McDonagh R (1999) Psychological aspects of incontinence. In: Lucas M, Emery S, Beynon J (eds) Incontinence. Blackwell Science Oxford, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bharucha AE, Zinmeister AR, Loche GR et al (2005) Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women. Gastroenterology 129:42–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Papanicolaou S, Pons ME, Hampet C et al (2005) Medical resource utilisation and cost of care for women seeking treatment for urinary incontinence in an outpatient setting. Example from three countries participating in the PURE study. Maturitas 52(Suppl 2): S35–S47

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kinchen KS, Long S, Chang S et al (2005) The direct cost of stress urinary incontinence among women in Medicaid population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193: 1936–1944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miner PB (2004) Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology 126(1 Suppl 1):S8–S13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ratto, C., Ponzi, P., Stasi, F.D., Parello, A., Donisi, L., Doglietto, G.B. (2007). Social Aspects and Economics of Fecal Incontinence. In: Ratto, C., Doglietto, G.B., Lowry, A.C., PÃ¥hlman, L., Romano, G. (eds) Fecal Incontinence. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0638-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0638-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0637-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0638-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics