Advertisement

Postanal Pelvic Floor Repair

  • Saleh M. Abbas
  • Ian P. Bissett

Abstract

Postanal repair was developed by Sir Allan Parks in the 1970s [1] and popularised in the early 1980s for patients with neuromyopathic faecal incontinence. The original objective of this operation was to restore the anorectal angle, which was thought to be an important factor in continence. In 1975, Parks suggested the flap-valve theory that stressed the importance of the acute anorectal angle. According to this theory, a rise in intra-abdominal pressure caused the upper end of the anal canal to be occluded by anterior rectal mucosa, preventing rectal contents from entering the anal canal. Neuromyopathic faecal incontinence was associated with perineal descent and an obtuse anorectal angle, which rendered the flap-valve-like mechanism ineffective. Further investigations, however, failed to show changes of the anorectal angle, and currently, it is thought that an improvement of muscular contractility is responsible for any improvement in continence [2].

Keywords

Pelvic Floor Anal Canal External Anal Sphincter External Sphincter Endoanal Ultrasound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Parks AG (1975) Anorectal incontinence. P Roy Soc Med 68:681–690Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Athanasiadis S, Sanchez M, Kuprian A (1995) Long-term follow-up of Parks posterior repair. An electromyographic, manometric and radiologic study of 31 patients. Langenbeck Arch Chir 380:22–30Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ (1998) Recent advances in the surgical treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 85:596–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Browning GG, Parks AG (1983) Postanal repair for neuropathic faecal incontinence: correlation of clinical result and anal canal pressures. Br J Surg 70:101–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fielding LP, Goldberg SM (1993) Rob & Smith’s operative surgery. Surgery of the colon, rectum and anus, 5th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Womack NR, Morrison JF, Williams NS (1988) Prospective study of the effects of postanal repair in neurogenic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 75(1):48–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yoshioka K, Keighley MR (1989) Critical assessment of the quality of continence after postanal repair for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 76:1054–1057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engel AF, van Baal SJ, Brummelkamp WH (1994) Late results of postanal repair for idiopathic faecal incontinence. Eur J Surg 160:637–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jameson JS, Speakman CT, Darzi A et al (1994) Audit of postanal repair in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 37:369–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rieger NA, Sarre RG, Saccone GT et al (1997) Postanal repair for faecal incontinence: long-term follow-up. Aust NZ J Surg 67:566–570Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matsuoka H, Mavrantonis C, Wexner SD et al (2000) Postanal repair for fecal incontinence-is it worthwhile? Dis Colon Rectum 43:1561–1567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abbas SM, Bissett IP, Neill ME, Parry BR (2005) Long-term outcome of postanal repair in the treatment of faecal incontinence. ANZ J Surg 75(9):783–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Setti CP, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ (1994) Long-term results of postanal repair for neurogenic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 81:140–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deen KI, Oya M, Ortiz J, Keighley MR (1993) Randomized trial comparing three forms of pelvic floor repair for neuropathic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 80:794–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kamm MA (1998) Fortnightly review: faecal incontinence. BMJ 316:528–532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scott AD, Henry MM, Phillips RK (1990) Clinical assessment and anorectal manometry before postanal repair: failure to predict outcome. Br J Surg 77:628–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S (1995) Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 274:559–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johanson JF, Lafferty J (1996) Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 91:33–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Macmillan AK, Merrie AE, Marshall RJ, Parry BR (2004) The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1341–1349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liavag I, Aanestad O (1985) Fecal incontinence. Diagnosis treatment. Ann Gastroent Hepato 21:247–250Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saleh M. Abbas
  • Ian P. Bissett

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations