Skip to main content

The Role of the Pathologist in the Diagnosis of Fetal Heart Disease

  • Chapter
Echocardiographic Anatomy in the Fetus
  • 1827 Accesses

Abstract

The importance of autopsy in the event of fetal or neonatal death is widely demonstrated in several studies [13]. Thanks to the diagnostic power now provided by cross-sectional echocardiography, most structural and functional congenital heart diseases can be identified during fetal life. However, it is unreasonable to expect 100% sensitivity in all cases. In fact, many drawbacks can limit the ultrasonic examination, such as gestational age at the time of scan, fetal position, ultrasonic impedance of the maternal abdomen, examiner experience, and types of equipment used. In case of termination or spontaneous intrauterine death autopsy is still a valuable tool that provides clinicopathological correlation for clinicians and gives information to families regarding the risk of recurrence of specific diseases in future pregnancies. In the latter instance, evaluations can be made earlier in gestation, allowing informed decisions that will be in the best interest of the mother and fetus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bove KE (1997) Practice guidelines for autopsy pathology: the perinatal and pediatric autopsy. Autopsy Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 121:368–376

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gordijn SJ, Erwich JJHM, Khong TY (2002) Value of perinatal autopsy: critique. Pediatr Devel Pathol 5:480–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Siebert JR, Kapur RP (2000) Congenital anomalies in the fetus: approaches to examination and diagnosis. Path Case Rev 5:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Redfern M, Keeling JW, Powell E (2001) The Royal Liverpool Children’s Inquiry Report. The Stationary Office, Norwich, UK

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy L (2001) The report of the public inquiry into children’s heart surgery at The Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995. Learning from Bristol. The Stationary Office, Norwich, UK

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cook CA, Yates RW, Anderson RH (2004) Normal and abnormal fetal cardiac anatomy. Prenat Diagn 24:1032–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sheaff MT, Hopster DJ (2005) Post mortem technique handbook. Springer, London, pp 119–140

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilbert-Barness E, Debich-Spicer DE (2005) Handbook of pediatric autopsy pathology, Humana Press, Totowa, pp 191–250

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gilbert-Barness E (2007) Potter’s pathology of the fetus, infant and child, 2nd edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 969–1071

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brodlie M, Laing IA, Keeling JW, et al (2002) Ten years of neonatal autopsies in a tertiary referral centre: retrospective study. BMJ 324:761–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Okah FA (2002). The autopsy: experience of a regional neonatal intensive care unit. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 16:350–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ros PR, Li KC, Vo P et al (1990) Preautopsy magnetic resonance imaging: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging 8:303–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brookes JS, Hagmann C (2006) MRI in fetal necroscopy. J Magn Reson Imag 24:1221–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jackowski C, Schweitzer W, Thali M et al (2005) Virtopsy; postmortem imaging of the human heart in situ using MSCT and MRI. Forensic Sci Int 149:11–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Harris DP et al (1997) Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:41–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alderliesten ME, Peringa J, van der Hulst VP et al (2003) Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice. BJOG 110:378–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huisman TA, Wisser J, Stallmach T et al (2002) MR autopsy in fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 17:58–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sebire NJ (2006) Towards the minimally invasive autopsy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:865–867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aiello VD, Debich-Spicer D, Anderson RH (2007) Is there still a role for cardiac autopsy in 2007? Cardiol Young 17:97–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bussolati G, Marchiò C, Volante M (2005) Tissue arrays as fiducial markers for section alignment in 3-D reconstruction technology. J Cell Mol Med 9:438–445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fredouille C, Morice JE, Delbecque K et al (2006) New fetopathological section of the heart. Correlated to the ultrasonographic 4-chamber view in fetuses. Ann Pathol 26(1):60–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Praagh R (1972) The segmental approach to diagnosis in congenital heart disease. In: Bergsma D (ed) Birth defects original article series, vol VIII, no. 5, The National Foundation — March of Dimes. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 4–23

    Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson RH, Ho SY (1977) Continuing medical education, Sequential segmental analysis-description and categorization for the Millenia. Cardiol Young 7:98–116

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anderson RH (2000) Nomenclature and classification; sequential segmental analysis. In: Moller JH, Hoffman JIE (eds) Pediatric cardiovascular medicine. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 263–274

    Google Scholar 

  25. Varetto L, Gargallo C, Botta G et al (2008) Photographic documentation of autopsies. Minerva Medicoleg 128:1–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). The Role of the Pathologist in the Diagnosis of Fetal Heart Disease. In: Echocardiographic Anatomy in the Fetus. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0573-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0573-0_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0572-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0573-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics