Skip to main content

Epidemiology of Faecal Incontinence

  • Chapter
  • 1067 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the prevalence and incidence rate of faecal incontinence in the general population and specific subgroups, including the elderly and children. Epidemiological definitions are described, and problems with measuring faecal incontinence are discussed. Descriptive studies of prevalence and incidence rates are reviewed, including demographic determinants and the reliability of the prevalence estimates. A thorough discussion of risk factors for the development of faecal incontinence is covered elsewhere in this volume. Having highlighted the need for valid, reliable measurement tools, an example of such a tool is given for use in epidemiologic studies.

Keywords

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome
  • Faecal Incontinence
  • Rectal Prolapse
  • Bowel Motion
  • Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-0638-6_2
  • Chapter length: 17 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-88-470-0638-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Macmillan AK, Merrie AEH, Marshall RJ, Parry BR (2004) The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1341–1349

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Drossman DA (1999) The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome II process. Gut 45:1–5

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Drossman DA, Corazziare E, Talley NJ et al (eds) Rome II. The functional gastrointestinal disorders. Allen, Lawrence

    Google Scholar 

  4. Whitehead WE, Wald A, Diamant NE et al (1999) Functional disorders of the anus and rectum. Gut 45:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  5. Loening-Baucke V (1997) Fecal incontinence in children. Am Fam Physician 55:2229–2235

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Voskuijl WP, Heijmans J, Heijmans HSA et al (2004) Use of Rome II criteria in childhood defecation disorders: Applicability in clinical and research practice. J Pediatr 145:213–217

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Benninga MA, Buller HA, Heymans HSA et al (1994) Is encopresis always the result of constipation? Arch Dis Child 71:186–193

    PubMed  CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Rasquin-Weber A, Hyman PE, Cucchiara S et al (1999) Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gut 45(Suppl 2):II60–II68

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Lorenzo C, Benninga MA (2004) Pathophysiology of pediatric fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126:S33–S40

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Dare OO, Cleland JG (1994) Reliability and validity of survey data on sexual behaviour. Health Transit Rev 4:93–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB (eds) (1983) Handbook of survey research. Academic Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas TM, Egan M, Walgrove A, Meade TW (1984) The prevalence of faecal and double incontinence. Community Med 6:216–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Giebel GD, Lefering R, Troidl H, Blochl H (1998) Prevalence of fecal incontinence: what can be expected? Int J Colorectal Dis 13:73–77

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Johanson JF, Lafferty J (1996) Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 91:33–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalantar JS, Howell S, Talley NJ (2002) Prevalence of faecal incontinence and associated risk factors; an underdiagnosed problem in the Australian community? Med J Aust 176:54–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lam TCF, Kennedy ML, Chen FC et al (1999) Prevalence of faecal incontinence: obstetric and constipation-related risk factors; a population-based study. Colorectal Disease 1:197–203

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Siproudhis L, Pigot F, Godeberge P et al (2006) Defecation disorders: A French population survey. Dis Colon and Rectum 49:219–227

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Talley NJ, O’Keefe EA, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: A population-based study. Gastroenterology 102:895–901

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bellman M (1966) Studies on encopresis. Acta Paediatr Scand 170(Suppl):3–151

    Google Scholar 

  20. van der Plas RN, Benninga MA, Redekop WK et al (1997) How accurate is the recall of bowel habits in children with defaecation disorders? Eur J Pediatr 156:178–181

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen A, Hansen B, Dahm T (1997) Urinary tract infection, day wetting and other voiding symptoms in sevento eight-year-old Danish children. Acta Paediatr 86:1345–1349

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van der Wal MF, Benninga MA, Hirasing RA (2005) The prevalence of encopresis in a multicultural population. J Paediatr Gastroenter Nutr 40:345–348

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Macmillan AK (2004) Design and validation of the New Zealand Faecal Incontinence Questionnaire. Masters thesis, University of Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  24. O’Donnell LJD, Virjee J, Heaton KW (1990) Detection of pseudodiarrhoea by simple clinical assessment of intestinal transit rate. BMJ 300:439:440

    Google Scholar 

  25. Heaton KW, Ghosh S, Braddon FEM (1991) How bad are the symptoms and bowel dysfunction of patients with the irritable bowel syndrome? A prospective, controlled study with emphasis on stool form. Gut 32:73–79

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Heaton KW, Radvan J, Cripps H et al (1992) Defecation frequency and timing, and stool form in the general population: a prospective study. Gut 33:818–824

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severitry index. Dis Colon Rectum 42(12):1525–1531

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (2000) Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:9–17

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Macmillan, A.K., Merrie, A.E.H. (2007). Epidemiology of Faecal Incontinence. In: Ratto, C., Doglietto, G.B., Lowry, A.C., Påhlman, L., Romano, G. (eds) Fecal Incontinence. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0638-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0638-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0637-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0638-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)