Advertisement

International Guidelines on Acute Coronary Syndrome: Practical Application and Current News in Cardiology

  • Giacomo Chiarandà
  • Giuseppa Strano
  • Angela Lazzaro
  • Marta Chiarandà

Abstract

For the last few years, the main scientific international societies have enacted guidelines regarding the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with the aim of promoting the best diagnostic and therapeutic methods in cardiology. These guidelines have been frequently revised according to scientific evidence of randomized clinical studies [1, 2]. Among other issues, they have addressed the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, low-molecular-weight heparin, the prescription of clopidogrel, and criteria for the selection of patients for very aggressive or less aggressive early treatment.

Keywords

Acute Coronary Syndrome Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Acute Coronary Syndrome NSTE Myocardial Infarction Registry Current News 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Van de Werf D, Ardissimo D, Betriu A et al (2003) Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 24:28–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertrand ME, Simoons MI, Fox KA et al, on behalf of the Task Force on the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (2002) Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent — ST segment elevation. Eur Heart J 223:1809–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ et al (2000) The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 284:835–842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oltrona L, Ottani F, Galvani M, on behalf of the Working Group on Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology and Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri (ANMCO) (2004) Clinical significance of a single measurement of troponin-I and C-reactive protein at admission in 1,773 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 148:405–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA et al, for the TACTICS Investigators (2001) Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med 344:1879–1887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kent DM, Schimd CH, Lau J et al (2002) Is primary angioplasty for some as good as primary angioplasty for all? J Gen Intern Med 17:887–894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bassand JP (2000) Improving the quality and dissemination of guidelines: the quest for the Holy Grail. Eur Heart J 21:1289–1290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW et al (2002) ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction — 2002: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the management of patients with unstable angina). Circulation 106:1893–1900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peterson ED (2005) Management of patients with NSTE ACS: latest insights from CRUSADE, a National Quality Improvement Initiative. American College of Cardiology, Scientific SessionsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alexander HP, Roe MP, Chen AY et al (2005) Evolution in cardiovascular care for elderly patients with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary sondromes: results fron the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:14479–14487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blomkalns AL, Chen AY, Hochman JS et al () Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treratment of non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: largescale observations fron the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 45:832–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tricoci P, Peterson EP, Mulgund J et al () Temporal trends in the use of early cardiac catheterization in patients with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (results from CRUSADE). Am J Cardiol 2006 98:1172–1176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bhatt DL, Roe MT, Peterson ED et al, for the CRUSADE Investigators (2004) Utilization of early invasive management strategies for high-risk patients with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative. JAMA 292:2096–2104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Di Chiara A, Fresco C, Savonitto S et al (2006) Epidemiology of non ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in the italian cardiology network: the BLITZ-2 study. Eur Heart J 27:393–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    The Registro Osservazionale Angina Instabile (ROSAI-2) Investigators (2003) Treatment modalities of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in the real world. Results of the prospective ROSAI-2 registry. Ital Heart J 4:782–790Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ohman EM, Roe MT, Smith SC et al, for the CRUSADE Investigators (2004) Care of non ST-segment elevation patients: insights fron the CRUSADE national quality improvement initiative. Am Heart J 148(Suppl):S34–S39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peterson E, Parsons L, Pollack C et al (2002) Variation of AMI care quality across 1,085 US hospital and its association with hospital mortality rates. Circulation 106:II722 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Danchin N, Grenier O, Ferrieres J et al (2002) Use of secondary preventive drugs in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated medically or with coronary angioplasty: results from the nationwide French PREVENIR survey. Heart 88:20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eagle KA, Goodman SG, Avezum A et al (2002) Practice variations and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Lancet 359:373–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roe MT, Parson LS, Pollack CV et al, for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Investigators (2005) Quality of care by classification of myocardial infarction. Treatment patterns for ST-segment elevation vs non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 165:1630–1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mehta RH, Montoye CK, Gallogly M et al, for the GAP Steering Committee of the American College of Cardiology (2002) Improving quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: the Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) initiative. JAMA 287:1269–1276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gottwik M, Zahn R, Schiele R et al, for the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) Study Group (2001) Differences in the treatment and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with compared to without departments of cardiology: results from the pooled data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA 1-2) Registres and Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR). Eur Heart J 22:1794–1801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Topol EJ, Kereiakes DJ (2003) Regionalization of care for acute ischemic heart disease: a call for specialized centers. Circulation 107:1463–1466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giacomo Chiarandà
    • 1
  • Giuseppa Strano
    • 1
  • Angela Lazzaro
    • 1
  • Marta Chiarandà
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiology Operative Unit, Muscatello HospitalAUSL 8 SyracuseAugusta (SR)Italy

Personalised recommendations