Applications of TVI Sensing in Cardiac Stimulation

  • Eraldo Occhetta
  • Miriam Bortnik
  • Franco Di Gregorio
  • Alberto Barbetta
  • Paolo Marino
Conference paper


Permanent cardiac stimulation has become increasingly complex, and modern pacing devices are now equipped with a wide set of functions aimed at reproducing as closely as possible the physiological control of cardiac rhythm, including dual-chamber and three-chamber architecture, sensordriven rate-response, careful management, and rate-adaptation of the atrioventricular delay. Special algorithms have been developed to allow pacing and sensing autoregulation, self-limitation of unnecessary ventricular stimulation, pacing-mode switch in the event of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, overdrive pacing aimed at preventing atrial fibrillation, etc. However, in spite of the improved effectiveness in sensing and processing cardiac electric signals, standard pacemakers do not take into account the associated mechanical activity, which is the final expression of ventricular function. So far, a few special models have been equipped with hemodynamic sensors, which are used to assess changes in myocardial contractility and accordingly regulate rate-responsive pacing [1]–[4]. However, no attempt has been made to acquire information on the heart’s hemodynamic activity on a beat-by-beat basis.


Ventricular Pace Systolic Ejection Cardiac Stimulation Overdrive Pace Threshold Tracking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bennett T, Sharma A, Sutton R et al (1992) Development of a rate adaptive pacemaker based on the maximum rate-of-rise of right ventricular pressure (RV dP/dtmax). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 15: 219–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rickards AF, Bombardini T, Plicchi G et al (1996) An implantable intracardiac accelerometer for monitoring myocardial contractility. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:2066–2071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Osswald S, Cron T, Gradel C et al (2000) Closed-loop stimulation using intracardiac impedance as a sensor principle: correlation of right ventricular dP/dt max and intracardiac impedance during dobutamine stress test. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:1502–1508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Occhetta E, Magnani A, Bortnik M et al (2003) Hemodynamic sensors: their impact in clinical practice. In: Raviele A (ed) Cardiac Arrhythmias 2003. Springer, Milan, pp 713–718Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Gregorio F, Morra A, Finesso M, Bongiorni MG (1996) Transvalvular impedance (TVI) recording under electrical and pharmacological cardiac stimulation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1689–1693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gasparini M, Curnis A, Mantica M et al (2001) Hemodynamic sensors: what clinical value do they have in heart failure? In: Raviele A (ed) Cardiac Arrhythmias 2001. Springer, Milan, pp 576–585Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chirife R, Ortega DF, Salazar A (1993) Feasibility of measuring relative right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with implantable rhythm control devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 16:1673–1683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chirife R, Tentori MC, Mazzetti H, Dasso D (2001) Hemodynamic sensors: are they all the same? In: Raviele A (ed) Cardiac Arrhythmias 2001. Springer, Milan, pp 566–575Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Gregorio F, Curnis A, Pettini A et al (2002) Trans-valvular impedance (TVI) in the hemodynamic regulation of cardiac pacing. In: Mitro P, Pella D, Rybár R, Valočvik G (eds) Cardiovascular Diseases 2002. Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, pp 53–57Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bongiorni MG, Soldati E, Arena G et al (2005) Haemodynamic assessment by transvalvular impedance recording. In: Gulizia MM (ed) Emerging pathologies in cardiology. Springer, Milan, pp 323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gasparini G, Curnis A, Gulizia M et al (2005) Rate-responsive pacing regulated by cardiac haemodynamics. Europace 7:234–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bongiorni MG, Soldati E, Arena G et al (2003) Transvalvular impedance: does it allow automatic capture detection? In: Raviele A (ed) Cardiac Arrhythmias 2003. Springer, Milan, pp 733–739Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duru F, Bauersfeld U, Schüller H et al (2000) Threshold tracking pacing based on beat by beat evoked response detection: clinical benefits and potential problems. J Intervent Cardiol Electrophysiol 4:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Candinas R, Liu B, Leal J et al (2002) Impact of fusion avoidance on performance of the automatic threshold tracking feature in dual chamber pacemakers: a multicenter prospective randomized study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25:1540–1545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eraldo Occhetta
    • 1
  • Miriam Bortnik
    • 1
  • Franco Di Gregorio
    • 2
  • Alberto Barbetta
    • 2
  • Paolo Marino
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, School of MedicineUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte OrientaleNovara
  2. 2.Clinical Research UnitMedico SpaRubano (PD)Italy

Personalised recommendations