Advertisement

Focus on Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Techniques

  • Maurizio Lunati
  • Yann Poezevara
  • Andrea Boncompagni
Conference paper

Abstract

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is now a first-line therapy in moderate to severe congestive heart failure patients with broad QRS, a number of treatment modalities remain open issues. Patient selection criteria need to be further specified, as a broader population can probably benefit from CRT. For instance, several clinical trials are currently addressing the role of CRT in patients with narrow QRS, with mild heart failure (HF) symptoms, or with complete AV block to prevent HF development. But even in those patients who meet current selection criteria, we need to further understand some aspects of the treatment modalities to offer maximum benefit from the therapy: Which location for the right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) pacing leads offers the best resynchronization? How should CRT parameters (AV and VV delays) be programmed to provide maximum hemodynamic benefit? Answers to these questions are crucial to reduce the number of non-responders to CRT, and to maximize the response to CRT by the majority of patients. In this review we will focus on techniques to optimize CRT programming.

Keywords

Right Ventricular Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Mild Heart Failure Right Ventricular Lead Interventricular Delay 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Block M et al (1999) Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 9:2993–3001Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perego G, Chianca R, Facchini M et al (2003) Simultaneous vs sequential biventricular pacing in dilated cardiomyopathy: an acute hemodynamic study. Eur J Heart Fail 5:305–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Gelder B, Bracke FA, Meijer A et al (2004) Effect of optimizing the VV interval on left ventricular contractility in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 93:1500–1503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riedlbauchova L, Kautzner J, Fridl P (2005) Influence of different atrioventricular and interventricular delays on cardiac output during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28(Suppl 1):S19–S23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Auricchio A, Fantoni C, Regoli F et al (2004) Characterization of left ventricular activation in patients with heart failure and left bundle-branch block. Circulation 109:1133–1139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sogaard P, Egeblad H, Pedersen AK et al (2002) Sequential versus simultaneous biventricular resynchronization for severe heart failure. Circulation 106:2078–2084PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Porciani MC, Dondina C, Macioce R et al (2006) Temporal variation in optimal atrioventricular and interventricular delay during cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Card Fai 12:715–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Donnel D, Nadurata V, Hamer A et al (2005) Long-term variation of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28(Suppl 1):S24–S26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bleeker GB, Schalij MJ, Molhoek SG et al (2004) Relationship between QRS duration and left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with end-stage heart failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 15:544–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burri H, Sunthorn H, Shah D, Lerch R (2006) Optimization of device programming for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 29:1416–1425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scharf C, Li P, Muntwyler J et al (2005) Rate-dependent AV delay optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28:279–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Verbeek XA, Vernooy K, Peschar M et al (2003) Intra-ventricular resynchronization for optimal left ventricular function during pacing in experimental left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:558–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Porciani MC, Dondina C, Macioce R et al (2005) Echocardiographic examination of atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Car diol 95:1108–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Plicchi G, Marcelli E, Parlapiano M, Bombardini T (2002) PEA I and PEA II based implantable haemodynamic monitor: pre clinical studies in sheep. Europace 4:49–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plicchi G, Marcelli E, Bombardini T, Gaggini G (2002) PEA I and PEA II based implantable system for monitoring acute ventricular failure. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28(4 Part II):691Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bombardini T, Gaggini G, Marcelli E et al (2000) Peak endocardial acceleration reflects heart contractility also in atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:1381–1385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rickards AF, Bombardini T, Corbucci G, Plicchi G (1996) An implantable intracardiac accelerometer for monitoring myocardial contractility. The Multicenter PEA Study Group. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19(12 Pt 1):2066–2071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ritter P, Padeletti L, Gillio-Meina L, Gaggini G (1999) Determination of the optimal atrioventricular delay in DDD pacing. Comparison between echo and peak endocardial acceleration measurements. Europace 1:126–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Min X, Meine M, Baker JH 2nd et al (2007) Estimation of the optimal VV delay by an IEGM-based method in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 301(Suppl 1): S19–S22Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gold MR, Niazi I, Giudici M et al (2007) A prospective comparison of AV delay programming methods for hemodynamic optimization during cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 18:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Braunschweig F, Kjellstrom B, Gadler F, Linde C (2004) Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy by continuous hemodynamic monitoring. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 15:94–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurizio Lunati
    • 1
  • Yann Poezevara
    • 2
  • Andrea Boncompagni
    • 3
  1. 1.Cardiology Department, Electrophysiology UnitNiguarda Ca’ Granda HospitalMilanItaly
  2. 2.SORIN GroupLes Plessis Robinson CedexFrance
  3. 3.SORIN GroupMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations