Advertisement

Diagnostic Workup in Incontinent Patients: An Integrated Approach

  • Carlo Ratto
  • Angelo Parello
  • Lorenza Donisi
  • Francesco Litta
  • Giovanni B. Doglietto
  • Scott R. Steele
  • Ann C. Lowry
  • Anders F. Mellgren

Abstract

Anal continence is assured by the activity of complex anatomical and physiological structures (anal sphincters, pelvic floor musculature, rectal curvatures, transverse rectal folds, rectal reservoir, rectal sensation). It is dependent also on numerous other factors, such as stool consistency, patient’s mental faculties and mobility, and social convenience. Only if there is an effective, coordinated integration between these elements can defecation proceed normally. On the other hand, fecal incontinence (FI) is the result of disruption of one or several of these different entities: frequently, it can be due to a multifactorial pathogenesis, and in many cases, it is not secondary to sphincter tears. The disruption could lie in alterations intrinsic to the anorectal neuromuscular structures of continence control or be extrinsic to them, involving extrapelvic control mechanisms. The primary aim of an effective therapeutic approach must be the improvement-better, the resolution-of this distressing condition. Different forms of therapy are now available so that physicians must select the best option for each patient.

Keywords

Pelvic Floor Fecal Incontinence Anal Sphincter Rectal Prolapse External Anal Sphincter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bharucha AE, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR et al (2005) Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population based study in women. Gastroenterology 129:42–49Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C (1992) New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 35:482–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (2000) Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:9–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Donovan J, Bosch R, Gotoh M et al (2005) Symptom and quality of life assessment. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein AJ (eds), Incontinence, vol. 1. Health Publications, Plymouth, pp 267–316Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barnett JL, Hasler WL, Camilleri M (1999) American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on anorectal testing techniques. American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology 116:732–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simpson RR, Kennedy ML, Hung Nguyen M et al (2006) Anal manometry: a comparison of techniques. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1033–1038PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bharucha AE (2006) Update of tests of colon and rectal structure and function. J Clin Gastroenterol 40:96–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaur G, Gardiner A, Duthie GS (2006) A new method of assessing anal sphincter integrity using inverted vectormanometry. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1160–1166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    West RL, Felt-Bersma RJ, Hansen BE et al (2005) Volume measurements of the anal sphincter complex in healthy controls and fecal-incontinent patients with a three-dimensional reconstruction of endoanal ultrasonography images. Dis Colon Rectum 48:540–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morren GL, Walter S, Lindehammar H et al (2001) Evaluation of the sacroanal motor pathway by magnetic and electric stimulation in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:167–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jost WH, Schimrigk K (1994) A new method to determine pudendal nerve motor latency and central motor conduction time to the external anal sphincter. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 93:237–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loening-Baucke V, Read NW, Yamada T, Barker AT (1994) Evaluation of the motor and sensory components of the pudendal nerve. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 93:35–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sato T, Konishi F, Minakami H et al (2001) Pelvic floor disturbance after childbirth: vaginal delivery damages the upper levels of sphincter innervation. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1155–1161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lefaucheur JP (2005) Intrarectal ground electrode improves the reliability of motor evoked potentials recorded in the anal sphincter. Muscle Nerve 32:110–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jost WH, Loch EG, Muller-Lobeck H (1998) Electro-physiologic studies of fecal incontinence in the woman. Zentralbl Gynakol 120:153–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Uher EM, Swash M (1998) Sacral reflexes: physiology and clinical application. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1165–1177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lefaucheur JP (2006) Neurophysiological testing in anorectal disorders. Muscle Nerve 33:324–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rao SS, Ozturk R, Stessman M (2004) Investigation of the pathophysiology of fecal seepage. Am J Gastroenterol 99:2204–2209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hussain SM, Stoker J, Lameris JS (1995) Anal sphincter complex: endoanal MR imaging of normal anatomy. Radiology 197:671–677PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Terra MP, Beets-Tan RG, van Der Hulst VP et al (2005) Anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence: endoanal versus external phased-array MR imaging. Radiology 236:886–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williams AB, Malouf AJ, Bartram CI et al (2001) Assessment of external anal sphincter morphology in idiopathic fecal incontinence with endocoil magnetic resonance imaging. Dig Dis Sci 46:1466–1471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Terra MP, Beets-Tan RG, van der Hulst VP et al (2006) MRI in evaluating atrophy of the external anal sphincter in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:991–999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cazemier M, Terra MP, Stoker J et al (2006) Atrophy and defects detection of the external anal sphincter: comparison between three-dimensional anal endosonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 49:20–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Terra MP, Stoker J (2006) The current role of imaging techniques in faecal incontinence. Eur Radiol 16:1727–1736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hetzer FH, Andreisek G, Tsagari C et al (2006) MR defecography in patients with fecal incontinence: imaging findings and their effect on surgical management. Radiology 240:449–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liberman H, Faria J, Ternent CA et al (2001) A prospective evaluation of the value of anorectal physiology in the management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1567–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bharucha AE (2006) Pro: Anorectal testing is useful in fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2679–2681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wald A (2006) Con: Anorectal manometry and imaging are not necessary in patients with fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2681–2683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rao SS (2006) A balancing view: fecal incontinence: test or treat empirically-which strategy is best? Am J Gastroenterol 101:2683–2684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Deutekom M, Terra MP, Dijkgraaf MG et al (2006) Patients’ perception of tests in the assessment of faecal incontinence. Br J Radiol 79:94–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Matzel K, Stadelmaier M, Hohenfellner FP (1995) Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 346:1124–1127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ganio E, Realis Luc A, Ratto C et al (2005) Sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence: functional results and assessment of the quality of life, http://www.colorep.it/Rivista%20CEC/sacral_nerve_modulation_for_feca.htm. Cited 28 Nov 2005
  35. 35.
    Jarrett ME, Varma JS, Duthie GS et al (2004) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in the UK. Br J Surg 91:755–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bernstein AJ, Peters KM (2005) Expanding indications for neuromodulation. Urol Clin North Am 32:59–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jarrett ME, Matzel KE, Christiansen J et al (2005) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in patients with previous partial spinal injury including disc prolapse. Br J Surg 92:734–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kenefick NJ, Vaizey CJ, Nicholls RJ et al (2002) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence due to systemic sclerosis. Gut 51:881–883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Matzel K, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M et al (2001) Chronic sacral spinal nerve Stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term results with foramen and cuff electrodes. Dis Colon Rectum 44:59–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Malouf AJ, Vaizey CJ, Nicholls RJ et al (2000) Permanent sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Ann. Surg 232:143–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Leroi AM, Michot F, Grise P et al (2001) Effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with faecal and urinary incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:779–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jarrett ME, Matzel KE, Stosser M et al (2005) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence following surgery for rectal prolapse repair: a multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1243–1248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Bittorf B et al (2002) Bilateral sacral spinal nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence after low anterior rectum resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 17:430–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ratto C, Grillo E, Parello A et al (2005) Sacral neuromodulation in treatment of fecal incontinence following anterior resection and chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1027–1036PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jarrett ME, Matzel KE, Stosser M et al (2005) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following a rectosigmoid resection for colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:446–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hallan RI, Marzouk DE, Waldron DJ et al (1989) Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 76:973–975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rao SS, Ozturk R, Stessman M (2004) Investigation of the pathophysiology of fecal seepage. Am J Gastroenterol 99:2204–2209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Harper CM et al (2005) Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Gut 54:546–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sun WM, Donnelly TC, Read NW (1992) Utility of a combined test of anorectal manometry, electromyography, and sensation in determining the mechanism of ‘idiopathic’ faecal incontinence. Gut 33:807–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chiarioni G, Bassotti G, Stanganini S et al (2002) Sensory retraining is key to biofeedback therapy for formed stool fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 97:109–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Siproudhis L, El Abkari M, El Alaoui M et al (2005) Low rectal volumes in patients suffering from fecal incontinence: What does it mean? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 22:989–996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Felt-Bersma RJ, van Baren R, Koorevaar M et al (1995) Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:249–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Stoker J, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2001) Pelvic floor imaging. Radiology 218:621–641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Scide B et al (2005) Phenotypic variation in functional disorders of defecation. Gastroenterology 128:1199–1210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF et al (2000) Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 355:260–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ricciardi R, Mellgren AF, Madoff RD et al (2006) The utility of pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies in idiopathic incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 49:852–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    Bannister JJ, Gibbons C, Read NW (1987) Preservation of faecal continence during rises in intra-abdominal pressure: is there a role for the flap-valve? Gut 28:1242–1244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mavrantonis C, Wexner SD (1998) A clinical approach to fecal incontinence. J Clin Gastrol 27(2):108–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dobben AC, Terra MP, Deutekom M et al (2006) Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Woods R, Voyvodic F, Schloithe AC et al (2003) Anal sphincter tears in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 5(6):544–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steele SR, Lee PY, Mullenix PS et al (2006) Is there a role for concomitant pelvic floor repair in patients with sphincter defects in the treatment of fecal incontinence? Int J Colorectal Dis 21:508–514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hetzer FH, Andreisek G, Tsagari C et al (2006) MR defecography in patients with fecal incontinence: imaging findings and their effect on surgical management. Radiology 240(2):449–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conaghan P, Farouk R (2005) Sacral nerve stimulation can be successful in patients with ultrasound evidence of external anal sphincter disruption. Dis Colon Rectum 48(8):1610–1614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rasmussen OO, Buntzen S, Sorensen M et al (2004) Sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 47(7):1158–1161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tjandra JJ, Lim JF, Hiscock R, Rajendra P (2004) Injectable silicone biomaterial for fecal incontinence caused by internal anal sphincter dysfunction is effective. Dis Colon Rectum 47(12):2138–2146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malouf AJ, Vaizey CJ, Norton CS, Kamm MA (2001) Internal anal sphincter augmentation for fecal incontinence using injectable silicone biomaterial. Dis Colon Rectum 44(4):595–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barisic GI, Krivokapic ZV, Markovic VA, Popovic MA (2006) Outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair after 3 months and after a mean of 80 months. Int J Colorectal Dis 21(l):52–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Londono-Schimmer EE, Garcia-Guperly R, Nicholls RJ et al (1994) Overlapping anal sphincter repair for faecal incontinence due to sphincter trauma: five-year follow-up of functional results. Int J Colorectal Dis 9:100–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yoshioka K, Keighley MR (1989) Sphincter repair for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 32:39–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maslekar S, Gardiner AB, Duthie GS (2007) Anterior anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence: Good long-term results are possible. J Am Coll Surg 204(l):40–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bravo Gutierrez A, Madoff RD, Lowry AC Et al (2004) Long-term results of anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 47(5):727–731; discussion 731–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cali RL, Blatchfored GJ, Perry RE et al (1992) Normal variation in anorectal manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 35:1161–1164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Emblem R, Dhaenens G, Stien R et al (1994) The importance of anal endosonography in the evaluation of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 37:42–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hill K, Fanning S, Fennerty MB, Faigel DO (2006) Endoanal ultrasound compared to anorectal manometry for the evaluation of fecal incontinence: a study of the effect these tests have on clinical outcome. Dig Dis Sci 51(2):235–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roig JV, Villoslada C, Lledo S et al (1995) Prevalence of pudendal neuropathy in fecal incontinence. Results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38(9):952–958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen AS, Luchtefeld MA, Senagore AJ et al (1998) Pudendal nerve latency. Does it predict outcome of anal sphincter repair? Dis Colon Rectum 41(8):1005–1009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Osterberg A, Graf W, Edebol Eeg-Olofsson K et al (2000) Results of neurophysiologic evaluation in fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43(9):1256–1261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ricciardi R, Mellgren AF, Madoff RD et al (2006) The utility of pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies in idiopathic incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 49(6) 852–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlo Ratto
  • Angelo Parello
  • Lorenza Donisi
  • Francesco Litta
  • Giovanni B. Doglietto
  • Scott R. Steele
  • Ann C. Lowry
  • Anders F. Mellgren

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations