Advertisement

Imaging of Faecal Incontinence with Endoanal Ultrasound

  • Richelle J. F. Felt-Bersma

Abstract

Endoanal ultrasound (EUS) was introduced 20 years ago by urologists to evaluate the prostate. Later, EUS was extended to other specialists-; first to stage rectal tumors, and next to investigate benign disorders of the anal sphincters and pelvic floor.

Keywords

Faecal Incontinence Anal Sphincter External Anal Sphincter Internal Anal Sphincter Anal Incontinence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Parks AG, Swash M, Urich H (1977) Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut 18:656–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Snooks SJ, Swash M, Setchell M, Henry MM (1984) Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet 2(8402):546–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN et al (1993) Analsphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. New Engl J Med 329:1905–1911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kamm MA (1994) Obstetric damage and faecal incontinence. Lancet 344:730–733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oberwalder M, Connor J, Wexner SD (2003) Metaanalysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br J Surg 90:1333–1337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zetterstrom J, Lopez A, Holmstrom B et al (2003) Obstetric sphincter tears and anal incontinence: an observational follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:921–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abramowitz L, Sobhani I, Ganansia R et al (2000) Are sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? Results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:590–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benifla JL, Abramowitz L, Sobhani I et al (2000) Postpartum sphincter rupture and anal incontinence: prospective study with 259 patients. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 28:15–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Felt-Bersma RJ, Koorevaar M, Strijers RL, Cuesta MA (1995) Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:249–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI (1994) Prospective study of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1031–1033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farouk R, Drew P, Duthie G et al (1996) Disruption of the internal anal sphincter can occur after transanal stapling. Br J Surg 83:1400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Silvis R, van Eekelen JW, Delemarre JB, Gooszen HG (1995) Endosonography of the anal sphincter after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Relation with anal manometry and fecal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 38:383–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI (1997) Primary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive faecal incontinence. Lancet 349:612–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Faltin DL, Boulvain M, Irion O et al (2000) Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears by postpartum endosonography predict fecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 95:643–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Faridi A, Willis S, Schelzig P et al (2002) Anal sphincter injury during vaginal delivery — an argument for cesarean section on request? J Perinat Med 30:379–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eckardt VF, Jung B, Fischer B, Lierse W et al (1994) Anal endosonography in healthy subjects and patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 37:235–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Law PJ, Bartram CI (1989) Anal endosonography. Technique and normal anatomy. Gastrointest Radiol 14:349–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, Hauge C et al (1991) Endosonography of the anal sphincter: Findings in healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:1199–1202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Stolfi VM et al (1992) Endoluminal ultrasound defines anatomy of the anal canal and pelvic floor. Dis Colon Rectum 35:465–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO et al (1992) Anal sphincter size measured by endosonography in healthy volunteers. Effect of age, sex and parity. Acta Radiol 33:453–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Burnett SJ, Bartram CI (1991) Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorect Dis 6:2–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sultan AH, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA et al (1993) Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomy. Br J Surg 80:508–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN et al (1994) Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol 49:368–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Papachrysostomou M, Pye SD, Wild SR, Smith AN (1993) Anal endosonography in asymptomatic subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 28:551–556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gerdes B, Kohler HH, Zielke A et al (1997) The anatomical basis of anal endosonography-a study in postmortem specimens. Surg Endoscopy 11:986–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM (1997) Normal values and reproducibility of anal endosonographic measurements. Eur J Ultrasound 6:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Papachrysostomou M, Pye SD, Wild SR, Smith AN (1994) Significance of the thickness of the anal sphincters with age and its relevance in faecal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol 29:710–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF (1996) Changes in the anal sphincter with age. An endosonographic study. Acta Radiol 37:357–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schafer R, Heyer T, Gantke B et al (1997) Anal endosonography and manometry: comparison in patients with defecation problems. Dis Colon Rectum 40:293–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gantke B, Schafer A, Enck P, Lubke HJ (1993) Sonographic, manometric, and myographic evaluation of the anal sphincters morphology and function. Dis Colon Rectum 36:1037–1041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Emblem R, Dhaenens G, Stien R et al (1994) The importance of anal endosonography in the evaluation of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 37:42–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Klosterhalfen B, Offner F, Topf N et al (1990) Sclerosis of the internal anal sphincter-A process of aging. Dis Colon Rectum 33:606–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM (1999) Anal endosonography in haemorroidal disease: do anatomical changes have clinical implications? Colorectal Dis 1:146–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Loder PB, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ et al (1994) Pathology, pathophysiology and aetiology. Br J Surg 81:946–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lunniss PJ, Phillips R (1992) Anatomy and function of the anal longitudinal muscle. Br J Surg 79:882–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM (1998) Vaginal endosonography of the anal sphincter complex is important in the diagnosis of faecal incontinence and perianal sepsis. Br J Surg 85:359–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gold DM, Bartram CI, Halligan S et al (1999) Three-dimensional endoanal sonography in assessing anal canal injury. Br J Surg 86:365–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    West RL, Felt-Bersma RJ, Hansen BE et al (2005) Volume measurements of the anal sphincter complex in healthy controls and fecal-incontinent patients with a three-dimensional reconstruction of endoanal ultrasonography images. Dis Colon Rectum 48:540–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gregory WT, Boyles SH, Simmons K et al (2006) External anal sphincter volume measurements using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:1243–1248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    West RL, Dwarkasing S, Briel JW et al (2005) Can three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography detect external anal sphincter atrophy? A comparison with endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:328–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cazemier M, Terra MP, Stoker J et al (2006) Atrophy and defects detection of the external anal sphincter: comparison between three-dimensional anal endosonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 49:20–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Christensen AF, Nyhuus B, Nielsen MB, Christensen H (2005) Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improve diagnostic confidence of detecting damage to the anal sphincter complex. Br J Radiol 78:308–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bartram CI (2003) Ultrasound. In: Bartram CI, deLancy JOL (eds) Imaging pelvic floor disorders. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Williams AB, Cheetham MJ, Bartram CI et al (2000) Gender differences in the longitudinal pressure profile of the anal canal related to anatomical structure as demonstrated on three-dimensional anal endosonography. Br J Surg 87:1674–1679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kumar A, Scholefield JH (2000) Endosonography of the anal canal and rectum. World J Surg 24:208–115. ReviewPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rociu E, Stoker J, Zwamborn AW, Lameris JS (1999) Endoanal MR imaging of the anal sphincter in fecal incontinence. Radiographics S171–177Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Meyenberger C, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Buchmann P (1996) Anal sphincter defects in fecal incontinence: correlation between endosonography and surgery. Endoscopy 28:217–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC et al (1994) Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg 81:463–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Romano G, Rotondano G, Esposito P et al (1996) External anal sphincter defects: correlation between pre-operative anal endosonography and intraoperative findings. Br J Radiol 69:6–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Burnett SJ, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Bartram CI (1991) Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mapping. Br J Surg 78:448–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG et al (1993) Anal sphincter defects: Correlation between endoanal ultra-sound and surgery. Ann Surg 218:201–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Schroeder T, Fazio VW (1993) Endoluminal ultrasound is preferable to electromyography in mapping anal sphincteric defects. Dis Colon Rectum 36:689–692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM (1997) Normal values and reproducibility of anal endosonographic measurements. Eur J Ultrasound 6:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Falk PM, Blatchford GJ, Cali RL et al (1994) Transanal ultrasound and manometry in the evaluation of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 37:468–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pinta TM, Kylanpaa ML, Salmi TK et al (2004) Primary sphincter repair: are the results of the operation good enough? Dis Colon Rectum 47:18–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Fritsch H, Brenner E, Lienemann A, Ludwikowski B (2002) Anal sphincter complex: reinterpreted morphology and its clinical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum 45:188–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI (1990) A comparison between electromyography and anal endosonography in mapping external anal sphincter defects. Dis Colon Rectum 33:370–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Enck P, von GHJ, Schafer A et al (1996) Comparison of anal sonography with conventional needle electromyography in the evaluation of anal sphincter defects. Am J Gastroenterol 91:2539–2543PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M (1996) Anal sphincter repair improves anorectal function and endosonographic image. A prospective clinical study. Dis Colon Rectum 39:878–885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Voyvodic F, Rieger NA, Skinner S et al (2003) Endosonographic imaging of anal sphincter injury: does the size of the tear correlate with the degree of dysfunction? Dis Colon Rectum 46:735–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Felt-Bersma RJ (2004) Comment on Voyvodic et al (2003) Endosonographic imaging of anal sphincter injury. Dis Colon Rectum 47(4):546–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Felt-Bersma RJ, van Baren R, Koorevaar M et al (1995) Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:249–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Felt-Bersma RJ, Sloots CE, Poen AC et al (2000) Rectal compliance as a routine measurement: extreme volumes have direct clinical impact and normal volumes exclude rectum as a problem. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1732–1738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Riccard R, Melgren AF, Madoff RD et al (2006) The utility of pudendal nerve terminal latencies in idiopathic incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 49(6):852–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Speakman CT, Burnett SJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI (1991) Sphincter injury after anal dilatation demonstrated by anal endosonography. Br J Surg 78:1429–1430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Khubchandani IT, Reed JF (1989) Sequelae of internal sphincterotomy for chronic fissure in ano. Br J Surg 76:431–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tjandra JJ, Han WR, Ooi BS et al (2001) Faecal incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy is often associated with coexisting occult sphincter defects: a study using endoanal ultrasonography. ANZ J Surg 71:598–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI (1994) Prospective study of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37(10):1031–1033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kennedy HL, Zegarra JP (1990) Fistulotomy without external sphincter division for high anal fistulae. Br J Surg 77:898–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Farouk R, Bartolo DC (1994) The use of endoluminal ultrasound in the assessment of patients with faecal incontinence. J R Coll Surg Edinb 39:312–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Engel AF, Kamm MA, Talbot IC (1994) Progressive systemic sclerosis of the internal anal sphincter leading to passive faecal incontinence. Gut 35:857–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Daniel F, De Parades V, Cellier C (2005) Abnormal appearance of the internal anal sphincter at ultra-sound: a specific feature of progressive systemic sclerosis? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:597–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM (2001) Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol 98:225–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    de Parades V, Etienney I, Thabut D et al (2004) Anal sphincter injury after forceps delivery: myth or reality? A prospective ultrasound study of 93 females. Dis Colon Rectum 47:24–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Lee SJ, Park JW (2000) Follow-up evaluation of the effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1550–1555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Snooks SJ, Swash M, Mathers SE, Henry MM (1990) Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up. Br J Surg 77:1358–1360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Martinez Hernandez Magro P, Villanueva Saenz E, Jaime Zavala M et al (2003) Endoanal sonography in assessment of fecal incontinence following obstetric trauma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:616–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG et al (1993) The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in faecal incontinence: a prospective endosonic study. Gut 34:685–688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Williams AB, Bartram CI, Halligan S et al (2001) Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery using threedimensional endosonography. Obstet Gynecol 97:770–775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D et al (1998) Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol 92:955–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Strijers RL et al (1998) Third-degree obstetric perineal tear: long-term clinical and functional results after primary repair. Br J Surg 85:1433–1438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Eijsbouts QA et al (1998) Hydrogen-peroxide-enhanced transanal ultrasound in the assessment of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1147–1152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Tankova L, Draganov V, Damyanov N (2001) Endosonography for assessment of anorectal changes in patients with fecal incontinence. Eur J Ultrasound 12:221–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Malouf AJ, Williams AB, Halligan S et al (2000) Prospective assessment of accuracy of endoanal MR imaging and endosonography in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:741–745PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Malouf AJ, Halligan S, Williams AB et al (2001) Prospective assessment of interobserver agreement for endoanal MRI in fecal Incontinence. Abdom Imaging 26:76–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Pinta T, Kylanpaa ML, Luukkonen P et al (2004) Anal incontinence: diagnosis by endoanal US or endovaginal MRI. Eur Radiol 14:1472–1477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Williams AB, Bartram CI, Halligan S et al (2002) Endosonographic anatomy of the normal anal canal compared with endocoil magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 45:176–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ, Lameris JS (2000) Normal anal sphincter anatomy and age-and sex-related variations at high-spatial-resolution endoanal MR imaging. Radiology 217:395–401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Beets-Tan RG, Morren GL, Beets GL et al (2001) Measurement of anal sphincter muscles: endoanal US, endoanal MR imaging, or phased-array MR imaging? A study with healthy volunteers. Radiology 220:81–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Jones NM, Humphreys MS, Goodman TR et al (2003) The value of anal endosonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging following the repair of anorectal malformations. Pediatr Radiol 33:183–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Briel JW, Zimmerman DD, Stoker J et al (2000) Relationship between sphincter morphology on endoanal MRI and histopathological aspects of the external anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 15:87–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Terra MP, Deutekom M, Beets-Tan RG et al (2006) Relationship between external anal sphincter atrophy at endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical, functional, and anatomic characteristics in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 49:668–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Felt-Bersma R, Gort G, Meuwissen S (1991) Normal values in anal manometry and rectal sensation: A problem of range. Hepato Gastroenterol 38:444–449Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Burnett SJ, Spence Jones C, Speakman CT et al (1991) Unsuspected sphincter damage following childbirth revealed by anal endosonography. Br J Radiol 64: 225–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M et al (1992) Anal endosonography: Relationship with anal manometry and neurophysiologic tests. Dis Colon Rectum 35:944–949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC et al (1994) Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg 81:463–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J (1993) Endosonographic evaluation of patients with anal incontinence: Findings and influence on surgical management. AJR Am J Roentgen ol 160:771–775Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Rieger NA, Sweeney JL, Hoffmann DC et al (1996) Investigation of fecal incontinence with endoanal ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 39:860–864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Hill K, Fanning S, Fennerty MB, Faigel DO (2006) Endoanal ultrasound compared to anorectal manometry for the evaluation of fecal incontinence: a study of the effect these tests have on clinical outcome. Dig Dis Sci 51:235–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Barthet M, Bellon P, Abou E et al (2002) Anal endosonography for assessment of anal incontinence with a linear probe: relationships with clinical and manometric features. Int J Colorectal Dis 17:123–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M (1996) Anal sphincter repair improves anorectal function and endosonographic image. A prospective clinical study. Dis Colon Rectum 39:878–885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Nielsen MB, Dammegaard L, Pedersen JF (1994) Endosonographic assessment of the anal sphincter after surgical reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 37:434–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM (1998) Third degree perineal rupture: long term clinical and functional results after primary repair. Br J Surg 85:1433–1438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Sitzler PJ, Thomson JP (1996) Overlap repair of damaged anal sphincter. A single surgeon’s series. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1356–1360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Engel AF, Kamm MA, Sultan AHet al (1994) Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma. BrJ Surg 81:1231–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Ternent CA, Shashidharan M, Blatchford GJ et al (1997) Transanal ultrasound and anorectal physiology findings affecting continence after sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 40:462–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Starck M, Bohe M, Valentin L (2006) The extent of endosonographic anal sphincter defects after primary repair of obstetric sphincter tears increases over time and is related to anal incontinence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:188–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Allgayer H, Dietrich CF, Rohde W et al (2005) Prospective comparison of short-and long-term effects of pelvic floor exercise/biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence after surgery plus irradiation versus surgery alone for colorectal cancer: clinical, functional and endoscopic/endosonographic findings. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:1168–1175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Norderval S, Oian P, Revhaug A, Vonen B (2005) Anal incontinence after obstetric sphincter tears: outcome of anatomic primary repairs. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1055–1061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Giordano P, Renzi A, Efron J et al (2002) Previous sphincter repair does not affect the outcome of repeat repair. Dis Colon Rectum 45:635–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Savoye-Collet C, Savoye G, Koning E et al (1999) Anal endosonography after sphincter repair: specific patterns related to clinical outcome. Abdom Imaging 24:569–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richelle J. F. Felt-Bersma

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations