Advertisement

The Utility of Continuous Axial Brachial Plexus Catheters after Surgery

  • Fabio Gazzotti
  • Lucio V. Indrizzi
  • Giuseppe Magni
  • Elisabetta Bertellini
  • Alberto Tassi

Abstract

Surgery of elbow lesions is a challenging and demanding procedure. In recent years, an aggressive approach to the treatment of even chronic lesions around the elbow joint in combination with more specific surgical techniques and advanced postoperative rehabilitation have increased the indications for surgical intervention and improved the final outcome [1, 2, 3].

Keywords

Brachial Plexus Coracoid Process Continuous Passive Motion Brachial Plexus Block Monitor Anesthesia Care 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Morrey BF (2005) The post-traumatic stiff elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res 431:26–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jupiter JB, O’Driscoll SW, Cohen MS (2003) The assessment and management of the stiff elbow. Instr Course Lect 52:93–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sojbjerg JO (1996) The stiff elbow. Acta Orthop Scand 67:626–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Driscoll SW, Giori NJ (2000) Continuous passive motion (CPM): theory and principles of clinical application. J Rehabil Res Dev 37:179–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chinchalkar SJ, Szekeres M (2004) Rehabilitation of elbow trauma. Hand Clin 20:363–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Rotboll Nielsen P, Risby Mortensen C (2000) A comparison of coracoid and axillary approaches to the brachial plexus. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 44:274–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parikh RK, Rymaszewski LR, Scott NB (1995) Prolonged postoperative analgesia for arthrolysis of the elbow joint. Br J Anaesth 74:469–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schroeder LE, Horlocker TT, Schroeder DR (1996) The efficacy of axillary block for surgical procedures about the elbow. Anesth Analg 83:747–751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown AR (2002) Anaesthesia for procedures of the hand and elbow. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 16:227–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hadzic A, Arliss J, Kerimoglu B et al (2004) A comparison of infraclavicular nerve block versus general anesthesia for hand and wrist day-case surgeries. Anesthesiology 101:127–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    White PF (1995) Management of postoperative pain and emesis. Can J Anaesth 42:1053–1055PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kang SB, Rumball KM, Ettinger RS (2003) Continuous axillary brachial plexus analgesia in a patient with severe hemophilia. J Clin Anesth 15:38–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mezzatesta JP, Scott DA, Schweitzer SA et al (1997) Continuous axillary brachial plexus block for postoperative pain relief. Intermittent bolus versus continuous infusion. Reg Anesth 22:357–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bergman BD, Hebl JR, Kent J, Horlocker TT (2003) Neurologic complications of 405 consecutive continuous axillary catheters. Anesth Analg 96:247–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schreiber T, Ullrich K, Paplow B et al (2002) The use of the infraclavicular plexus catheter for the treatment of postoperative and chronic pain. Anaesthesist 51:16–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK (2003) Continuous infraclavicular perineural infusion with clonidine plus ropivacaine compared with ropivacaine alone: a randomized double-blinded, controlled study. Anesth Analg 97:706–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK (2004) Infraclavicular perineural local anesthetic infusion: a comparison of three dosing regimens for postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology 100:395–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Desroches J (2003) The infraclavicular brachial plexus block by the coracoid approach is clinically effective: an observational study of 150 patients. Can J Anaesth 50:253–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Oven H, Agnoletti V, Borghi B et al (2001) [Patient controlled regional analgesia (PCRA) in surgery of stiff elbow: elastomeric vs. electronic pump]. Minerva Anestesiol 67:117–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK (2002) Continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized double-blinded, placebocontrolled study. Anesthesiology 96:1297–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dadure C, Raux O, Capdevila X et al (2003) Continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block for acute pain management in children. Anesth Analg 97:691–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Porter JM, McCartney CJ, Chan VW (2005) Needle placement and injection posterior to the axillary artery may predict successful infraclavicular brachial plexus block: report of three cases. Can J Anaesth 52:69–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wilson JL, Brown DL, Wong GY et al (1998) Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: parasagittal anatomy important to the coracoid technique. Anesth Analg 87:870–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grossi P, Coluccia R, Tassi A, Indrizzi VL, Gazzotti F (1999) The infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Techniques in regional anesthesia and pain management. 3:217–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Borene SC, Edwards JN, Boezaart AP (2004) At the cords, the pinkie towards: Interpreting infraclavicular motor responses to neurostimulation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 29:125–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rodriguez J, Taboada-Muniz M, Barcena M et al (2004) Median versus musculocutaneous nerve response with single injection infraclavicular coracoid block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 29:534–538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wehling MJ, Koorn R, Leddell C et al (2004) Electrical nerve stimulation using a stimulating catheter: what is the lower limit? Reg Anesth Pain Med 29:230–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boezaart AP, De Beer JF, Nell ML (2003) Early experience with continuous cervical paravertebral block using a stimulating catheter. Reg Anesth Pain Med 28:406–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio Gazzotti
    • 1
  • Lucio V. Indrizzi
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Magni
    • 1
  • Elisabetta Bertellini
    • 2
  • Alberto Tassi
    • 3
  1. 1.Anesthesia Unit Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital Policlinico di ModenaModenaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Critical CareAUSL Modena Carpi HospitalCarpi (MO)Italy
  3. 3.Anesthesia Unit Chief Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital Policlinico di ModenaModenaItaly

Personalised recommendations